This is really very amusing indeed. Nesrine Malik:
The old boys’ club. We don’t hear about it as much as we used to, do we? The phrase seems a little dusty, a bit of a throwback. Harrovians, Etonians, Wykehamists and other privately educated politicians may constitute 80% of Britain’s prime ministers so far; but they increasingly sit cheek by jowl in parliament with others who did not go to fee-paying schools, are not male, not white – and not only did not go to Oxbridge, but are not university educated at all.
And yet here we are, riffling through the seedy dealings of a small connected group of people at the top.
From the disgraced former party chair to the Richard Sharp investigation, government failure stems from a network of private schools and elite universities
Now, the subject of this ire is Nadhim Zahawi.
When he was eleven years old, during Saddam Hussein’s early years in power, he and his family fled to the UK.[15] Zahawi was educated at Holland Park School,[1][16] before moving to Ibstock Place School and then at King’s College School, an independent school in Wimbledon, London, followed by University College London, where he earned a BSc degree in chemical engineering in 1988.[1][17]
Not the traditional definition of the early years of the British Establishment.
The critics of that establishment:
Harris was raised in Wilmslow in north Cheshire; his father was a university lecturer in nuclear engineering,[1] and his mother a teacher who was the daughter of a nuclear research chemist. He became fixated by pop music at an early age.
He attended the comprehensive Wilmslow County High School (at the same time as members of the band Doves[2]), then went to Loreto College, Manchester, a Roman Catholic sixth form college sited between the University of Manchester and Old Trafford.[3] He applied to study Modern History at Keble College, Oxford, but was rejected, and claimed his membership of left-wing organisations had not won him many favours with such a traditional and conservative college.[3] He spent three years studying Philosophy, Politics and Economics at another Oxford college, Queen’s, between 1989 and 1992.
That’s more traditional, isn’t it?
Malik was born in Khartoum, Sudan, and was raised in Kenya, Egypt and Saudi Arabia.[2][3] She attended The American University in Cairo and the University of Khartoum as an undergraduate, and completed her post-graduate study at the University of London.[3][4]
Career
Alongside her career as a journalist, Malik spent ten years in emerging markets private equity.
That’s another outsider making it in.
And yes, being a regular columnist – not just the occasional column, but on contract for a long piece a week – at a major newspaper like The Guardian does make you part of the British Establishment. The description has no meaning at all if those in such positions are not part of it.
We’ve the Oxbridge son of scientists – most haute bourgeois that is – now posing as a yokel from Frome, the immigrant Arab via banking to media stardom both complaining bitterly about the Kurdish refugee who went to Holland Park Comprehensive and still succeeded.
That all three are indeed part of the Establishment seems to indicate that it’s a fairly porous thing. Given the people involved we’d hesitate to call it a meritocracy but it’s definitely porous.
And yet the actual complaint being made is that it’s restricted in membership, that Establishment. Which is to laugh, no?
Which is as it has been historically. A Wide Boy on the make has always been able to get ahead in England. We never actually did have that blocking off of the ascension of the heights that so afflicted many other European countries.
Jeez, does no one recall Widmerpool?
I dunno. Holland Park and Kings Wimbledon along with the two Dulwich schools are definitely parts of the “new” establishment
( I was sure that Nigel Havers went to KC. But apparently not )
Should I call Sir Francis Drake a wide boy on the make? Then again, I suppose you could call Bill the Bastard a wide boy as well.
Widmerpool?
An odious prick, undoubtedly, but iirc he went to a thinly-disguised Eton.
Not really an outsider then.
He applied to study Modern History at Keble College, Oxford, but was rejected, and claimed his membership of left-wing organisations had not won him many favours with such a traditional and conservative college.
John Harris self-identifies as a victim.
He spent three years studying Philosophy, Politics and Economics at another Oxford college, Queen’s
Perhaps the answer is in the course of study: modern history may be less amenable to a student’s preconceived ideologies and more rigorous than PPE, that famous Oxford macedoine of vacuity.
Thomas Cromwell is a good historic archetype for this, but plenty of powerful families in Tudor times had worked their way up over a couple of generations of the wool trade or whatever.
Anon
His ex-boss, Cardinal Wolsey, the buthcher’s boy from Ipswich, is an even better example.
*Zahawi was born in Baghdad, Iraq, to a prominent family from Khanaqin within the Kurdish Feyli tribe.[6][7] His father is Hareth Nadhim Al Zahawi (born 1942), a British-Iraqi businessman who established the Al-Zahawi Group, which after the US invasion of 2003 obtained a contract to provide logistics, cleaning and support services to the new US-led interim government.[8] Now known as IPBD (“Iraq Project and Business Development”), its interests have expanded to cover steel manufacturing and property development,[9] and generally “supporting the reconstruction effort”.[10] His father is also a director of Balshore Investments Ltd, Gibraltar,[11] and in 2022 was resident in Lebanon with his wife Najdat, both British citizens.[12] His paternal grandfather was Nadhim al-Zahawi, Governor of the Central Bank of Iraq from 1959 to 1960, and Minister of Trade.[13][14]”
Of course he is a member of the estabishment just like you Tim you fuckwit.
Cromwell made it for a while but he was always regarded as white trash by Norfolk and others. And when the brown stuff happened he had no support network in the sense that Aristos did that could get them through a sticky patch with Enery.
Wolsey’s support network was the Catholic Church but that was removed by E fancying Anne Boleyn and all the consequences of that.
“We never actually did have that blocking off of the ascension of the heights”: that’s my reading too. But there’s a second order effect, namely the insistence, by Guardianistas and others, that there is such a blocking off leads too many people to not even try to get ahead. “It’s not for the likes of us” – a ready-made excuse is still a bloody excuse.
To them I offer my much-repeated advice: get off your fucking knees!
While reading that Wikipedia excerpt I wondered how Keble could have even known about Harris’s left-wing associations. Did he come bouncing into the interview room with his Red Wedge and Swappie badges all lined up in a row? Had he submitted three long paragraphs about Posadism in his personal statement? It turns out this latter guess was nearer the mark: apparently, he cited his membership of the Young Socialists when filling out his UCCA form. So he might well have queered his own pitch, in other words, and in an unnecessarily gauche (ho ho) fashion as well – I mean, who would be daft enough to broadcast their partisan politics in an Oxbridge application? And yet, despite being full of Tory public schoolboys, Keble still granted him two interviews.
Then there’s manufactured diversity like all the fawning over the first black female Supreme Court justice, who in reality ticked all the boxes for Washington insiders/old boys club
“he cited his membership of the Young Socialists when filling out his UCCA form”: I’ve done admissions at two British universities. I have no memory of reading anything the candidates had to say about themselves. Occasionally I would skim through what their teachers/Head had to say. I can remember only two times that was worthwhile.
However I do remember a co-interviewer at a Cambridge college wanting to reject a candidate when it emerged that the boy’s parents took the Telegraph.
@ Hacket
Please re-read the title of the piece, particularly the word “British” between “the” and “Establishment”
Building tycoon John Bloor is practically royalty to lovers of British motorbikes. Does that count?
claimed his membership of left-wing organisations had not won him many favours with such a traditional and conservative college
Bollocks. He just wasn’t good enough.