I do not vouch for the veracity hereJune 7, 2020June 7, 2020 Tim WorstallUncategorized5 CommentsGiven the existence of Photoshop. But would be lovely to think that it was real: previousNo, really, this is supernextInteresting but wrong 5 thoughts on “I do not vouch for the veracity here” Grikath June 7, 2020 at 7:11 pm Maybe because it is a Photoshop… Pretty well done, but you can spot the things that were forgotten… That said… Wouldn’t be the first time this sort of thing has actually happened… So it is most definitely in the realm where suspension of disbelief is not needed.. so 9/10 … 😉 John June 7, 2020 at 7:29 pm It recommends the use of hand gel in these pubic spaces. Just imagine if a US President had suggested something similar. Ele Ludemann June 7, 2020 at 10:43 pm In my first job as a reporter I interviewed an elderly woman who had been playing the organ at the Catholic Basilica for decades. In those days reporters typed on Imperial typewriters on paper, the story was subbed then sent to the printers who typed it on computers for printing. (A union agreement wouldn’t allow reporters to type the stories straight onto the computer). Somewhere between the sub and the publishing of that day’s newspaper the L was missed out in the sentence talking about the organist’s first public performance. Southerner June 9, 2020 at 11:02 am Already around 1970 I think, Playboy asked readers to stop submitting public/pubic stories and pix, due to the overwhelming volume. So Much For Subtlety June 9, 2020 at 11:13 am Southerner June 9, 2020 at 11:02 am – “Already around 1970 I think, Playboy asked readers to stop submitting public/pubic stories and pix, due to the overwhelming volume.” So not enough people were buying Playboy just for the public pubic stories? Leave a Reply Cancel replyYour email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *Comment Name * Email * Website Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.