This is a spectacular level of self-abasement

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex’s new strategist has claimed all white people are “rife with internalised racism and unconscious bias.”

Genevieve Roth said she realised she was “racist” after marrying her black husband.

“Race is an issue in our marriage because as a white woman of privilege, I have racist tendencies written in at a cellular level,” she said.

It also rather doesn’t work. If the racism is written in at the cellular level then it’s as with sexual attraction, innate. So, just as the gays were – righteously – told to get on with it without societal limitation or even disapproval then so must racists.

It’s only if the racism – as with the gay bit – is a choice that behaviour should righteously be moderated, no?

36 thoughts on “This is a spectacular level of self-abasement”

  1. Or the other, final, solution: all white people of privilege get rounded up and sent to the gas chambers if they can’t be reeducated.

  2. Will you please shut the fuck up about your fucking skin colour, I don’t give a shit.

    So fuck off.

  3. Bloke in North Dorset

    It doesn’t include the bit where, having realised she was a racist, she walked out on her husband and went off to join the BNP or some other group.

    Some racist.

  4. A couple of thoughts…

    The reason she thinks everybody else needs to be prodded about their unconscious bias is because of her own conscious bias. Actually, what needs to happen is for her to stop presuming that everybody else thinks the same way as her. We don’t.

    People are, quite a lot of the time, cnuts to other people. While they’re capable of acts of kindness, they’re also capable of acts of extreme canutery. What these racism and gay – and all the rest – campaigners do is collect lists of all those acts of extreme canutery and attribute every single one to racism or homophobia or whatever. But we don’t need an ism to explain them. The fact that so many of these campaigners are totally objectionable invites sharp, withering responses, which are themselves used as further evidence. And so on.

  5. Yeah as I said to my strategist only the other day…….. What in the name of God is a fucking strategist? And why would we even care? Truly these people are insane.

  6. “Race is an issue in our marriage because as a white woman of privilege, I have racist itendencies written in at a cellular level,”

    This falls apart in so many ways. And the more you think about it, the even more ways it just doesn’t make any sense.

    What is it about being a white woman of privilege that makes you racist?
    Are white people inherently racist?
    Are women inherently racist?
    Are privileged people inherently racist?

    Is it just this combination of white, privileged and women? Or is it any combination of the three attributes, from 1 to 3?

    If it’s written in at the cellular level…
    Aren’t we always being told that blacks/whites/Asians/whatevers are all the same at the cellular level? So doesn’t that mean that every race is racist? Or is it only one/a few races have the “racist” characteristics? Cos if that’s true that sounds like some cell types might be preferable to others, which implies a superiority – oh dear, that sounds a bit racist…

    On another thing about this. She says race is an issue in her marriage. To a black man.
    What?
    Why would you marry someone from a different ethnicity/nationality if it is an issue for either of you?
    Jeez, their marriage sounds like a barrel of laughs…

    My head hurts just from thinking about it.

  7. ‘Or the other, final, solution: all white people of privilege get rounded up and sent to the gas chambers if they can’t be reeducated.’

    Actually I think they’d rather just round up all white people and gas the lot.

  8. harry, you can stay at my place mate, but for gawd sake, get out, this doesn’t end happily for you.

  9. Why is this woman sharing her bizarre sexual fetishes with us? I don’t think I would employ someone so overtaken by their kink that they actually married to pursue it.

  10. From the article:
    She has written about how it was only when she married her husband, Jordan, that she realised the world treats her differently to him.

    It took marrying a black man for her to realise that people are treated differently?

    Jesus wept.

    It isn’t just race, dear. People are treated differently according to all sorts of factors.
    Walking through an airport dressed like a drug addicted skinhead thug gets you treated very differently to being smartly dressed in a suit.

    The woman is thick as a thick thing on a thick day.

  11. The Meissen Bison

    I wonder whether Genevieve Roth is excused anti-semitic tendencies written in at a cellular level.

  12. Race is an issue in our marriage because as a white woman of privilege, I have racist tendencies written in at a cellular level…

    Lol. Typical ‘ My Fellow White People’ behaviour. Every.Single.Time.

  13. Genevieve: Darling, would you mind doing the washing up tonight?
    Him: Are you aksing me coz I is black?

  14. So if it is written at a cellular level doesnt that mean we are all, regardless of skin colour, racist? Or does the lack of darker shade also mean we have this racist mutation? If thats the case albino’s need rounding up quick!

    Maybe its evolution. Where coloureds enslaved each other (and sell on to the white man) maybe it was to reduce the race enslaving its own?

    Or maybe this woman is talking out of the wrong end and god help her husband

  15. The daily mail article has more on it.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9395755/Marrying-husband-realise-racist-Harry-Meghans-new-strategist-says.html

    Like this bit
    She cited an example of how she mentioned to her husband, while they were driving to look for holiday homes, that their licence plates were nearly expired

    ‘He got so angry with me that I worried he would crash the car,’ Roth wrote.

    Her husband, she said, then explained to her: ‘Do you realize that if a cop pulls us over for expired tags, I could be killed?’

    So their licence plates were nearly expired? And why didn’t he keep an eye on this kind of thing as well? If he’s this worried about being shot for not paying road tax, then wouldn’t you make sure you were paid up?

    From reading the rest of the article, sounds like they both have issues. Like him pointing out streets where people have been killed…

    Sounds like they could be an ideal fit to me…

  16. “Race is an issue in our marriage because as a white woman of privilege, I have racist tendencies written in at a cellular level,”

    = He wanted to do scarfing to spice up our sex life, but kept saying “I can’t breathe…I can’t breathe”.

  17. It sounds to me like a black husband is putting his woman in her place. Maybe that’s something that happens at a cellular level.

    Or maybe it’s just the kind of shit you make up when you’re hoping for a high paying gig from the ex-Duchess 🙂

  18. “sounds like they both have issues”

    Very racist of me, but when I see assorted colours, that tends to be my assumption (doubly so if the ‘other’ colour comes from a different continent).

  19. “written in at a cellular level”: that sort of shite needs a name. How about ‘scientistic’? Or is there already a word for it? I have noticed football managers and CEOs bragging that they are going to change a club’s/company’s DNA. I don’t think they are experts in CRISPR.

  20. “as a white woman of privilege”: not all that white judging by the photos in the Mail. There seems to be a touch of the tar brush there.

    Anyway she used to work for la Clinton so necessarily she’s a bad ‘un.

  21. “written in at a cellular level”: that sort of shite needs a name. How about ‘scientistic’?

    Following the precedent that when muslims listening to their sky fairy do bad things it’s “islamist” not “islamic”, maybe we should use “scientifist”?

  22. She can talk all she likes, but until I see the reparations paid by her racist cells to the less privileged ones, I will ignore her bleating

  23. “She cited an example of how she mentioned to her husband, while they were driving to look for holiday homes, that their licence plates were nearly expired

    ‘He got so angry with me that I worried he would crash the car,’ Roth wrote.”

    Because it’s HER job to remember such things as licence plates that are about to expire, not HIS.

  24. “…It also rather doesn’t work. If the racism is written in at the cellular level then it’s as with sexual attraction, innate….”

    How often do I have to explain post-modernist thinking to you, Mr Worstall?

    1 – Truth is entirely relative
    2 – Truth depends on how you feel.
    3 – Race Activists feel strongly that Black people are very oppressed by Whites – so that is VERY true.
    4 – White people do not feel strongly that they are oppressing Blacks – so that is NOT very true.

    See how it works?

  25. Its textbook Critical Theory; individuals do not have agency but their actions are caused by structural racism/sexism/etc. This proves that Western civ is irredeemable and so must be torn down and replaced by the progressive’s Marxist dystopia.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *