Skip to content

But what will happen in England? The likelihood that the Tories will be replaced by a fascist party, which could easily attract 30% of the vote, is high. I strongly suspect that this will happen.

30% of the English are fascists? At which point, well, what price democracy? Or is that something we’re not allowed to have if large numbers of people have the wrong ideas?

And where’s that Curajus State if the people are so misguided?

19 thoughts on “Really?”

  1. Nonsense. There has to be an established “fascist” party for people to vote for, and there isn’t one. Large parties don’t spring into existence overnight. Even if all the right wingers in the Conservative party struck out on their own, they’d still all fit in one taxi.

  2. Crikey. He better hope that post doesn’t get too widely disseminated on the web. The amount of people falling to the floor on their knees with their hands clasped in prayer might surprise him.

  3. I’m amused by this as well:

    The platform for this ‘something else’ party that is required is not hard to imagine. It will be pro-Europe. It will be green. It will reject neoliberal balanced budget mantras, and manage the economy with the aim of full employment.

    It will support redistribution. It will be intensely pro-investment in a sustainable future. It will be accountable. It will deliver electoral reform.

    So parsing this I am seeing his proposal for a party which

    – Advocates rejoining the EU on less favourable terms than before
    – Advocates rolling power cuts and severe restrictions on ordinary people’s leisure activities
    – Advocates public expenditure which is unfinanced and continuing inflation
    – Is biased in favour of public sector employees
    – Plans on confiscatory levels of taxation to pay for people that are non-productive
    – Plans excessive Green taxes
    – Wants to change the electoral system to PR

    Does he imagine any party with such an outlook will appeal to anyone beyond a tiny circle of like minded academics?

  4. The Italian historian Emilio Gentile posited the following characteristics of ‘Fascism’ as an ideology

    1/ a mass movement with multiclass membership in which prevail, among the leaders and the militants, the middle sectors, in large part new to political activity, organized as a party militia, that bases its identity not on social hierarchy or class origin but on a sense of comradeship, believes itself invested with a mission of national regeneration, considers itself in a state of war against political adversaries and aims at conquering a monopoly of political power by using terror, parliamentary politics, and deals with leading groups, to create a new regime that destroys parliamentary democracy;

    Murphy has frequently called for overthrow of the current electoral system and has often advocated violence against political opponents. He is obsessed with the idea of the complete renewal of society along ‘Green’ lines and the need to completely remake it

    2/ an “anti-ideological” and pragmatic ideology that proclaims itself antimaterialist, anti-individualist, antiliberal, antidemocratic, anti-Marxist, is populist and anticapitalist in tendency, expresses itself aesthetically more than theoretically by means of a new political style and by myths, rites, and symbols as a lay religion designed to acculturate, socialize, and integrate the faith of the masses with the goal of creating a “new man”;

    Murphy styles himself as beyond the constraints of conventional economics and ideology and as such believes that his ideology is in some way novel and has a unique insight into the way British society should be constructed. He believes in mythical concepts like ‘Tax Justice’, ‘Sustainable accounting’ and other various theories he himself has generated

    a totalitarian conception of the primacy of politics, conceived of as an integrating experience to carry out the fusion of the individual and the masses in the organic and mystical unity of the nation as an ethnic and moral community, adopting measures of discrimination and persecution against those considered to be outside this community either as enemies of the regime or members of races considered to be inferior or otherwise dangerous for the integrity of the nation;

    Murphy regular suggests the deplatforming and removing the right to free speech of those he deems ‘fascist’ (in an interesting inversion of reality) He has blocked 20,000 people on Twitter and barred numerous people from his blog. He advocates confiscatory levels of taxation and extensive state confiscation of private property as a means to increasing state power.

    a single state party that has the task of providing for the armed defense of the regime, selecting its directing cadres, and organizing the masses within the state in a process of permanent mobilization of emotion and faith;

    Murphy regularly bemoans (even on this Twitter thread) the inability of the current political movements to adhere to his vision of societal renewal. He constantly advocates the need for a new movement or party to best emobody that vision.

    corporative organization of the economy that suppresses trade union liberty, broadens the sphere of state intervention, and seeks to achieve, by principles of technocracy and solidarity, the collaboration of the “productive sectors” under control of the regime, to achieve its goals of power, yet preserving private property and class divisions;

    He would forbid people not to join a Trade Union and insist on Union control in all aspects of the economy but otherwise has advocated nationalization of all private activity and indeed even the entire housing stock of the country.

    Therefore, for him to bemoan the possible emergence of ‘fascism’ when he himself embodies much of the ideological characteristics of it is rich indeed….

  5. Roué le Jour,

    In France, Macron conjured up his “En Marche” party in 2016; and went on to win the presidency in 2017. So there is precedent, if the leader has brains, experience, and is well-connected.

