Richard Murphy says:
May 23 2021 at 5:06 pm
The editor of the very well respected Health Services Journal called PHE an unreliable source today.
They have not released data on schools
The data released has been delayed by No 10 and I think you give it an optimistic reading
I am not questioning the scientists
I think PHE’s leadership is cowering to politicians and is plying to their eugenic agenda
They are failing us as a result
Research we consider
Health services research is a unique and multidisciplinary field of research that examines how social factors, financing systems, organizational structures and processes, health technologies, and behaviors impact on access to health care, the quality and cost of health care, and population health and wellbeing.
We particularly welcome submissions covering the following topics:
Designing and implementing health system reform
This section considers implementation science research examining the methods, trialing, and uptake of research into routine healthcare settings for the benefit of patient health. This section also considers research promoting healthcare reforms and the de-implementation of low-value care. Submissions that include public and patient involvement (PPI) or co-production in the research process are particularly encouraged.
eHealth, mHealth and informatics
This section considers all aspects of research relating to the design, development, trialing, adoption, and application of information technology, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and mobile health-based innovations in health service management, planning, and delivery of care.
Health policy, politics and power
This section considers all aspects of research concerning the decisions, plans, and actions that are undertaken to achieve specific healthcare goals in society. This section also considers studies on pharmaceutical policy, legislation, guidelines, and regulations that impact on health systems, services, and movements towards universal health coverage.
Health system quality and safety
This section considers all aspects of research concerning the review, monitoring, evaluation, communication, and achievement of high-level health system goals based on health system strategies. The section also encourages submissions evidencing improvement and innovation to advance the quality and safety of patient care at the health system and service level. Studies examining the perspectives of health systems, health care providers, service users, and caregivers are also considered.
*Studies concerning clinical practice, clinical decision-making, and measurement of clinical outcomes should be directed to the relevant BMC Series medical journal.
Healthcare delivery and access to healthcare
This section considers all aspects of research relating to the organization of people, institutions, and resources to deliver health care services to meet the healthcare needs of the population. This section particularly encourages submissions reporting advancing universal health coverage and healthcare equity. Geospatial and epidemiological studies related to healthcare delivery and access to healthcare are also considered.
Healthcare financing and economics
This section considers all aspects of research relating to the mobilization, accumulation, and allocation of money to finance the healthcare needs of people, individually and as a population. This section considers studies looking at the various models that exist to finance healthcare, such as private insurance, personal financing, social health insurance, and taxation. This section also considers economic and cost-effectiveness evaluations of health policy, interventions, performance, and services.
*Please note that the journal does not consider research focused on increasing for-profit healthcare revenue; monetizing healthcare or health data; or marketing for-profit healthcare.
Healthcare governance and management
This section considers all aspects of research that aims to inform best practice and continuous improvement for commissioners, decision-makers, and managers, for the benefit of service users and their carers. This section considers studies concerning risk assessments, upholding healthcare standards, incident management and reporting, and auditing.
The health workforce
This section considers all aspects of health workforce research including planning, resourcing and staffing, assessment of healthcare staff attitudes and behaviors, and occupational health and wellbeing of healthcare staff. Studies considered by this section include demographic and diversity studies, healthcare professional market analyses, methods to improve wellbeing, motivation, and productivity, and health workforce migration studies.
*For studies concerning the clinical knowledge and practice of healthcare professionals, please consider BMC Family Practice, BMC Medical Education, and BMC Nursing as possible venues for your research.
Just where you’d go for answers to the clinical effectiveness of vaccines, right?
their eugenic agenda
Tinfoil hat loony alert
PHE were proven liars with 23000 false claims of C19 death last year. Hand-Cock was supposed to be closing them. Then they were to be privatised and God knows what has happened since.
Time they were closed anyway. Whatever Murph is rambling about–I couldn’t be bothered reading it.
So it appears that Spud is lying about that as well. In fact it would be very odd if the Heath Services Journal held any view on the matter, given that it is about issues that affect health workers. Its view of studies on the efficacy of vaccines would be about as relevant as Spud’s views on economic policy or accounting standards or tax law or……….
On Twitter, he is unable to control the debate. A PHE guy is calling him out and he does not respond
“Eugenic agenda”? The Tories, whose voters (he complains) are mostly elderly (thus invalidating the Brexit vote), are deliberately bumping off the elderly? That doesn’t even make sense as a paranoid conspiracy theory.
FWIW PHE is an unreliable source, as is WHO. But its the influence of pharmaceutical companies and in the latter case foreign governments that make it so.
“Designing and implementing health system reform”
Ah. Central planning then?
No wonder it’s useless – not that Murphy would understand why, even though he thinks it.