Skip to content

Well, yes….

The lawsuit alleges that Mr McMahon dangled “career-making and life-changing” promises in front of Ms Grant after the pair were introduced in 2019.

According to the lawsuit, Mr McMahon lived in the same building as Ms Grant and in 2019 offered to get her a job at WWE after her parents died.

‘Sex was requirement of the job’
She alleges that he eventually made it clear that one of the requirements of the job was a physical relationship with him and later with Mr Laurinaitis and others.

Over the next few years, Mr McMahon lavished her with gifts, including an expensive car, the lawsuit says.

The lawsuit alleges that Mr McMahon and Mr Laurinaitis “controlled her continued employment with WWE, and pressured her to engage in sex acts”.

Umm.

In entirely unrelated news a bit of advice. Of course, to spend corporate money on a horizontal worker is to misuse corporate fiunds. But it’s also probably wise to make sure that the horizontal worker is in fact a professional at being a horizontal worker. Hire from the ranks of horizontal workers that is…..

10 thoughts on “Well, yes….”

  1. Reminds me of the old joke.

    Bloke (looking warily at seagulls in the sky) to his mate: ‘What would you do if a bird shat on your head?’

    Mate: ‘Well I wouldn’t go out with her again for a start.’

  2. «She is an incredibly private and courageous person who has suffered deeply at the hands of Mr McMahon and Mr Laurinaitis.»

    Oh!

  3. Bloke in North Dorset

    Of the other joke:

    Bloke: Would you go to bed with me for £1m?

    Bird: Yes.

    Bloke: Would you go to bed with me for £1?

    Bird: Of course not, what do you think I am?

    Bloke: We’ve established what you are, we’re just haggling the price.

  4. Now Ms Grant I want you to think very carefully before you answer this.

    Are you absolutely certain this didn’t actually take place approximately 30 years ago in the ladies changing room of a busy New York department store and the person who assaulted you was really President Trump (imitates sound of cash register)?

  5. If Trump hasn’t faced criminal case for sexual assault on that woman then isn’t he just protesting his innocence (in a very direct and crude way) as innocent until proven guilty after all.
    Could he counter claim she is defaming him by accusing him of rape, especially as the details revealed seem to be he tried it on and was rebuffed so sexual assault or attempted rape possibly not rape.
    Like a lot of the other cases looks like a vindictive political motivated stitch up, also a waste of time as everyone knows his history and attitude to women so it’s already baked in to the voting intentions

  6. Like a lot of the other cases looks like a vindictive political motivated stitch up, also a waste of time as everyone knows his history and attitude to women so it’s already baked in to the voting intentions
    Would have thought rather the opposite of intended rather than waste of time. Anyone who is convinced of the “vindictive political motivated stitch up” may well start questioning what they’ve been told about Trump’s attitude to women. That could play further with women voters than the stitch up.

  7. Women finds out she was a hooker in I wondered why they kept paying me for sex shock.
    Same as that girl that blew Andy off.
    If you are shagging for reward you ARE a sex worker.
    Might be flash stuff, pretty clothes, nice holidays etc rather than the money for them.
    Potato / potato.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *