A glorious explanation of The Sage³

Climate change requires collective action for a common good that is always going to be anathema to those on the right. Now we have due warning that the right wing are lining up to demand the right to take us to oblivion. The narratives need to be honed now.

Not actually an examination of what should be done. Not a pondering of the best method by which that should be done is done.

But hone the narrative – create the propaganda that is.

Or, as we might put it, what are the lies necessary to impose what we’ve already decided to do?

7 thoughts on “A glorious explanation of The Sage³”

  1. As the Chinese would in no way be described as being on ‘the right’ (except perhaps, by the likes of us who see them for what they really are), how does he propose we deal with this: “A total of 247 gigawatts of coal power is now in planning or development, nearly six times Germany’s entire coal-fired capacity. China has also proposed additional new coal plants that, if built, would generate 73.5 gigawatts of power, more than five times the 13.9 gigawatts proposed in the rest of the world combined. Last year, Chinese provinces granted construction approval to 47 gigawatts of coal power projects, more than three times the capacity permitted in 2019”.

    The UK has 3 (yes, just THREE) active coal fired power stations with a capacity of…… wait for it…….a massive 4.52Gw, and these will be switched off in 2024.

  2. “Climate change requires collective action for a common good …”

    No it doesn’t. The climate has changed all by itself for aeons. And the warmists’ entire hypothesis rests on the idea that we altered its course ourselves by accident, blinded by the quest for filthy profit.

    Catastrophic climate change might require collective action. But they’ll have to produce some evidence of that first.

    “ … that is always going to be anathema to those on the right.”

    So… let’s talk about how Nazis and fascists are the “far right” again, shall we?

  3. I see that the BBC is busy turning the “Climate Catastrophe” up to 11. I suppose that as the “Covid Catastrophy” starts to fade, at least until the winter, TPTB need something to keep the sheeple quiet and compliant.

    As far as I can see, if you remove the “adjustments” (which oddly are always downwards) from the historical temperature record there isn’t the slightest hint of catastrophic warming, just a very slight increase in line with the climb up from the Little Ice Age.

    Man-made global warming certainly exists, just not in the way “they” want you to believe.

  4. Does “collective action” extend to the carbon footprint of a single person who lives in a home with FOUR bedrooms and TWO public rooms and who is known to fly here there and everywhere to attend various overseas conferences covering a wide variety of spurious topics?

    CVNT

  5. But hone the narrative – create the propaganda that is.

    Or, as we might put it, what are the lies necessary to impose what we’ve already decided to do?

    The Knobhead³ is simply stating the obvious; that which he has observed is already occurring.
    It’s an explanation of the left. They have advanced skills and it’s working brilliantly.

    He must be deeply aggravated at being so peripheral to it.

  6. No amount of “narrative” bullshit will cut it in the face of plans to ruin us by thieving taxes and assorted robberies /tyrannies. The backlash is already under weigh and the fear of suffocating death is the only Project Fear scam they have so far got working. Greenscum have told too many lies and lies–as with Obama’s beach house–that they brazenly don’t believe themselves.

    “We’re all in it together” is one of the most shite slogans of all time. Unless you add “Mugs” on the end and then it is spot on.

  7. I find “for the common good” to be the most chilling phrase in the English language. How many people were murdered in the last century seemingly “for the common good”?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *