(Of course, not everyone who menstruates identifies is female and not every cis female menstruates, but the majority of those affected by period poverty are female-identifying.)


19 thoughts on “Snigger”

  1. There is no such thing as cis female or female identifying. This insane ideology has decided to label everyone else and the rest of us need to push back against it. The word this moron is looking for is ‘woman.’

  2. Longrider, the only response to people making such utterances is “Fuck off.”
    It’s about time we told more people to fuck off. Regularly.

  3. @Henry
    I quite like the Scottish one, as was recently in the headlines being sung to Sturgeon
    “Get tae f*ck!”

  4. So…men and women…I think that’s what they used to be called.

    The sooner this woke b/s is brought to an end by its own internal inconsistencies, the better.

  5. Bloke in North Dorset

    Talking of JK Rowling, this both amused and restored a bit of faith in my fellow citizens:

    Oh dear. There seems to be something of an ongoing campaign against JK Rowling at the moment. The Harry Potter writer has dared to continue speaking out about her views on sex and gender in recent months, earning the ire of the Twitter commentariat in the process.

    First, her credit was downsized to being barely visible in the trailer for the forthcoming Fantastic Beasts sequel. And now the Guardian has pulled entries to its online ‘Person of the Year’ competition after Rowling proved to be the runaway favourite from supporters writing in to nominate her name. Whoops!

    The newspaper launched its poll on 15 December in an article about Time magazine’s decision to award Elon Musk the title of ‘person of the year.’ At the end of the article was a poll, asking readers ‘Who would be your 2021 person of the year, and why?’ Responses flooded in, with Rowling quickly taking the top spot.


    But then the Guardian mysteriously closed all entries, deactivating its submission form without any reason or explanation. Could it be because right-on hacks wanted to be spared the embarrassment of recognising Britain’s most famous living writer? Graun hacks themselves have strong views on this issue – as Mr S has reported previously in 2021.

    Disapparation isn’t just confined to Hogsmeade it seems.

  6. Recall Rowling was happy to redefine marriage as involving not merely peeps of the opposite sex. But now there’s a step further, a redefinition she doesn’t like. Not an ally worth having.

  7. Make Dumbledore gay and Hermione black because there’s brownie points and money in it, and reap what you sow.

  8. So JK isn’t sufficiently idiologically sound that we should dismiss her out of hand as not being worthy?
    I’m glad that one of Britain’s most popular and prominent authors has had the cojones to stand up and be counted. Despite the death threats and the vitriol from the media establishment she has stood firm and not caved. We need more like her.

  9. The writer might not take this seriously or even be all that aware of such nonsense. They probably have a sub-editor who inserts the woke or climate word-salad into all articles. It’s probably better than death by Twitter.

  10. Really don’t get the obsession with pronouns and including them on email, really makes no difference to the content of the email

  11. @BlokeinBrum +1

    I might not agree with much else Rowling says but she is one of a few high profile people to stand up against the tranny madness, and in the face of vile threats and abuse.

  12. She was quite happy to see the Jews, Union members, Roma, Communists and gays dragged off to the gas chambers but has now decided to stand up against tyranny and become a beacon of free speech. But only for the things she agrees with.

    Just as bad as all the other woke nutters and she should be treated as such.

  13. Addolff… I don’t think that Ms Rowling is old enough to have been content with the atrocities that you indicate.. Either that or you’re being heavily ironic and I have my “american” hat on this morning.

  14. BJ, I am pretty sure that Addolff is referencing Diettrich Bonhoeffer; your tax demand from the IRS will be with you shortly 🙂

  15. Addolff: find your friends where you can. However it’s a bit sad that someone who spots that this particular nuttery is just that can’t also see all the other nuttery for what it is too.

  16. “but the majority of those affected by period poverty are female-identifying”

    One could read that as admitting that those who are female-identifying are the weaker sex. 😉


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *