Skip to content

Says man who cancels any dissent on his blog

Free speech is absolutely essential to democracy. Without the right to disagree, there is  quite literally no political freedom. It is only on the basis of disagreement that we can work out what is the right thing to do.

4 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Grist
Grist
6 months ago

He should go on the stage. The one with the noose hanging from the ceiling and the trapdoor in the floor…

Last edited 6 months ago by Grist
Chernyy Drakon
Chernyy Drakon
6 months ago

But he’s right. We need to be able to disagree with Spud so that he can show us his brilliance and superiority over us mere plebs.
Any further disagreement once he has explained the error of your thinking is simply trolling, probably of a neo-liberal nature.

Theophrastus
Theophrastus
6 months ago

Beware of false prophets…by their fruits ye shall know them.

Screenshot_20250909_164722_Chrome
KJP
KJP
6 months ago

I can’t stand the man but free speech is not the same as giving someone a platform.

Martin Near The M25
Martin Near The M25
6 months ago
Reply to  KJP

True, but he’s always claiming to want debate, until it looks like happening. The obvious place would be where he, to stretch a word, writes. Or at least where fist hits typewriter.

Ironman
Ironman
6 months ago

And when it’s not his blog, when it’s a paper in which he’s occasionally been lucky enough to get a piece, he posts a comment asking, not, instructing the editor to remove other people’s comments.
Yes, I did enjoy telling him he couldn’t do that because it wasn’t his gaff.

Ironman
Ironman
6 months ago

He’s right; free speech is essential. THE DEBATE IS OVER!

Ironman
Ironman
6 months ago
Reply to  Ironman

I’ve just read it all: truly remarkable. He expressly cites comedians being sacked as proof that free speech is being eroded. Yet search high and low for one word, just one word from him about the cancelling of Graham Linehan; you won’t find it. He purports to defend journalism. Yet search again, this time for his defences of Alison Pearson, of Julie Bindall, of Kathleen Stock, for his outrage at Joanne Rowling being doxed; you’ll be searching forever. He fears the arrest of Palestinian Action supporters is the end of all our freedoms (which might not be far off, to be fair). Yet he has demanded the no-platforming of so many people for the crime of not holding the exact same view that he holds.

Yes, he’s just a fucking arsehole. He’s also though now a friend of the leader of the Greens; he could actually very soon be a parliamentarian. Which makes you wonder just how many others just like him are skulking around one of the two houses.

Southerner
Southerner
6 months ago

How come we never see Murphy or the ASI Troll on these pages?

Marius
Marius
6 months ago
Reply to  Tim Worstall

Please ban the tedious halfwit who makes a misery of the ASI blog should it arrive here.

Rocco
Rocco
6 months ago

Hell, he has even banned me, as well as the donkey

Ed P
Ed P
6 months ago

The eyes have it.

That’s potato eyes of course

Norman
Norman
6 months ago

I have never seen a man whose bearing was so provoking and intolerable. To no opinion, which differed from his, he accorded the honour of even a condescending consideration. Everyone who contradicted him he treated with abject contempt; every argument that he did not like he answered either with biting scorn at the unfathomable ignorance that had prompted it, or with opprobrious aspersions upon the motives of him who had advanced it.

Remind you of someone? Actually it’s Carl Shurz on Marx (another utter cunt, except it seems to his kids), quoted by Sowell.

Bloke in South Dorset
Bloke in South Dorset
6 months ago

Free speech? Didn’t Murphy get a blogger sacked?

15
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x