Skip to content

Man with two sons doesn’t understand sex

Second, we need to increase the number of younger people in our society, which only immigration can do.

??

29 thoughts on “Man with two sons doesn’t understand sex”

  1. Man With Two Sons Doesn’t Understand Sex

    Given the nature of the tuberous one, I’d agree with @M and suggest that “Daddy” may well be the milkman.

  2. From one comment, I saw that he claims to have been on antibiotics for 6 months last year. Perhaps that explains something

  3. From one comment, I saw that he claims to have been on antibiotics for 6 months last year. Perhaps that explains something

    I thought he kept catching the chinese flu. Is the NHS so incompetent it prescribes antibiotics for a viral infection?

  4. In fairness to even the tuberous one, having a viral infection, especially one where you are immuno-compromised by dodgy mRNA treatments pretending to be vaccines can lead to secondary bacterial infections since glands in your nose and sinuses accelerate mucus production in an effort to clear out the virus.

    The excess mucus creates a warm, wet breeding ground for bacteria, increasing your risk for a secondary infection (e.g., bronchitis, sinusitis or pneumonia) that may need to be treated with antibiotics, especially in the older, less active and more tuberous.

    Apart from twice daily walking the dog, I can’t imagine Ritchie is on much of a fitness regime…?

  5. having a viral infection, especially one where you are immuno-compromised by dodgy mRNA treatments pretending to be vaccines can lead to secondary bacterial infections since glands in your nose and sinuses accelerate mucus production in an effort to clear out the virus.

    Fair enough, learn something every day!

  6. The striking thing about pro-immigration bollocks is that it treats all foreigners as essentially identical, interchangeable units. It’s as if immigrants from Hong Kong would be no better, or no worse, a gamble than immigrants from Haiti.

    I don’t suppose many people are stupid enough to believe that but then why do they forever imply it? It’s a mystery.

    Similarly why do they avoid numbers? It seems to me there would be all the difference in the world between admitting 20,000 from China and 200,000,000. And yet the answer, apparently, is just MOAR.

  7. I wonder, whether linking your pension in someway to your grandkids tax contribution would help? Bit illiberal, granted, but it would re-establish one of the motivations for having higher than replacement in the first place.

  8. A chilling last paragraph in this one:

    But, and I stress it, the issues we need to face are structural and we are nowhere near addressing them as yet. In fact, the issues are never raised. But they should be. Justice demands it. I see a whole new career opening ahead of me.

    to channel Shakespeare:

    ‘Will noone rid me of this turbulent moron?’

  9. Dearieme

    Well when your explicit goal is the destruction of the country traditionally a fifth column of traitors is a good method of undermining it. So these pro immigration commentators and activists know that full well.

    Steve
    They tend to think they will be unaffected by ‘mild impositions’ like Sharia law – I’d ideally like to see Hardline Muslims moved in next to Owen Jones and see how ‘tolerant’ he really is…

  10. Well, as a native Englishman, if he’s looking volunteers to impregnate various of the delicately nurtured as a way of increasing ‘the young people in society’ then I would be happy to volunteer my services….if Mrs VA agrees that is…

  11. Mr.VA, there are two chances there, slim and none and slim just left town. (H/T Kingpin – Vanessa Angel…Woof……).

  12. – I’d ideally like to see Hardline Muslims moved in next to Owen Jones and see how ‘tolerant’ he really is…

    I’d prefer to see Owen Jones exported to live amongst hardline muslims so he can find out how tolerant they are.

  13. If we need more workers to fix the demographic problem we don’t need to accept the future liabilities too. The economic argument for immigration would allow people aged 20 to 45 here if they were working, zero benefits, make people pay for insurance, then kick them out. No citizenship for children etc. You avoid the expense of education at start of life and health costs at end of life. Arguing that for economic reasons you should give citizenship makes no sense, so economics is not driving this advocacy it is just a front, hence it must be some cultural goal.

  14. Theophrastus (2066)

    The UK does not need to import labour. There are 5.3m aged 16-64 on out-of-work benefits. So cut the number of work visas, reduce out-of-work benefits and increase the NMW. The 1m+ vacancies would be filled in short order.

  15. The UK does not need to import labour. There are 5.3m aged 16-64 on out-of-work benefits.

    Where do you think those 5.3m came from? Sure, some of them are the usual 3rd+ generation workshy, but Abdul and co. have picked up the trick and quite happy to accuse the Job Centre staff of Islamophobia at the drop of a hat to get them to lay off.

  16. Agreed, my point was just to show that even if you believed immigration was needed to fix a problem, you would have a very very different policy

  17. Bloke in North Dorset

    he economic argument for immigration would allow people aged 20 to 45 here if they were working, zero benefits, make people pay for insurance, then kick them out. No citizenship for children etc.

    That’s what we were told when young Pakistanis and Indians were brought over to try to save the northern mills. I’ve posted on here about how every step of the way if you objected to them first bringing wives over, then direct family, then extended families you were shouted down as racists, and that was the ’60s.

    As the young women of Rotherham and elsewhere how ell that experiment went.

  18. Britishvolt: we would be crazy to do something ourselves when foreigners will do it cheaper for us.

    Immigration: we should be crazy enough to try to do for ourselves what foreigners do for nothing.

    Make up your mind!

    And if you want to increase the number of 18-year old people, you can avoid immigration only if you’re willing to wait 18 years. It’s a bit like building a nuclear power station – a long term project.

  19. Bloke in the Fourth Reich

    I would absolutely support relocating Free Hong Kong to the UK. You could build it on reclaimed land next to Brighton. Or, even better, on top of Brighton.

    Keep it as a separate appendage, with border controls on the way in and out. UK passport holders get to stay 180 days, as now, then can just get the ferry to Free Macau (built on top of Portsmouth) and back again, another 180 days.

    The only fly in the ointment is that the one thing that sticks in Xi’s craw is that the greatest city in all China was founded by the British.

  20. @BIFR. Maybe if they stopped making it so difficult to have and keep kids when earning a decent wage we’d have more. Instead we’ve made it relatively easy to have and keep kids if you don’t work but difficult for those who contribute.

    Crowded conditions? The state will provide. Kids moved out? No need to downsize as the bedroom tax is evil. Kids having kids as single parents. No need to worry as the state will provide rather than your family.

    Unless you’re earnings 51k in which case we will take away your child benefit so you’ve an effective marginal rate of 90%!

  21. @Andrew Again
    “Unless you’re earnings 51k in which case we will take away your child benefit so you’ve an effective marginal rate of 90%!”
    If you are earning £51 k then put an extra £1k in the pension.
    Thanks George for encouraging me to put more into my pension

  22. From one comment, I saw that he claims to have been on antibiotics for 6 months last year.

    Well, he’s certainly not on antidiotics.

  23. We likely could reverse these trends, but we Deplorable types would just have Deplorable kids, while the immigrants are a much safer woke-vote contingent.

    They want kids – just not OUR kids.

  24. I remember a time when there was going to be so many of us that we would be standing shoulder to shoulder and there would be no room to grow food.We were all doomed. Now it seems that the population is dropping to “sustainable ” levels but we are still doomed.Can the doom mongers please make up their minds (if they can find them) and tell us which they prefer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *