Skip to content

My word

Royal visits to Middle East coincide with Prince Andrew’s windfall
Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie have become unofficial ambassadors for the UK as calls grow for their father to reveal the source of his funds for Royal Lodge

Gosh.

16 thoughts on “My word”

  1. Princess Beatrice, right, spoke about the role of AI in transforming society at the Adipec conference, in Abu Dhabi

    Can I have the North Korean firing squad instead?

  2. WTF’s an “unofficial ambassador” ? Does it come with the tricorn hat, frock coat & the authority to command marines?

  3. BiS – I have seen Beatrice and Eugene, and apparently “unofficial ambassador” means “not even with yours”.

    What an ugly, stupid family.

  4. AS – they look like they can’t close their mouths properly due to inbreeding. All horse teeth and vacant stares. They probably smell like cabbage.

    At least Beatrice was wasting breath talking shit about AI, instead of threatening her future subjects that they will own nothing and be happy. Maybe the Bolsheviks weren’t all bad.

  5. Princess Beatrice, right, spoke about the role of AI in transforming society

    Seriously? What the fuck does she know about AI? Or anything else for that matter.

    There is definitely no question of their parentage! Beatrice in particular looks like she was the result of Andy and Fergie being thrown into the same device which created The Fly.

  6. Marius – Well, King Charles doesn’t know how to squeeze his own toothpaste, but that doesn’t stop the guy – who has never done a day’s work in his life – pontificating about how the economy should work.

    The Royal Family are the shittest celebrities. Chocolate dildos, the lot of them.

  7. I prefer a royal family over a republic and president any day. Aristotle, c.2500 years ago, surveyed 100+ constitutions and concluded that constitutional monarchy was the best. Nothing’s changed…

  8. I’ve just checked a picture of Sarah, Beatrice and Eugenie, and yes, good god, they look like dodgy clones of each other.

  9. Yes indeed. Since the alternative to King Charles is probably some dodgy ex-flatmate of Tony Blair’s, I’ll stick with Charlie, thanks.

  10. >I prefer a royal family over a republic and president any day. Aristotle, c.2500 years ago, surveyed 100+ constitutions and concluded that constitutional monarchy was the best. Nothing’s changed…

    The UK no longer has a ‘constitutional monarchy’ in anything more than name. The late Queen made sure of that.

    You are a republic, governed by a prime minister and the monarch has no actual power to reign in ‘their’ government and if they tried would find themselves sleeping on bus stop benches PDQ.

  11. Ag – The UK no longer has a ‘constitutional monarchy’ in anything more than name.

    Indeed. They’re just crap slebs now. Hello magazine is just Heat magazine for a slightly posher readership.

    Charles is too stupid to even understand that being best pals with the enemies of your people is a legacy-shortener. Also I don’t think Prince Gingerpubes’ aggressively thick wokeness came from his tart wife. It’s what every braying rich twat believes in these days.

    The royal family has coasted for a long time on the innate small c conservatism of the British people, but like the Beeb or the RNLI, it’s just another captured woke joke institution that demands respect on the basis that it used to be respectable.

    No King but Christ.

  12. I voted no for a republic when this was proposed many years ago.

    Part of this was sentiment. Liz had been Queen for most of my life.

    But part was that she did nothing. I really don’t like to think of what the pollies would do with Charlies’ power if they could actually exercise it.

    The only use I’d seen of the royal power was when the Governor General dismissed Whitlam when he and Fraser were playing chicken with the budget. Fraser called an election as he agreed to, and Whitlam was booted out.

    Of course I voted for Fraser. But I thought more highly of him then, before he let himself be pushed into allowing Muslim as well as Christian refugees from the Lebanese Civil War to swarm into Oz.

  13. Nearly 50 years on since “The Dismissal” and we still don’t really know whether it was HMQ that gave the nod, some intervening official at Buck House or Sir John Kerr.

    Regardless, it taught the Brits to not interfere in Aussie affairs.

    How fucking neo-colonial is that?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *