It added that the New York Times had published more than 15,000 words of front-page coverage debating the propriety of medical care for trans children in the last eight months alone.
Well, no, it hasn’t. No one is denying medical care for trans children or any other kind or type of children. Getting their shots, checking their weights, all the things that are normally done for children are done for trans children.
But given the current debate about it scheduling 14 year olds to have their tits or dicks cut off. Yes, that’s something worth debating, isn’t it?
No one at all is arguing about “medical care”. It’s about “which” medical care.
They also criticised a reliance on sources opposed to trans issues and a failure to explain their links to hate groups.
But Honies, your definition of a hate group is one opposed to cutting the tits off teenagers.
More than 180 contributors, including Sex and The City actress Cynthia Dixon, writer Lena Dunham and whistleblower Chelsea Manning, have penned a letter raising “serious concerns” about the newspaper’s reporting on transgender, non-binary and gender nonconforming people.
I hope Frank Booth from Blue Velvet signed this letter too.
What do people think they are going to get when they get their dicks cut off?
Is there any case anywhere of a normal heterosexual man settling down with a trans woman? Or are trans women disproportionately, largely, only able to get shagged by incorrigible perverts?
That’s a straight (sic) question.
Bin4R. “What do people think they are going to get when they get their dicks cut off?”
For most of them embarking on this route at a young age, following in the footsteps of nut job Dylan Mulvaney’s “Days of Girlhood”, what they think they’re going to get is a special radiance of importance and the approbation and approval of the “WHOLE WORLD, FOREVER”.
What they actually get is likes on tik tok and instagram and then everyone moves on to the next new thing.
Andy Warhol’s “fifteen minutes of fame” might be a few weeks or months now, but it’s no less ephemeral. It is, however, much, much more harmful and damaging.
Worse though are those conceited woke parents who are pushing their children through this process for exactly the same reason: “look at me! Regardez moi! See how special I am to have special children!” That’s like the worst stage mum cubed.
Trans kids are like vegan cats. It ain’t them making the decisions.
With the difference that the vegan cat can sneak out for a crafty mouse.
Nota Benny that “it was the CHILD’s idea!” is also the textbook defence of kiddy fiddlers and has been since Uncle Ernie was molestering Tommy.
Little children – 9 year olds – who still believe in Santa Claus are being put on a pathway to irreversible sterility and surgical mutilation by Our NHS.
St. Nicholas, pray for us.
Christ, the Lion, have mercy on us.
Must admit Steve that I have a different idea of what lions should do to people who mutilate 9 year olds.
I’m not going to listen to a bunch of alcoholics and cokeheads with daddy issues about matters of mental health.
Bboy – He is not a tame lion.
Pass it on.
Maybe we should just start praying to Aslan directly?
JG – I think there was some controversy along those lines in the 16th century.
Wish I hadn’t sold my rifle.
Having some experience of parents whose kids come out as trans a lot of them aren’t happy but the medical establishment etc is brow beating them into silence, the do you want your child to kill themself argument being common. There are the cheerleader ones basking in the reflected glow (almost always mothers), I heard one woman boast about how she had her kid on puberty blockers within 2 weeks of ‘coming out’
Like all of these obsessions it’s only the small minority of activist parents getting airtime, they aren’t speaking for the majority.
There’s some who are going through break up and this is just another way of weaponising the kids, ex is against it so they are all for it
You are aware the minimum age for transgender surgery (chest as well as genital) in the USA is 18, right?
Same rule applies in the UK.
So, no, it’s not about cutting “titties” off kids.
No.
It’s about drugging them, stunting their natural development and preventing adolescence and then when they are have no other options (18 or otherwise) cutting their dick/titties off.
@Josephine – Are you taking the piss or what?