Now, this bit is fun:
In addition, she was told to repay £790,634 in costs that Banks paid her after he initially lost the case last year.
Quite possibly the crippling bit but also entirely fair. Banks lost so had to pay her costs – ie, her lawyers bills. Now he’s won and so he doesn’t have to pay her lawyers bills. She has to pay her own lawyers. And, of course, pay back Banks for the money he paid to her lawyers.
Whatever else anyone says about any other aspect of the case that does seem entirely and wholly fair, no? Having won Banks shouldn’t have to foot the bill for her lawyers?