SNP could scrap conversion therapy ban to win election, activists fear
How dare anyone let people vote for what they actually want?
SNP could scrap conversion therapy ban to win election, activists fear
How dare anyone let people vote for what they actually want?
Paedophiles hardest hit.
Banning ‘conversion practices’? You mean like banning people trying to ‘convert’ men into women and vice versa? Trying to ‘convert’ insecure teenage lesbians into breastless suicidal drones with patchy bumfluff? Or the sort of ‘conversion therapy’ involving drugs and scalpels which turns confused teenagers into unhappy cockless freaks?
That’s what the ban means, right? Right?
(If banning all the above also means no more praying away the gay, then fair enough.)
MC – If banning all the above also means no more praying away the gay, then fair enough.
Why? Do we think Britain is a better place for being gay? Or was it better in 1988?
The most amusing thing about Scottish ‘democracy’ is that their muslim ‘First Minister’ has just said the Jocks will happily accept refugees from Gaza.
The possibility is delightful – they voted for the cunt so they deserve to get this good and hard.
I particularly can’t wait to hear the reaction of Times columnist and Scottish Jew Hugo Rifkind – though he’ll probably happily throw his fellow Scottish Jews under the liberal bus.
We’re all going down in the unsalvageable SS Great Britain, sadly, but the pain will be lessened by the Jocks getting some of the enrichment they have thus far avoided, which avoidance has hitherto allowed them the luxury of attacking we Little Englanders for our unreconstructed racism.
BRING IT THE FUCK ON 🙂
Nae one’s ganna convert me tae a Pape, specially no’ the SNP ! Ye ken ? Crivens.
Interested – The possibility is delightful – they voted for the cunt so they deserve to get this good and hard.
Hamza got as many votes to lead a government as Rishi Sunak did. I know it’s always tempting to blame the public for being fat and stupid, but the public has nothing to do with how we are ruled in the Enshitened Kingdom.
I particularly can’t wait to hear the reaction of Times columnist and Scottish Jew Hugo Rifkind – though he’ll probably happily throw his fellow Scottish Jews under the liberal bus.
Hugo is one of those “multiculturalism for the gentiles” guys:
The journalist Hugo Rifkind, who is himself Jewish, was also among those to criticise Tuesday’s speech by Braverman.
He tweeted:”Remarkable to hear Braverman say multiculturalism has failed.
“She’s a British Home Secretary descended from Goan Indians from Mauritius and Kenya, married to a Jewish husband, in a government headed by Britain’s first Hindu PM. What would successful multiculturalism look like?”
True successful multiculturalism has never been tried. Especially not in Israel.
Do we think Britain is a better place for being gay? Or was it better in 1988?
Is Britain gay today? Was it straight in 88?
Banning the medical mutilation of people with mental health issues by the tranny industry would be a good thing. If to achieve this, we had to sacrifice the ability of religious groups and shrinks to peddle snake oil ‘treatments’ to blokes who like bumsex but feel guilty about it, I’d be OK with that.
Steve – fair point re the vote.
Let me refine it slightly: the SNP voters deserve what they get.
So do the Tory and Labour voters who voted for parties which are probably wishing they’d made the same pledge.
So is every other Scot who isn’t voting for any party other than the vast uniparty of distraction, of which all of the above are part.
I’d better not say what I think is the correct response to the Scottish and indeed British political situation.
MC – Britain is like a surprisingly morbidly obese AIDS patient who also has monkeypox and bum cancer and a horrid case of piles now.
Totally ruined to the point it’s not worth even trying to fix it if that were even possible short of having nukes in low earth orbit.
Allow me to explain the degree to which our former country is fucked: Winston Churchill’s statue now comes with its own wooden burkha to protect it from our successful multiculturalism. Where do we go from here? Nowhere. This is what the death of your society looks like.
In 1988 Britain was Now That’s What I Call Quite Good.
Interested – me too, but it involves the principle of reciprocity. Good and hard.
Well if we do welcome any refugees from Gaza (unlikely given that the Egyptians know exactly what will happen if they open their border with Gaza), then expect to see coaches full of Gazans departing Glasgow to live with their cousins in London. The weather up here is not conducive to mass immigration from anywhere that knows sunshine.
BiS – there’s plenty of primary schools in Scotland where white children are a minority.
More arriving every day.
Britain is like a surprisingly morbidly obese AIDS patient who also has monkeypox and bum cancer and a horrid case of piles now.
Oh believe me, I get your point. You have made it wearyingly often enough. Everything’s rubbish, everything’s gay and the prime minister is the same colour as pooh (yukky!).
MC – Oh believe me, I get your point. You have made it wearyingly often enough. Everything’s rubbish, everything’s gay and the prime minister is the same colour as pooh (yukky!).
And he’s a midget.
Yeah, it’s not happy talk, but there probably weren’t many chuckles on RMS Titanic either. I’m tired of explaining to retards that bashing your forehead against that wall isn’t going to help you. Enjoy your Rishi.
Hugo is one of those “multiculturalism for the gentiles” guys:
Oh that’s pretty common. Breakfast conversation with a London Jewish family. Early topic: Britain should be a multicultural paradise with no barriers to anyone. Objectors are despicable racists should be condemned ( son Mark was a journalist & Searchlight activist) Later topic: Cousin Terry has managed to get his son into an exclusively Jewish North London after-school club where he can mix with & acquire nice Jewish friends. This to be celebrated. (Oh, breakfast was bacon & eggs by the way. So it’s not as if they were particularly frum.)
