Skip to content

I prefer the other explanation

For hundreds of years, the glass slipper has been synonymous with the tale of Cinderella and her midnight dash home from the ball. Now an academic has traced its 17th-century origins and uncovered a connection to the creation of the Hall of Mirrors at the Palace of Versailles and the impractical fashions and fads of French aristocrats.

“The glass slipper is a witty joke,” said Genevieve Warwick, professor of the history of art at the University of Edinburgh. It was intended to be a “literary mascot of French economic modernity” and a tongue-in-cheek reference to Louis XIV’s love of extravagant and often quixotic French fashion, especially in regard to shoes, she told the Observer. “No one could actually walk, let alone dance, in shoes made of glass.”

For years that other explanation has been that there’s some witty pun between the French for glass slipper and the French for lady’s bits. So, the Prince finds lady’s bits that fit, loses them then searches to find them again. Finds, marries and happy ever after.

This other explanation might have even less truth to it than this new one but there we are, preference for a story is preference.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Chernyy Drakon
Chernyy Drakon
2 years ago

I read somewhere, can’t remember where, that the slippers were actually fur and it was a mistranslation.
French for ‘glassware’ is “verrerie”.
French for fur is “fourrure”.

Take with a heaping bowl of salt , but it sounds plausible and fur slippers make a lot more sense than glass ones.

Sam Vara
Sam Vara
2 years ago

“So, the Prince finds lady’s bits that fit, loses them then searches to find them again. Finds, marries and happy ever after.”

Well, until she goes up a couple of shoe sizes after popping out les enfants.

KyleT
KyleT
2 years ago

I once read that the glass slipper was a translation error – “vair”, a French word for fur being mis-read as “verre” – glass.
This might have a link to Tim’s explanation as the original story would involve a “furry slipper” (fnarr fnarr!).

Ottokring
Ottokring
2 years ago

I read about the fur/glass mix up when I was a kid.
In my innocence it never occurred to me that there was a naughty version… Did the Prince have to have a crack at the Ugly Sisters too ? Ewww…

If it had been Louis XIV’s brother, Buttons would have won the competition.

bloke in spain
bloke in spain
2 years ago

Can’t actually see any obstacle to a glass slipper. It’d only be a variation on the clog, wouldn’t it? It’s not as if stilettos were the fashion at the time. Mightn’t exactly be comfortable & possibly clatter a bit on marble floors. But when has impractical ever factored in women’s wear?
Got me thinking now. Wonder if I could produce & flog ’em? There’s a shop along the road makes & sells glass objects d’art. Maybe they’d be interested. Next stop Paris for the Spring Season. Don’t know about finding any virgin blonde kitchen maids to model them though. Bit of a European shortage of those.

Bloke in Wales
Bloke in Wales
2 years ago

Did the Prince have to have a crack at the Ugly Sisters too ? Ewww…

Maybe they were the 16th century inspiration for the Viz Fat Slags

PJF
PJF
2 years ago

Wonder if I could produce & flog ’em?

Liability insurance could be a problem, especially in the US.

PJF
PJF
2 years ago

Did the Prince have to have a crack at the Ugly Sisters too ?

Via panto they’re the original transwiminz, so the tightness issue could be, er, self healing. Not sure about the issue issue.

Ewww, indeed.

Bongo
Bongo
2 years ago

Stossel has a super little video up about comic book preferences
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Zi1cLJyBoQ
I did’t realise DC and Marvel had been changing their heroes ahem sexual predilections so as to gain righteous points and to lose market share. Well done them.

Can you help support The Blog? If you can spare a few pounds you can donate to our fundraising campaign below. All donations are greatly appreciated and go towards our server, security and software costs. 25,000 people per day read our sites and every penny goes towards our fight against for independent journalism. We don't take a wage and do what we do because we enjoy it and hope our readers enjoy it too.
11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x