Skip to content

A review

Today, I learnt that Meghan is fascinated by how our brains are wired. She keeps a big pile of clever books by her bed, including one “which posited the concept of neuroplasticity”, and these books made her think about herself, as you’d expect.

It’s very good this review:

She broadens the conversation to include other residents of Montecito. Her husband told her that if we want to shift how we think about gender then we have to actively include men in the conversation and everything I have ever read about Prince Harry makes me certain he said that.

A very good review – in one meaning of that phrase, even if not the other.

If anyone asks, “Are you being a person in the world in the most nuanced and real way?” the correct answer is not WTF.

Snigger:

Meghan’s conclusion is that her podcast has made her feel Seen, and seeing as she’s spent 40-odd years jumping up and down trying to catch our attention, this is reassuring.

17 thoughts on “A review”

  1. Put the following in the correct order: candid illuminating enlightening stirring in depth vulnerable energising dynamic raw refreshing. Or put them in the blender and blitz until they form a podcast.

    Very good review!

  2. I’ve always found it interesting when celebrities of this kind read a couple books to become an “expert” rather than actually become an expert. As if they don’t have the spare time.

    Another interesting case is the actor Terrence Howard. He created his own branch of “mathematics” called Terryology. The pandering nature of Western society allowed him to present it at Oxford, and check out the phony British accent at 6:38.

    https://youtu.be/ca1vIYmGyYA

  3. “Her husband told her that if we want to shift how we think about gender…”

    I don’t, thanks all the same.

  4. Amazing. I’d sort of presumed Megan’s brain worked on steam or liquid chocolate under pressure or something. So pipes & valves rather than wiring. Learn something new every day.

  5. candid illuminating enlightening stirring in depth vulnerable energising dynamic raw refreshing

    That’s a lot of words to say (or avoid saying) “Uppity”.

  6. Theophrastus (2066)

    “Bravo The Times.”

    The Times is now a left-of-centre* rag for feminist refugees from The Guardian. I posted a detailed and wholly factual refutation of the claims that Brexit has been an “economic disaster” btl and it was deleted by “moderators” within 30 minutes…
    * the “centre” is a moveable feast…

  7. The Times has also censored comments by me recently. They contained neither blasphemy nor obscenity. From now on I suppose I should call it The Nazi Times. Or should it be the Nazi Guardian but the Fascist Times? Tricky.

  8. In the “good old days” The Times was characterised as a fount of Jewish propaganda by the Nazis, becuase backwards it is spells “Semit”.

    I guess these days it would be better described as “Parc”

  9. The celebrity word at the top confused me into thinking, “Who’s this Megan?”
    I see now, but do not consider this actress a celebrity since attempting to destroy the Royals with her useless consort. Utterly uninteresting self-promoting scum.

  10. I wondered what that idiot Basu was talking about when he said she was ‘under threat’ in the UK. She’s certainly under threat of being laughed and pointed at like we used to do at Bedlam, but I can’t think it was any more serious than that.

  11. She keeps a big pile of clever books by her bed, </i.

    No-one reads serious books in bed. You just nod off and miss stuff.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *