But these issues were being (actively) ignored by (white) environmental activists, who were focusing instead on their stock-in-trade issues: biodiversity, conservation and climate change (not climate justice). Further reinforcing the exclusivity of white environmental activist agendas, those employed in the environmental and emerging sustainability policy arenas were almost entirely white.
We’re talking about the environment. However stupid most of these ideas are – and the people too – it’s the environment that is being discussed. Not social justice nor racial equity. So, it should be effects upon the environment – not social nor racial justice nor equity – that are the measure of success.
And?
As always, whatever the grift, it must be done in favour of and by BLACK activists. The very existence of a white skin proves that BLACKS are not getting 10 000% of all available funds.
If we’re talking about climate justice, when am I going to be compensated for the fact that as a Brit I can’t see most interesting astronomical events because of clouds whereas sub-Saharan Africans get glorious clear skies?
Whites invent Industrial Revolution, brown people hardest hit.
“As always, whatever the grift, it must be done in favour of and by BLACK activists”
Eventually people will start laughing at all this stuff in the same way as they did with I only want to help you Ro-land
Boganboy has it – it is all about racial privilege. In their eyes as a White person you have it and they want it. Scratch the surface of almost anyone invested in DEI and you’ll either find someone filled with intense self-loathing (If they are white) or someone who actively hates White people. At the moment there is still some stigma attached to overt anti-white racism but it is diminishing. Given the contrasting reactions to the conflagrations in Ukraine and Ethiopia I can’t help thinking that among the WEF, UN, Supranational Government and Remainer circles that it’s pretty much essential to be anti- white to get employment
Comments are closed.