Prince Harry: I want my father and brother back
Duke of Sussex claims Royal family unwilling to reconcile in trailers of hard-hitting interviews to promote tell-all memoir, Spare
You are entirely at liberty to choose who to spend your life with. And the very best of luck to you as you do so. The thing is, other people also have the same choice – up to and including reacting to your choices.
This is hardly the first time – even within your own family – that the choice for the marital bed has led to a certain distance from others in the family now, is it?
Charles has said that if Ginge & Whinge want to come to the coronation, they will be welcome. (Possibly had his fingers crossed behind his back.)
Should Harry attend, like all the Prince’s of the Royal House, he will have to kneel to Charles during the ceremony and give an oath of loyalty as his ‘liege-man of life and limb’.
Should be interesting – and then would Harry be guilty of perjury or treason? Spare room at the Tower being prepared.
Charles has said that if Ginge & Whinge want to come to the coronation, they will be welcome.
Didn’t a random black woman also accuse him of DAT’S RACISS (I know, lol), and the man who would be king immediately apologised and offered her a VIP ticket to his crowning, or some such pathetic nonsense?
Pretty sure everybody’s going to be there, including the tough kids at Gordonstoun who used to steal Charlie’s lunch money.
Harry’s problem is that he’s a thicko with a grudge. Shacking up with a woman who has sacrificed friends and family to climb up the greasy pole is just the icing on the cake. If Charles had any balls he’d withdraw their titles and let them rot.
. . . he will have to kneel to Charles during the ceremony and give an oath of loyalty as his ‘liege-man of life and limb’.
It’s more likely they’ll all be kneeling to black lives mattering.
The Duke of Sussex has said he wants to be reunited with the King and the Prince of Wales, but has claimed that they are unwilling to be reconciled with him.
Has the Torygraph placed an embargo on using the passive voice?