That’s the important question here:
How big would Britain have to be for all its meat, milk and eggs to be ethically farmed?
Fascism is a set of ethics. Not an attractive set, I’ll grant you that, but it is a set. The mistake being made in the question is to accept that current Green, liberal metropolitan, set of ethics and being the only ethical system possible.
also baked into that question is that to be ethical the meat, milk and eggs have to be British and thus not so very far from your example of an unattractive set of ethics.
I bet all the vegans opposing eating eggs are fervent supporters of abortion. I’m just wondering what their attitude would be if Waitrose started offering human foetuses.
” … eggs have to be British”: what, no Rhode Island Reds?
Talking of Green ethics, when we lived in Oz there was a push from the Greens to exterminate ducks that were crossbreeds of local varieties and European. Similarly they wanted European trees and shrubs expunged. Positively Nazi!
Wrong question. ‘How big would Britain have to be for all its meat, milk and eggs to be ethically farmed?‘
Right question. How small would Britain’s population have to be for all its meat, milk and eggs to be ethically farmed?
Because smaller population of the Earth-plague that is Man is the objective of the Fascist Church of Environmentism and it’s cult of Climate-stasis.
Since I’d argue that Greenism is simply a form of Fascism, or at least Nazi-ism, I don’t think it makes much difference.
Testosterone-free fascism
So they’ll be getting a rabbi to bless all the agriculture, then?