Skip to content

Jolyoloyon gets it wrong again

For immediate release 18 August 2022

Good Law Project issues judicial review after contracting authority ‘unlawfully’ awarded £70bn public sector net zero procurement process

Good Law Project has filed a judicial review against contracting authority East of England Broadband Network (E2BN) after it handed over a £70 billion procurement process to a Cornwall-based ‘micro-company’ specialising in education services.

E2BN’s ‘Everything Net Zero’ is a framework agreement that offers the UK’s entire public sector, from the NHS to local government offices, a way to award contracts even loosely connected to ‘climate’ issues without having to comply with the usual rules about public procurement. Despite covering up to £70 billion, management of the framework agreement has been handed over to just one company – a consultancy called Place Group, listed by Companies House as a ‘micro-company’ run by two directors in Penzance, Cornwall, with net assets of just under £350,000.

Jo Maugham, Director of Good Law Project, said:

‘The drive to achieve Net Zero is one of the most important challenges the UK faces today. Why was E2BN, ‘a regional broadband consortium’, allowed to write such a poor example of a framework agreement and to make a decision that could have such a far-reaching impact on the UK’s climate response? Why did they decide to outsource control over billions of pounds in emissions reductions contracts to the Place Group, a tiny company whose main experience seems to be in the education sector? Why was Place Group the only company to submit a tender? These are vital questions the public deserves to have an answer to and which E2BN has so far refused to answer.’

Good Law Project is bringing this action as E2BN’s decisions and conduct in respect of the Everything Net Zero Framework appear to be in breach of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. As it currently stands, it seems that billions of pounds worth of public contracts could be awarded by the Place Group to unspecified suppliers without open, transparent and fair competition. GLP has asked the Court to hold proceedings for a month to give E2BN another chance to provide proper answers.

In July, GLP along with Joanna Wheatley, Client Earth and Friends of the Earth successfully sued the Government over its strategy for delivering on its Net Zero targets, on the basis proposals were too vague and lacked enough detail. GLP will continue to campaign for accountability and transparency where the Government’s approach to the climate crisis is concerned, including its procurement process.

Ignorant twat. That’s the PR emiakl. And here’s the reality:

The government has not awarded a £70 billion net zero contract to a small Cornish company

This is not right. A not-for-profit group of local councils in the East of England has selected a company registered in Cornwall (which said it had an average of two employees in 2019) to run tender competitions for contracts for the public sector bodies like schools and hospitals to achieve their net zero goals. The maximum amount that can be procured through it is £70 billion, but the company has not been given this amount of money from the government.

They don’t even decide upon the tenders, not even write them. They organise the tendering process. Who would like to tender for this fine contract? The docs you need are over there. The bidding process is this. That’s the final date, these over there are the folk who will decide.

Soapy Joe’s a fuckwit.

7 thoughts on “Jolyoloyon gets it wrong again”

  1. Yeah gods!
    A couple of years ago we (parish council) paid a few grand to somebody to write our toilet management contracts. Not to manage the toilets, to write the contracts and monitoring processes the people managing our toilets would have to adhere to. Because We Have No Experience Writing Outsourcing Contracts. So, just as we don’t try and fix our own roof, we pay somebody else to do it. Damn fine job they did as well.

  2. Bloke in North Dorset


    Or better still, let’s see if we can crowd fund a one way ticket and make sure he’s wearing his Kimono?

  3. There’s a need for – an Even Better Law Project to campaign for the establishment of a new crime of Corporate Barratry.

  4. Originally I was gobsmacked that a “silk” could be so bloody stupid and inept… Then it dawned on me that the twat is paid his full fees and “refreshers” by the “Good Law Project” which is essentially funded by moronic lefties and remainers. So in fact, the bloke is a near-genius, getting paid loads of wonga for making a show of fighting vexatious or unwinnable cases (that probably don’t need much effort therefore) and whether he wins or loses is irrelevant – he gets paid his QC-scale fees regardless.

  5. One doesn’t have to be smart to be a QC. It isn’t lime getting promoted into Division One because you scored 90 points in a season.

    As Rumpole put it about Guthrie Featherstone, “losing at golf to all the right people.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *