Skip to content

So, everyone should release reports for stakeholders and civil society to get their teeth into. Will increase corporate valuations by goodthought.

Antofagasta releases a tax report showing lots and lots of tax paid. Shares drop 5%.

So, the value of ESG is what?

10 thoughts on “Work elsewhere”

  1. Must confess I feel that the company should be concerned with the welfare of the shareholders, not stakeholders.

  2. Shareholders got a report that gave them more information about the company. Some of them read it and realised they should sell. Sounds pretty useful. Better than not knowing how much tax the company paid and over-valuing it.

  3. “So, the value of ESG is what?”

    It may result in share prices for non-compliant firms being lower. I may be looking to invest in a couple of years, perhaps in oil, gas, coal, uranium, booze, fags, weapon makers, and usurers. Is there any other anti-woke line of business anyone would like to suggest?

  4. When did language get turned upsidedown like this? Stakeholders were those that hold the stakes on behalf of participants – a completely neutral party not involved in the proceedings, so trusted by both sides. When, and how, did it turn into those that have a stake in the proceedings, ie, completely the OPPOSITE of neutral intermediary?

  5. @dearieme

    “Is there any other anti-woke line of business anyone would like to suggest?”

    Bookies

  6. BiND,

    “Fees on ESG Aware are 0.15%, their basic S&P500 tracker charges just 0.03%.”

    Woke-scam aside, isn’t it incredible how far fees have fallen? Twenty years ago you’d have been paying well over 0.5% for a basic index-tracker.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *