Skip to content

To disagree with La Burchill

It’s generally agreed that sex-selection is a Bad Thing.

Well, yes, it is true that the recorded sex life of La Burchill has been somewhat less sex selective than my own. But really, I do insist on not apologising for selecting the sex of those I invite into closer contact.

Even managed to get it right, every time, too.

6 thoughts on “To disagree with La Burchill”

  1. You persuaded me to try and find out who Julie Burchill was Tim.

    And yes, I’m really not interested.

  2. JB is, of course, writing about the selection of the sex of unborn foetuses (focusing on gay male couples demanding sons).

  3. Every child has value and limitless potential regardless of gender

    I suspect not in the eyes of two gay males who want a son each.

  4. We’ve had thousands of years of widows and widowers, with mixed results.
    we’ve had a generation of divorced parents with usually negative results.
    The fashion for AI surrogates is so new that the results can’t be assessed yet. But I have a suspicion they may not be as positive as hoped.

  5. @ Chris Miller:

    JB is, of course, writing about the selection of the sex of unborn foetuses (focusing on gay male couples demanding sons).

    Doing a big think…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *