UK charity declares ‘refugee homelessness emergency’ as numbers hit record high
Naccom report says gaps in state support have led to more than 1,940 refugees having no accommodation
It’ll, let us say, vary along rather a wide spectrum?
Personally, my observation would be that out of what, 100k? 2% failure rate is pretty good for government work.
If the illegals don’t like it here they can always fuck off back to france.
Excellent, because the solution is very simple. Deport them back where they came from as they aren’t our problem.
Solved.
One could almost admire the chutzpah: demand open borders and then bleat for more money to deal with the consequences of open borders.
Mr Galt, I have to admire your good nature. Being an evil , stingy git I’d rather use the “Sir” Tony Robinson approach he praised the Native American used against the white settlers…
Bloody foreigners – coming over here – taking our doorways!
This is down to incompetence by the Home Office. The site that it bought in a hurry and at an excessive price to house 1,200 (more than the increase in the number of homeless) asylum seekers has been shown to be not fit for purpose (asbestos worries among others) and is empty.
There is a second problem with the incompetence of the DWP erratically failing to pay support to refugees whom the Home Office has forbidden to work for a living so they are unable to pay for their lodgings and get turfed out, or turned down when they apply, by landlords (there are a few charities that specialise with helping these victims of bureaucracy)
Shocking example of colonialism.
All the money wasted on feeding these wicked colonists should be used to send them back to where they came from.
Approx 50% of rough sleepers are illegal migrants. Have been for the last few years. Sending them home would halve the rough sleeper population overnight.
If the government can legislate to declare Rwanda a safe country it can do the same for Albania, Bangladesh, Vietnam, France, Turkey, even Belgium.
That’s where most of these “refugees” come from. So they automatically fail their asylum application and we solve the legal logjam.
But we are being held to ransom by interested parties pretending to be charitable with other people’s money.
We shouldn’t have to encounter gypsy beggars (all of whom work for criminal gangs and travelled thousands of miles to consume British taxpayer resources) when shopping at Sainsbury’s.
But what about the idiots who fall for the sad little face and “HELLO!”, and give them money? You might as well throw food waste into your own front garden.
People who give money to gypsy beggars are funding child abuse:
A three-year-old was badly bruised and had suffered facial injuries. Other children had burns on their bodies. A girl, aged just 12, was found to be pregnant.
The 28 children rescued during Metropolitan Police raids in Ilford, east London, presented a truly pitiable sight.
But the youngsters, believed to have been forced into a Romanian-based Roma gang of beggars and pickpockets, can generate £100,000 annually from their activities, according to the police.
And virtually all of the proceeds make their way back to southern Romania – to towns where huge houses have sprung up and prestige cars line the streets.
The BBC, 2010
@ Steve
The gypsy beggars in the UK are one of the less wonderful consequences of the expansion of the EU into South-Eastern Europe where they are ubiquitous – I found a sharp “Nyet”, implying that I was Russian, helped to reduce the pestering, but I fear it wouldn’t help in the UK.
@ Swannypol
Dumping them back in Calais would be the most effective solution: if Starmer and Macron get on that well, perhaps it might happen one day – and then France would see a much smaller influx of economic mogrants heading for Calais