A transgender man has given birth to a baby after being impregnated by a transgender doctor using the sperm of a transgender woman.
As we might actually put this more simply. A woman – possessor of ovaries, womb etc – has been impregnated by a man – possessor of testes and thus producing sperm.
How the various people involved dress, shave or regard themselves doesn’t really change that biological base set of facts there, does it?
Or put it even more simply. Nutters. Ignore & avoid..
That poor child.
Facts are an invention of the right to confuse people.
If you want trans recognition in Germany you have to be irreversibly sterile (among other requirements).
Not sure if that is a good thing or a bit too old fashioned German.
Rowdy says what needs to be said. What society would allow two such evidently deranged and damaged people to raise a child?
Not one destined to survive. That’s what sort of society.
But then no societies survive, Julia. They are all doomed – it’s human nature.
How the various people involved dress, shave or regard themselves doesn’t really change that biological base set of facts there, does it?
Has it not been recently legally established in the UK that the self-regard does predominate? And that your statement would render you liable to dismissal from employment and other arenas?
“Communist propaganda writ small,” as Dalrymple describes.
http://libertytree.ca/quotes/Theodore.Dalrymple.Quote.B722
Don’t tolerate it. Tell the Mail they are evil.
Will the baby be born a neuter until old enough to decide whether it wants to be male or female or perhaps some other gender it apparently can invent for itself?
John B.
Baby? Wash your mouth out. What if it identifies as a squirrel?
Goddamn clown world
Another headline I read on this said “female sperm”.
Loonies.
In these confused moments I just curl up and listen to
https://youtu.be/ZJOxkuVovPY
Failing that, there is always The Edward Woodward Album (1972).
Titania McGrath’s excellent response to that headline:
Why does the trans status of the Doctor matter?
@Gamecock December 29, 2019 at 12:04 pm
University Bans Facts – insanity reaches ever higher
University bans factual science; science must exclude any scientific facts that may cause offense to a faux indigenous minority.
Why? Because they believe in their dreams they are indigenous
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tRsWNxsuHi4
So, a girly who thinks she’s a boy has gotten herself up the duff (with the apparent assistance of some sort of nutter who doesn’t know what it is) by a boy who thinks he’s a girly. Result being a sprog who is in for a world of hurt and will with any luck grow up to murder his parents with an axe.
We have reached peak faggotry, all mockery is now superfluous.
Jussi–The weirdest thing about that link is the drawn record cover.
The woman is recognisable as Sophia Loren.
Who the Hell is the bloke supposed to be? Mario Masterantonononio? Louis Jordan? Michael Aspel?
“We have reached peak faggotry, all mockery is now superfluous.”
We are approaching peak stupid, too:
‘Blind Marching Band from Ohio to Lead New Year’s Eve Parade’