A multicultural society is desirable because it presents no bars to us. As long as it doesn’t intrude into our Jewish world, which should remain separate.
It’s nothing particularly unique to Jews. But most other cultures have a more live & let live attitude. There aren’t Greek Cypriots or Chinese telling us how we should live. What used to be unique was the numbers of Jews actively promoting multiculturalism to the majority through literature, media & politics. In all of which they’re massively over-represented. Au Rifkind.
Of course, not so unique now. The Muslims have adopted the same tactic. Only more so.
I left out the Blacks with the capital, didn’t I?
@MC
Banning the medical mutilation of people with mental health issues by the tranny industry would be a good thing. If to achieve this, we had to sacrifice the ability of religious groups and shrinks to peddle snake oil ‘treatments’ to blokes who like bumsex but feel guilty about it, I’d be OK with that.
These things are highly distinct.
Mentally ill people being treated with irreversible surgery is obviously wrong, and should be prohibited by law.
Gays who’d rather not be gay volunteering to be told they’ll go to hell and haven’t they thought about shagging women instead it’s what God would like is entirely their affair and most certainly should not be prohibited by law.
Humza as a muslim is all in favour of conversion of gays . (from alive to dead- as per the quran. hadiths and sura)
BiS – Yeah, it wasn’t a good idea for a race of weedy accountants to aggressively promote the mass importation of Muslims to their host societies.
Hugo Rifkind looks like he’ll immediately go foetal and melt down into a puddle of gay fluids if he’s ever punched in the face by a proper man.
“Do we think Britain is a better place for being gay?”
It’s a better place for the reforms of the sixties, allowing gays freedoms the rest of us enjoy and, in particular, giving them a substantial defence from blackmail and bullying.
It’s a worse place because of the subsequent rise of the politicised, radicalised gays. But then it’s a worse place because of the rise of the politicised, radicalised anybodies.
Off topic: the blogger and commenters have often argued about banking. I have enjoyed Tim vs Jim, for instance. I’ve just come across this which I think they might both like.
https://www.interfluidity.com/v2/2669.html
If the SNP wants to import Humza’s extended family and two million murderous rocket scientists conversion therapy won’t be banned, it’ll be compulsory.
Scotland will then turn into Lebanon and we’ll have to rebuild Hadrian’s wall, complete with razor wire and minefields.
Great Britain is just about ok if you’re a secular Muslim, one who thinks the Koran isn’t the literal and perfect word of God and a total solution to how we live our lives, and perhaps it was written by a regular bloke with a bit of charisma and the Hadith was written by a committee and God wasn’t looking in.
If you’re a secular Muslim in a Muslim country, you are very brave indeed and that’s if you’re alive.
Morocco a possible exception, they seem to host lots of friendlies at the footie, good hosts are the Moroccans not counting the ones trying to get into Spain.
O/T, but sorta, kinda related;
https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/scotlands-kilt-bonds-how-might-debt-plan-work-2023-10-18/
Fascinating, Captain.
@bongo – personally i think Morrocco is a shithole . It seems “One Out of Two People Is Mentally Ill: Gruesome Reality of Mental Health Care in Morocco” source -https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2017/07/224718/mentally-ill-mental-health-care-morocco
In my opinion the other 50% are cnuts. I know some people on here disagree, but I’m sticking to my opinion.
@moqifen
I concur. Having spent a lot of time in hot and sandy places of that variety I can say without fear or favour that they are all shitholes.
There are interesting parts, many of the people are genuinely lovely, I like the food, and the weather isn’t too bad if you don’t mind the heat.
The problem is the religion. Or, more accurately, the religious enforcers and their determination to make everyone else to submit.
If you cut 50% of the population out of everything, and practise consanguineous marriage, you’re already damaging your collective brainpower.
If you then ban all sorts of stuff for illogical reasons, and put vast amounts of effort into policing these bans, the trade offs and lost opportunities are obvious.
I have trouble explaining this to anyone who hasn’t lived or worked (or fought) in the Middle East.
You moan about this stuff and they say you’re islamophobic and point out that they know lots of lovely muslims.
You point out that Ahmed in accounts and Mohammed in the local curry house may well be very nice blokes, though they also may not; either way, the only thing keeping the mass of their correligionists in check here is that they are not yet the majority.
Once they are in the majority they are duty-bound – or the fanatics are – to introduce and to enforce precisely the same rules they live by in other islamic countries.
OK, there are degrees – you might still be able to get a pint, and you might still be able to wear reasonable revealing clothes in some areas.
But I wouldn’t bet on it being that relaxed, and I wouldn’t bet on Ahmed or Mohammed fighting it because either they’ll be all for it or they’ll be too scared of the nutters who are.
Thus the only question – as far as I can see – is: Will they ever get to be the majority?
And the only answer, unless something happens veru quickly to change the direction of travel, is: Yes.
Interested – yarp.
Our politics are trivial (vaping bans, “bullying” of senior civil servants on £100k, fantasies about Rwanda etc.) and feel like busywork to distract you from the existential (seeing the society you grew up in curl up and die in real time).
My fondest wish is for a Hung Parliament.
But if we can’t get that, I’ll take a Lionised Parliament.