Skip to content

Right On!

The Duchess of Sussex has criticised women who are “completely spewing hate” to other women online, calling on female executives in tech to do more to block it, as Prince Harry cheered her on.

The Duchess, speaking at an event about women in the media in Austin, Texas, said she could not “wrap her head” around how people could have been “so hateful” towards her on social media.

“It’s not catty, it’s cruel,” she said of comments written online while she was pregnant. “Why would you do that?”

“What I find the most disturbing frankly, especially as a supporter of women, is how much of the hate is women completely spewing that to other women,” she said. “I cannot make sense of that.”

She specifically criticised female executives at online platforms who host conspiracy theories, disturbing rhetoric and “very inciting comments”.

“There are a lot of women at the highest executive level who are great champions of women and great philanthropists, and they are working in these spaces, and yet they’re allowing this kind of behaviour to run rampant.

“And at a certain point, they have got to put the do’s behind the say’s and really make some changes on a systemic level.”

Change The World to stop wimmins being catty to me!

To which the correct response is “Fuck Off, Honey.” Or even “Fuck Off Honey.”

13 thoughts on “Right On!”

  1. I’m not sure, Tim. Let’s take a hypothetical example. Suppose some arbitrary woman were to make accusations of racial unconscious bias against her family by marriage which then gets widely reported in the media as “racism”. And then just suppose, hypothetically, that her sister-in-law’s name should be leaked as one of the people at centre of what journalists subsequently call the “racism row” as a direct consequence of the publication of a foreign-language version of the first woman’s husband’s book. Then would that first woman be being cruel, not catty, to the second woman in a way that Megan just can’t make sense of? I’m just not sure.

  2. Women are women & you ain’t going to change that. No doubt she’s just as catty & cruel as the rest of them.

  3. What I find the most disturbing … is how much of the hate is women completely spewing that to other women
    (voice=JurassicPark)You’ve not met a lot of women, have you?(/voice)

  4. Isn’t it about time the telegraph devoted an entire section to this shallow, self-righteous, duplicitous, unlikeable, ungrateful, greedy and well
    past her prime mixed/race female.

    Oh wait.

  5. After decades of men being told what they can & can’t say by women, it’s nice to see women getting a taste of their own medicine. More of this please.

  6. Ms Markle doesn’t do hate.
    Vile, profitable loathing, yes. Hate, no. Absolutely not.

    Pretty sure she hates those calling her a “Race baiting grifter on the make”, albeit fairly accurate.

    Not my fault she feels entitled to a Disney princess lifestyle and feels cheated out of that because the reality of being a modern British Royal is more about charity work and “smiling for a photograph with the plebs” than lounging around on luxury yachts whilst some minion peels her a grape.

    The problem is that she’s a trailer trash divorcée D-list celebrity that got a lucky break when she snagged a Royal Duke into her bed with her well practiced art of cunnilingus and the stupid fool decided to make an honest woman of her.

    No different from the chorus girls of earlier centuries, but certainly nothing remarkable, but you can’t make a whore into a housewife and you certainly can’t make a trailer trash American divorcée D-list celebrity into a princess.

    As for all the “Muh racism”, if you hadn’t told me she had some African in her, I’d have just guessed she was well tanned. This whole aspect of “They wanted to know what colour the baby would be” is just such overdone bullshit.

    Nobody cared until she played the race card for money and nothing else. All of this is just a grift for her and at some point Harry will outlive his usefullness and the bitch will divorce him.

    That’s the universal price of being a simp to a slattern.

  7. when she snagged a Royal Duke into her bed with her well practiced art of cunnilingus

    Not to be a pendant, but wouldn’t she have snagged a Duke with well-practiced fellatio?

    Otherwise good points, especially about the “well-tanned” – I had the same thought, that she was just Hollywood tan.

  8. when she snagged a Royal Duke into her bed with her well practiced art of cunnilingus. Not to be a pendant, but wouldn’t she have snagged a Duke with well-practiced fellatio?

    The art of pendantry is well practiced here at Timmy’s Place. You may well be right, I don’t know the full variety of terminology involving mouths and sexual organs. All seems very Latin to my sensibilities.

    Cock sucking for sure though, covers the descriptive for want of a better term.

  9. Welll… JG…. Given that your *former* Royal has proven record of being both a cvnt and a pussy…

    Cunnilingus may actually apply here….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *