(Several thousand words polishing the turd that is Kamala Harris )
I’m old enough to remember when The Telegraph was different from The Guardian.
dearieme
Kahlúa Harris and Hasbeen Hellbitch do share a weakness. Hic!
Simon Neale
Does that mean that she won’t marry a serial philanderer, or that she won’t start murdering her political opponents?
Steve
So women voters are more likely to embrace Harris simply because she brings so much less baggage to the race.
She’s been Vice President for four years and won zero delegates when she stood for election in Democratic primaries.
Journalists —–> Saudi Embassy
Matt
@Simon Neale
Serial philanderers are fine provided they’re leftists.
Murdering political opponents is fine provided you’re a leftist.
No, the mistake Hillary made is she thought she could win on her own merits, so didn’t put much effort into the Fortification.
Chernyy Drakon
Does that mean that she won’t marry a serial philanderer, or that she won’t start murdering her political opponents?
I’m not a politician, but surely having your political opponents suicide themselves with two gunshots to the head from across the room is a winning strategy?
Grist
Have these people heard her talk? How do the Yanks choose their Presidents? Do the Yanks choose their Presidents?
Dennis, An Obvious Racist
That article is pure, refined, unadulterated bullshit.
Yes, she’s picking up more of the women’s vote, but she’s hemorrhaging votes in the Black and Latino communities.
She hasn’t been playing up her record as a prosecutor at all, largely because it is the precise reason she’s losing Black support.
Her first big policy drop last week, which included price controls, was so bad that even Democrats panned it.
Getting puffed up by the press for a month will get you better polling numbers (especially if the polls are deliberately skewed), but it will not last. Inflation is real, crime is real, the border crisis is real.
If Harris doesn’t come out with something meaningful on these issues, she’s going to be toast.
Mohave Greenie
Hillary lost because she reminded people of their ex’s mother. Kamala reminds them of their sibling’s weird lefty spouse (gender not assumed).
Dennis, Your Guide To The USA
Get on YouTube and look at the debate between Harris and Tulsi Gabbard.
It was the moment her presidential campaign ended.
Tulsi Gabbard is on Trump’s debate prep team.
john77
Hillary’s big mistake was *being believed to have* orchestrated the murder of inconvenient people.
A competent evil overlord never gets suspected of his/her crimes except by a relatively tiny minority
Lab Rat
Do the Yanks choose their Presidents?
We used to. After 2020 they come pre-installed, with stealth updates.
Van_Patten
Dennis
You’re a beacon of great sense
From your perspective can they get her close enough Trump to carry out the same playbook (Dominion voting machines, Pallets of ballots bought in from MS13 controlled territory, Random drops of dead voters ballots) that worked so well in 2020? They clearly have the judiciary angle sewn up so they only need carry out similar level of fraud (which I think its now accepted was off the scale compared to any country anywhere on Earth in the last elections and the mid terms) to prevail, surely?
Person in Pictland
The Z man gives it both barrels:
“the current president is a vegetable and his handpicked replacement is day-drinking prostitute.”
Chris Miller
She*’s repeated one of Hillary’s big mistakes, but substituted “can’t read, can’t think” to describe Trump supporters rather than “deplorables”.
* actually it was Big Joe, but nobody thinks he writes his own scripts
Drive-by lefty
Do you guys really believe this rubbish about the 2020 election, despite the fact that not a shred of meaningful evidence was ever produced for it in court? Even you must know that R presidents get to appoint judges – the Ds emphatically do not own the courts.
The obvious fact, which is accepted by anyone with a brain who cares, is that Trump made it up because he can’t stand losing. His fanboys were happy to elaborate on the lie for the benefit of the base, but backed off on lying in court. The whole thing went nowhere because there was nothing in it.
BniC
It is amusing watching the media tie themselves up in knots trying to justify why she is not doing any media appearances and interviews
The debate could be key just as it was with Biden, Trump needs to keep his calm though.
Trump had a few of Bill’s indiscretions in the audience at the Clinton debates which was an interesting tactic, wonder if he can do something similar with Harris
john77
@ Drive-by Lefty
Some of us take it for granted that Trump made it up because he cannot stand *admitting* that he lost.
Also we don’t believe that the Ds own *all* the courts – but we never said that the Ds own *all* the courts when we said that prosecuting Trump for *allegedly* inflating the value of his property when applying for a loan from a bank that should have been able to check it (and presumably did) was a blatant piece of political vendetta.
What I said was that there are lots of things for which one can genuinely attack Trump so *why on earth* did the New York Ds bother to make one up?
Steve
Do you guys really believe this rubbish about the 2020 election, despite the fact that not a shred of meaningful evidence was ever produced for it in court?
The courts refused to hear any evidence, so what are you talking about?
You’d have to be severely retarded to think that election was legitimate, since we saw the fraud live on tv.
Remember when the Governor of Georgia allowed forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines, then shortly thereafter, his daughter’s boyfriend died in a mysterious car explosion, and then the governor changed his mind and cancelled the audit?
Boganboy
Since Hillary insisted that her lost election was a Russian plot, it wasn’t unreasonable that Trump decided to use a similar argument to explain his defeat.
Van_Patten
Drive by Lefty
So the fact that Antifa mobs basically threatened judges into not even allowing cases to be brought for you is just ‘BAU’ – or did you forget the Summer’s rioting that accompanied the BLM Demos.
In terms of ‘Red’ Flags there were so many that it’s hard to know where to begin. Of course Democrat control of the Legacy media is overwhelming and if you are questioning of Democrat control of the judiciary at least in certain states, why do you think so many frivolous prosecutions have been launched against Trump. You can also witness the treatment given to the J6 protestors vs BLM rioters?
in short the evidence seems to be compelling yet wasn’t even granted a hearing – am assuming you also believe there was ‘Russian collusion’ in 2016?
Drive-by lefty
Remember when…
I remember that one of Trump’s attack dogs made that story up. The truth, easy to verify, is that the unfortunate victim’s car was hit from behind by a truck, and the truck driver was charged with homicide.
I remember that a full manual audit of the Georgia count was conducted, which confirmed that the machine count was accurate.
(Several thousand words polishing the turd that is Kamala Harris )
I’m old enough to remember when The Telegraph was different from The Guardian.
Kahlúa Harris and Hasbeen Hellbitch do share a weakness. Hic!
Does that mean that she won’t marry a serial philanderer, or that she won’t start murdering her political opponents?
So women voters are more likely to embrace Harris simply because she brings so much less baggage to the race.
She’s been Vice President for four years and won zero delegates when she stood for election in Democratic primaries.
Journalists —–> Saudi Embassy
@Simon Neale
Serial philanderers are fine provided they’re leftists.
Murdering political opponents is fine provided you’re a leftist.
No, the mistake Hillary made is she thought she could win on her own merits, so didn’t put much effort into the Fortification.
Does that mean that she won’t marry a serial philanderer, or that she won’t start murdering her political opponents?
I’m not a politician, but surely having your political opponents suicide themselves with two gunshots to the head from across the room is a winning strategy?
Have these people heard her talk? How do the Yanks choose their Presidents? Do the Yanks choose their Presidents?
That article is pure, refined, unadulterated bullshit.
Yes, she’s picking up more of the women’s vote, but she’s hemorrhaging votes in the Black and Latino communities.
She hasn’t been playing up her record as a prosecutor at all, largely because it is the precise reason she’s losing Black support.
Her first big policy drop last week, which included price controls, was so bad that even Democrats panned it.
Getting puffed up by the press for a month will get you better polling numbers (especially if the polls are deliberately skewed), but it will not last. Inflation is real, crime is real, the border crisis is real.
If Harris doesn’t come out with something meaningful on these issues, she’s going to be toast.
Hillary lost because she reminded people of their ex’s mother. Kamala reminds them of their sibling’s weird lefty spouse (gender not assumed).
Get on YouTube and look at the debate between Harris and Tulsi Gabbard.
It was the moment her presidential campaign ended.
Tulsi Gabbard is on Trump’s debate prep team.
Hillary’s big mistake was *being believed to have* orchestrated the murder of inconvenient people.
A competent evil overlord never gets suspected of his/her crimes except by a relatively tiny minority
Do the Yanks choose their Presidents?
We used to. After 2020 they come pre-installed, with stealth updates.
Dennis
You’re a beacon of great sense
From your perspective can they get her close enough Trump to carry out the same playbook (Dominion voting machines, Pallets of ballots bought in from MS13 controlled territory, Random drops of dead voters ballots) that worked so well in 2020? They clearly have the judiciary angle sewn up so they only need carry out similar level of fraud (which I think its now accepted was off the scale compared to any country anywhere on Earth in the last elections and the mid terms) to prevail, surely?
The Z man gives it both barrels:
“the current president is a vegetable and his handpicked replacement is day-drinking prostitute.”
She*’s repeated one of Hillary’s big mistakes, but substituted “can’t read, can’t think” to describe Trump supporters rather than “deplorables”.
* actually it was Big Joe, but nobody thinks he writes his own scripts
Do you guys really believe this rubbish about the 2020 election, despite the fact that not a shred of meaningful evidence was ever produced for it in court? Even you must know that R presidents get to appoint judges – the Ds emphatically do not own the courts.
The obvious fact, which is accepted by anyone with a brain who cares, is that Trump made it up because he can’t stand losing. His fanboys were happy to elaborate on the lie for the benefit of the base, but backed off on lying in court. The whole thing went nowhere because there was nothing in it.
It is amusing watching the media tie themselves up in knots trying to justify why she is not doing any media appearances and interviews
The debate could be key just as it was with Biden, Trump needs to keep his calm though.
Trump had a few of Bill’s indiscretions in the audience at the Clinton debates which was an interesting tactic, wonder if he can do something similar with Harris
@ Drive-by Lefty
Some of us take it for granted that Trump made it up because he cannot stand *admitting* that he lost.
Also we don’t believe that the Ds own *all* the courts – but we never said that the Ds own *all* the courts when we said that prosecuting Trump for *allegedly* inflating the value of his property when applying for a loan from a bank that should have been able to check it (and presumably did) was a blatant piece of political vendetta.
What I said was that there are lots of things for which one can genuinely attack Trump so *why on earth* did the New York Ds bother to make one up?
Do you guys really believe this rubbish about the 2020 election, despite the fact that not a shred of meaningful evidence was ever produced for it in court?
The courts refused to hear any evidence, so what are you talking about?
You’d have to be severely retarded to think that election was legitimate, since we saw the fraud live on tv.
Remember when the Governor of Georgia allowed forensic examination of the Dominion voting machines, then shortly thereafter, his daughter’s boyfriend died in a mysterious car explosion, and then the governor changed his mind and cancelled the audit?
Since Hillary insisted that her lost election was a Russian plot, it wasn’t unreasonable that Trump decided to use a similar argument to explain his defeat.
Drive by Lefty
So the fact that Antifa mobs basically threatened judges into not even allowing cases to be brought for you is just ‘BAU’ – or did you forget the Summer’s rioting that accompanied the BLM Demos.
In terms of ‘Red’ Flags there were so many that it’s hard to know where to begin. Of course Democrat control of the Legacy media is overwhelming and if you are questioning of Democrat control of the judiciary at least in certain states, why do you think so many frivolous prosecutions have been launched against Trump. You can also witness the treatment given to the J6 protestors vs BLM rioters?
in short the evidence seems to be compelling yet wasn’t even granted a hearing – am assuming you also believe there was ‘Russian collusion’ in 2016?
Remember when…
I remember that one of Trump’s attack dogs made that story up. The truth, easy to verify, is that the unfortunate victim’s car was hit from behind by a truck, and the truck driver was charged with homicide.
I remember that a full manual audit of the Georgia count was conducted, which confirmed that the machine count was accurate.