    Conversely, it took 50 years for the Le Pen family party to reach an all-time high of 41.45% in the second round of the most 2022 presidential election. Extremist parties just aren’t all that popular, as their label suggests.

  6. Andrew M

    But France lives with a dozen or more parties. One more makes little difference.

    The UK doesn’t have such a large number of parties, so building one of weight and substance is very unlikely to happen between one election and the next.

    But indeed the Conservative party seems to have no desire whatsoever to govern, let alone to govern well.

  7. Extremist parties just aren’t all that popular, as their label suggests.
    I really wouldn’t count on that. Despite the total animosity shown to them by all & sundry, the BNP didn’t do all that bad in certain constituencies.
    It really depends how much shit the current crop of politicians throw at the voting public & what you mean by extreme. There are a lot of views that are labelled “extreme” that are held by a sizeable number if not a majority of the public. It’s just that they don’t get widely voiced because the platform to voice them on is denied. Each person thinks they’re in a minority. If they throw just too much & the lid pops off of that, people might wake up & find they’re not in a minority. Then it depends on what those issues are, how strongly people feel about them & what they willing to trade off on things they don’t much agree with to get something done about them. And who’s offering the solutions. It’ll be another case of voting for the least worse party.

  8. Good point about Marine. If the French presidentials were being held now, she’d walk it. A lot of her stuff was being labelled extreme aren’t extreme now, are they?

  9. Only 30% fascist in Blighty? HA! Here in Left Pondia we have a full 50% fascist. By edict of Emperor Joe Palp-a-teen.

  10. Extremist parties just aren’t all that popular

    FPTP is distinctly inimical to new parties “breaking through” but if you consider Nigel Fartage’s UKIP to have been extremist, then consider their showing in the 2014 Euro elections conducted under proportional representation and party lists (as in France) in which they came top with almost 30% of the vote.

  11. So parsing this I am seeing his proposal for a party which

    – Advocates rejoining the EU on less favourable terms than before
    – Advocates rolling power cuts and severe restrictions on ordinary people’s leisure activities
    – Advocates public expenditure which is unfinanced and continuing inflation
    – Is biased in favour of public sector employees
    – Plans on confiscatory levels of taxation to pay for people that are non-productive
    – Plans excessive Green taxes
    – Wants to change the electoral system to PR

    Does he imagine any party with such an outlook will appeal to anyone beyond a tiny circle of like minded academics?

    Isn’t this just the LibDem manifesto?

  12. Dennis, Tiresome Denizen of Central Ohio

    The likelihood that the Tories will be replaced by a fascist party, which could easily attract 30% of the vote, is high. I strongly suspect that this will happen.

    So Murphy is predicting Jeremy Corbyn is returning to lead Labour and that Labour will win?

  13. Btw, speaking of fascism:

    A group of Conservative police commissioners is calling for cannabis to be reclassified from a Class B to a Class A drug.

    This would put it in the same category as heroin, cocaine and ecstasy.

    It would mean tougher penalties for possession, and potential life sentences for suppliers and producers.

    Just what we need: throw a bunch of bohemian middle class people, students and chilled out black guys in jail.

  14. “Fascist Party” according to El Spud Royale: Any party that consigns my Infallible Plans and Sage Advise to the incinerator.

    But let’s see.. party program…

    – Finish Brexit, then see where the chips fall and deal with it.
    – Turn Universities back into Universities, re-establish trade schools, defund Basket-Weaving “subjects” and departments offering them.
    – Apply the “95%+ = Normal” rule to any issue, work from that principle, and sort out exceptions later if necessary.
    – Toss the BBC to the wolves. If there must be a state broadcaster, it shall be an information outlet for the state, other opinions are free to fund/broadcast their fetish somewhere else.
    – Ship illegal immigrants back to where they came from. Ramsgate/Dover to Calais is a short hop, after all.
    – Actions/competence have consequences for Civil Servants. Meritocracy has its merits.
    – Reform and possibly nationalise those systems that are necessary for the functioning of the nation.
    Power, water supply, waste treatment, transportation. Private/institutional investors are welcome to a stake, but the infrastructure itself is too important to leave to markets alone.
    The Meritocracy thing counts twice here.

    Stuff like that..

    I’m sure peeps here can come up with more detailed/additional points.
    But something along those lines would get a fair number of votes, and even if the party wouldn’t get a single seat because FPTP, it would draw enough votes away to Upset Things.
    And with a bit of luck can turn the whole “popular vote” argument against the Socialists…

    Ah well… dreams.. And I’m a furriner without a vote anyway..

  15. But what will happen in England? The likelihood that the Tories will be replaced by a fascist party,

    The idea that the Establishment would ever permit the English people to organise in their own self-interest is laughable…

  16. a fascist party, which could easily attract 30% of the vote

    You’d expect more than a democratic vote to implement fascism, wouldn’t you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *