Citizens, chosen at random (like a jury) informed by experts, and deliberating together, should be empowered to come up with a plan for the path forward, post-corona.
Or, perhaps, whose experts?
For example, can anyone imagine a certain Tim Worstall being asked to be one of the experts advising such citizens? On, say, mineral reserves and resources, a subject upon which he actually is expert?
No? Then it’s possibly going to be subject to a certain amount of bias, isn’t it?