In one account, he allegedly had sex with a 21-year-old in a hotel room who had contacted him for help with her university fees, giving her a $750 cheque for “tuition reimbursement”.
The woman told the committee that their encounter “could potentially be a form of coercion because I really needed the money”.
That could be you being a whore – even if only part time – but it’s not coercion.
After the New Year, I too am going to be providing services in exchange for renumeration. I need the money, is this also coercion?
And yea glods, the grammar! “a hotel room who had contacted him” eeeee!!!1
“a hotel room that contacted him”
As any fule kno
As usual…. Use the same fine-toothed comb on the entire US political body, using the same shyster logic, and it will be shown that what’s depicted as Deplorable here is actually Monday before Lunch Break.
Aren’t we empowering independent ‘sex workers’ any more, now back to calling the whores is it?
The Congressional Office of Compliance has paid out $17.2m in 264 settlements between 1997 and 2017 many of which were for sexual harassment by members.
Gaetz should now ensure disclosure of the names of the perverts involved, after all if it was fair for him to be named and shamed so should all the others. I bet most of the cases were a damned right more serious that a quick shag with a bimbo who was three years over the age of consent. Incidentally as $750 is only a drop in the ocean where university fees are concerned how did she fund the balance?
Finally releasing the flight manifests for the Lolita Express would be rather fun as well. After all the **** the establishment has thrown at DJT in recent years it would be richly deserved. I suspect that’s the real reason the establishment moved so quickly to prevent him from serving as Trumps AG.
…she said she had received $400 from Mr Gaetz that evening, “which she understood to be payment for sex”
Poor coaching there by the sound of it.
There the usual accusation of the underage girl.
Looking at the website where our local working girls advertise their talents, one notes the considerable number of them claiming to be 19. I know for a fact one of them is 33. I’ve seen her Colombian passport.
That whores lie is a given. Whatever it takes to get the trick.
As a Congressman, Gaetz earned $174,000 (£138,843) a year.
His net worth is greater: On his most recent federal financial disclosure, external filed in August, he reported owning assets worth at least $575,000. His father Don Gaetz, who co-founded hospice provider Vitas Healthcare, has a fortune of about $35m, Forbes reported.
The po-faced hypocrisy of bbc news.
Luckily no other politicians, particularly democrats, become considerably wealthier than their salaries and disclosed earnings would suggest possible.
Shocked?
I thought this plot line wasn’t just one of Rocco’s long series of hard-hitting, in-depth investigational straight-to-video documentaries but an entire franchise.
She should return the money, he was coerced, he really needed to get laid.
“As a Congressman, Gaetz earned $174,000 (£138,843) a year. His net worth is greater: On his most recent federal financial disclosure, external filed in August, he reported owning assets worth at least $575,000.”
What a bizarre comparison of stock and flow. If anything my first thought there was “575k is not a whole lot of assets for someone on 174k a year.” If someone is on £50k a year are we meant to reel in horror that they own a home worth £150k? Pretty sure most people would think that’s a surprisingly cheap house for someone on an above average salary.
Anon.
The same level of financial acumen as Owen Jones when he memorably stated on tv that all millionaires would gain c£50k annually from a reduction in the top rate of income tax. In his kindergarten world millionaire means earning £1m each year. In the BBC’s net assets of $575k are apparently suspicious.
There were a number of stories about young women offering services to sugar daddies in order to pay their tuition fees a few years ago. It even had its own name but it escapes my aged and alcohol addled brain.
” In the BBC’s net assets of $575k are apparently suspicious.”
Unless you work for the BBC of course, as I doubt many of the big cheeses there are making do with £450k houses. And of course thats far less than the annual post tax salary of one G Lineker Esq……
Sex with a woman is – to some extent – transactional. For opening her legs, allowing you inside her and giving you a BJ, she expects, if only subconsciously, something in return – it might be flowers, displays of affection, behavioural changes, money, etc. And if you don’t deliver as you are at least supposed to intuit, then favours will be withdrawn and/or your sex with her will be reinterpreted.
Yeas Theo. But for the modern whore the client is expected to be the gift that goes on giving.
The transaction of sex is: in return for me having sex with you, you have sex with me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hart_family_murders
It’s not just the sick blokes though. Anyway may they all rot in hell or, in the more recent case, in an extremely drawn-out living hell.
Merry Christmas to everyone on here and a small thank you will be sent to our host if I can get the damned link to work.
Replying on the wrong thread again!
I’ve been told in the past that the payment to a hooker isn’t for the sex, it’s for her to go away afterwards…