Ritchie’s peer reviewed paper

Not very well reviewed then:

George S Gordon says:
March 9 2020 at 2:16 pm
Still working my way through the paper but I note that, unless I’m missing an explanation in the text, Table 2 appears to contain an error.

The 3 totals make sense, but only if NI contributions in the first column are £221bn.
I spotted this by observing that the row for NI did not add up.

Apologies (obviously), if I’ve missed something.

Reply
Richard Murphy says:
March 9 2020 at 2:25 pm
Damn….

Richard Murphy says:
March 9 2020 at 5:30 pm
It is in the press…too late for corrections….

3 thoughts on “Ritchie’s peer reviewed paper”

  1. But surely he’s peerless, he has no peers, no one to stand at the lonely intellectual peak he has reached

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *