Skip to content

Sometimes trans matters and sometimes it doesn’t

Guess who seems not to agree so much?

In what the charity describes as a “best-practice guide” produced by the trust, it advises: “If a female (who was once male and has a past history of sexual assaults on women) needed admission to a female ward then she should be treated as any other patient and a thorough risk assessment be carried out”.

Staff are also told in the document that they “should be very careful” if they are refusing someone who identifies as a woman from a female-only ward, adding: “Just bear in mind you would be in more trouble for denying someone’s rights!”

This leading to:

She said that in one mental health trust, a male-born patient who identified as a woman had sexually assaulted patients on a female-only ward on two separate admissions, despite staff raising concerns.

The comments come after an investigation by The Telegraph found that guidance from trusts included that sex offenders who self-identified as women could be placed on female-only wards.

As with every other variation in humanity sometimes the variation matters and sometimes it doesn’t.

To be ridiculously extreme, paedophilia doesn’t matter when deciding who gets to buy a ham sandwich, does when detailing who leads the next cub scout camping trip. Trans doesn’t matter – as a distinction we’ve got to make – in near all of life but it dos sometimes. Just like everything else – the trick is working out when it does.

12 thoughts on “Sometimes trans matters and sometimes it doesn’t”

  1. Just bear in mind you would be in more trouble for denying someone’s rights! (than letting a woman get raped).

    Progressivism is a disease.

  2. I’m only a dumb engineer, but to me “a thorough risk assessment be carried out” is code for “we’re doing something with potentially bad consequences, put it in writing and get it signed off so our arse is covered”.

  3. It is the same issue we saw with the Manchester Arena bombing. It is just disappointing that there is still the intimidation away from doing the right thing.

    (And the fellow who did ignore the islamic terrorist, did indeed suffer less consequences from letting loads of children die, than he would have experienced from doing his job.)

  4. in one mental health trust, a male-born patient who identified as a woman had sexually assaulted patients on a female-only ward on two separate admissions

    Rapey tranny in mental health ward. Good luck to the psychiatrist trying to fix that one.

  5. Rapey tranny in mental health ward. Good luck to the psychiatrist trying to fix that one.

    Given the prevalence of this sort of reality defying nonsense in the health professions I suspect that most psychiatrists think there’s nothing to fix. Society just needs to be less transphobic and judgemental about xir’s inherent rapey nature.

    Hang ’em all.

  6. Hmm- BBC piece about period myths. Ok sure, probably lots of apocryphal stuff and anecdata floating about that needs to be dispelled, but oh no. myth number one – “only women get periods” Inform, Educate, entertain. my arse.

    “https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/4HDcgFZ9whsBWrK75yyzdLG/five-period-myths-debunked

  7. To be ridiculously extreme, paedophilia doesn’t matter . . .

    It’s not ridiculously extreme. The normalisation of paedophilia is the ultimate goal of this warping of sexual norms; it has already been floated that paedoness is just another sexual orientation. The overriding Orwellian purpose is to force the regular folk into expressing acceptance of what they know isn’t true; to make them live a lie. If they (Marxists / Satanists / Whatevists) can make people accept the fiddling of their kids then they’ll know they’ve succeeded.

    Sounds crazy, huh? Just think how far things have gone in the last fifteen years. In fifteen years time you’ll have the pregnant wife of the PM saying he supports paedo rights in a speech at the Tory party conference.

  8. Dennis, Not Being Sarcastic At All

    Perhaps Carrie Marshall could provide us with a nuanced approach to solving the problem.

  9. Sounds crazy, huh? Just think how far things have gone in the last fifteen years. In fifteen years time you’ll have the pregnant wife of the PM saying he supports paedo rights in a speech at the Tory party conference.

    A few years ago I’d have argued against such slippery slope arguments, but since the Infraudulation of Pedo Joe Biden I fear your view is prescient rather than hyperbole. It seems like the only thing which will stop the Pedo Rights Movement is an Ecksian purge with the politicos and their pedo enablers swinging from the lamp posts of SW1 by piano wire.

    A Romanesque blood letting by the mob seems to be the only way of stopping these pedo scumbags and their political enablers.

  10. @HB
    The Beeb’s argument seems to be that “not all women get periods” therefore it’s wrong to say that “only women get periods”. They can’t even handle basic logic.

  11. Staff:If a Desperate-Dan-in-Drag arrives on your ward have a quiet word and make sure he understands that if he kicks off in even the slightest he WILL lose his dick via boot-stomp rather than surgery. Use a Wedgewood-Benn anti-recording magnet set-up to stop any hidden camera crap.

    Mr Galt is correct–a massive Purge is needed. But with Bogus Johnson that is not happening.

    The good news is that Bogus is now at the end of minimum pain to UK mugs. From now on ALL his shite both hurts and costs. Large scale ruin of ord folk is the name of the game and even mugs wont be able to hide any more. Time to stop paying council tax from next year and work out what greenfreak shite subs cost us and deduct that from energy bills. Stop using E10 shite and deduct what extra they are charging for E5 petrol off the energy/council bills

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Can you help support The Blog? If you can spare a few pounds you can donate to our fundraising campaign below. All donations are greatly appreciated and go towards our server, security and software costs. 25,000 people per day read our sites and every penny goes towards our fight against for independent journalism. We don't take a wage and do what we do because we enjoy it and hope our readers enjoy it too.