Doesn’t matter. She’s about the biggest actress in Hollywood right now and the sort of people who go and see a film like Anyone But You don’t care.
She’s about the perfect romcom actress. She’s a decent actress, pretty, but not too pretty, so she acts as an audience surrogate, and has big knockers which means that a bloke won’t mind going along and seeing it.
dearieme
10 months ago
It’s just a matter of taste but, in still photos, I don’t think she’s pretty at all. Rather plain in fact.
Addolff
10 months ago
White, not commie bint, does jeans ad. The leftists go mental.
Black, demonrat bint, does jeans ad (with culturally appropriated blonde hair). The lefitists celebrate:
This and other advertising spots featuring the same pun were received in some corners of the internet as a “eugenicist dog-whistle” implying the genes of a blonde, white woman were superior to others’.
No, no… I’m sure the genes of this mentally retarded Somali bulbhead with flies on his face are equally as good.
Dave Ward
10 months ago
“I don’t think she’s pretty at all. Rather plain in fact”
Spot on. I’ve seen far better looking girls operating supermarket checkouts for a fraction of the money that Sidney is making…
Gamecock
10 months ago
“Rather plain in fact.”
True. But she’s got style. A plain woman with style works quite well.
That’s why they use her to sell clothes.
FrankH
10 months ago
Ah! She’s a Republican. That explains the furore. If she’d been a feminist Democrat with they/them pronouns nobody would have an issue with her – I mean them.
Gamecock
10 months ago
‘star of controversial jeans ad’
Is it the jeans that are controversial, or the ad?
Neither. Commies call things they don’t like ‘controversial.’ The rest of the world wonders what the H are they talking about.
The Streisand Effect is in full force.
Mr Womby
10 months ago
Dave W
There’s a young woman who works in our local Waitrose who would have a good chance at winning a contest to find the next Miss Brazil.
Recusant
10 months ago
Her “plain” adjacent looks are the whole reason for her sex-appeal.
No normal fella, even drunk, imagines he’d have a chance with Gisele Bundchen or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley. But La Sweeney? Sure. Why not?
TD
10 months ago
Imagine the furor if she advertises some white clothing.
Sam Duncan
10 months ago
“Sleb Not a Lefty” has been news for as long as I can remember.
rhoda klapp
10 months ago
“But La Sweeney? Sure. Why not?”
Well, I would.
But I suspect she wouldn’t.
Norman
10 months ago
Rather good Speccie article on why white females (or females with pale complexions) have been valued in most cultures forever:
Doesn’t matter. She’s about the biggest actress in Hollywood right now and the sort of people who go and see a film like Anyone But You don’t care.
She’s about the perfect romcom actress. She’s a decent actress, pretty, but not too pretty, so she acts as an audience surrogate, and has big knockers which means that a bloke won’t mind going along and seeing it.
It’s just a matter of taste but, in still photos, I don’t think she’s pretty at all. Rather plain in fact.
White, not commie bint, does jeans ad. The leftists go mental.
Black, demonrat bint, does jeans ad (with culturally appropriated blonde hair). The lefitists celebrate:
https://www.boredpanda.com/double-standards-beyonce-sydney-sweeney-wear-same-look/
So she’s not an idiot? Ban her!
This and other advertising spots featuring the same pun were received in some corners of the internet as a “eugenicist dog-whistle” implying the genes of a blonde, white woman were superior to others’.
No, no… I’m sure the genes of this mentally retarded Somali bulbhead with flies on his face are equally as good.
“I don’t think she’s pretty at all. Rather plain in fact”
Spot on. I’ve seen far better looking girls operating supermarket checkouts for a fraction of the money that Sidney is making…
“Rather plain in fact.”
True. But she’s got style. A plain woman with style works quite well.
That’s why they use her to sell clothes.
Ah! She’s a Republican. That explains the furore. If she’d been a feminist Democrat with they/them pronouns nobody would have an issue with her – I mean them.
‘star of controversial jeans ad’
Is it the jeans that are controversial, or the ad?
Neither. Commies call things they don’t like ‘controversial.’ The rest of the world wonders what the H are they talking about.
The Streisand Effect is in full force.
Dave W
There’s a young woman who works in our local Waitrose who would have a good chance at winning a contest to find the next Miss Brazil.
Her “plain” adjacent looks are the whole reason for her sex-appeal.
No normal fella, even drunk, imagines he’d have a chance with Gisele Bundchen or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley. But La Sweeney? Sure. Why not?
Imagine the furor if she advertises some white clothing.
“Sleb Not a Lefty” has been news for as long as I can remember.
“But La Sweeney? Sure. Why not?”
Well, I would.
But I suspect she wouldn’t.
Rather good Speccie article on why white females (or females with pale complexions) have been valued in most cultures forever:
https://archive.ph/pL66T
Bit of a problem, that. The Global Majority prefers white women.
@Recusant
No normal fella, even drunk, imagines he’d have a chance with Gisele Bundchen or Rosie Huntington-Whiteley
The “fella” being drunk is not the important bit.