Men who loudly discuss their sexual conquests in public could face up to seven years in jail under plans to criminalise misogyny in Scotland.
A consultation, published by the SNP Government, proposes creating five new laws designed to outlaw “abusive and humiliating” male behaviour which is claimed stops women “fully participating in society”.
Under a new offence of “misogynistic behaviour”, it would not be necessary for an offender to directly address a woman to be found guilty, under the plans.
Instead, they could watch pornography where others could see it or have “loud, graphic sexual conversations about women in a public place where they can be heard by others”.
Meanwhile, under a new offence of “misogynistic harassment”, an offence would be committed if a man shouts sexually abusive remarks at a woman in the street or uses abusive language “to a girl who does not want to be ‘chatted up’”.
Other examples would include “deliberately rubbing up against a woman in a crowded place” or showing porn to a female.
In addition, a new offence of “stirring up” hatred against women and girls could be deployed against “incel” male supremacist bloggers or Andrew Tate-style online personalities who make inflammatory remarks about the opposite sex.
And what of women who indulge in any of these behaviours?
‘And what of women who indulge in any of these behaviours?’
Obviously males must be very severely punished for it.
“Misogyny” stretched like taffy to include “anything I don’t like”. Good going there….
And of course, the right of women to discuss every thing they don’t like about males in general and their exes specifically loudly and publicly should be enshrined as an Inalienable Human Right.
Ah well… The Scots voted in the Karens. Reap what you sow….
‘And what of women who indulge in any of these behaviours?’
That is different. That is women empowering themselves.
I am starting to wonder if the United Kingdom is really worth the candle. Maybe we should eject Scotland.
It is already clear that there are two criminal systems – women get treated far more leniently than men
“It is already clear that there are two criminal systems – women get treated far more leniently than men”
There was that case recently of the Welsh couple who killed their daughter by neglect during Covid. The mother was the primary care giver, the father was suffering from mental health issues (he had been admitted to mental hospitals with psychosis in the past) yet he got 7 and half years and the mother 6 years. I mean, they both deserve to be locked up and the key thrown away, but why did the mother (who was arguably more responsible for her daughters care) get a lesser sentence?
Men who loudly discuss their sexual conquests in public could face up to seven years in jail under plans to criminalise misogyny in Scotland.
Q1 – how loudly is “loudly”
Q2 – what if they’re gay?
Q3 – does misogyny encompass casusing “trauma” to the alphanumeric?
We used to have our own spaces so we could loudly lie about our conquests, what did they expect? Leopards, spots etc.
I just want to be clear – Misogyny is a bad thing. But trans paedophiles and rapists wanting access to children and women only spaces because they ‘declare themselves women’ – absolutely fine? I’d imagine anyone accused of offences under this legislation, which marks a new low for the SNP (and given their government is worse than North Korea that is saying something) will simply say they’re a man and these imbeciles are hoisted by their own incoherence. Truly there is no excuse for not abolishing Holyrood. What is the use of ‘self-government’ (even in truncated form) for morons?
Have they learned nothing from trying to ban football chants?
No. They have not.
How about tranny activists stirring up hate against J. K. Rowling?
A gentleman doesn’t boast about past amours; but were I to do so, and be apprehended under this law, I would loudly protest at this transphobic bigotry and demand my accusers be prosecuted for hate crimes to the fullest extent of the law.
After all, if I at that moment choose to identify as a lesbian transwoman, that is my absolute right, and thus I may speak fondly and in detail of past lovers, or watch erotica, or proposition fellow women in a sex-positive manner; as befits my freedom as a strong, empowered woman.
If Scotland continues to insist that men can identify as women at will, then nobody accused under this law will be a man on the day of trial: turn up in a frock and point out that today, your name is Samantha and your pronouns are she/her, and anyone claiming different is clearly the bastard offspring of Adolf Hitler and JK Rowling.
This is another example of why legislation needs to be (yet almost never is) Red Teamed properly…
What if you’re singing “I’ve got hoes in different area codes” at the karaoke bar?
Or Rapper’s Delight?
“He can’t satisfy you with his little worm, but I can bust you out with my super sperm. I gon’ do it, I gon’ do it, I gon’ do it, do it, do it. And I’m here, and I’m there, I’m Big Bank Hank and I’m everywhere”
SNP is bound and determined to make Scotland live up to the stereotypes.