you are under no moral obligations to become a fan of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Bernie Sanders, but to equate them with Trump (or say they are worse, as Wall Street leaders have done) means contributing to the destruction of democracy.
Ah, but then he’s a professor of politics at Princeton. Very sound that is therefore. Very sound toss.

Word salad of nonsense. Nice to know, though: “if you disagree with me, you are destroying democracy.”
The good professor cannot possibly fuck off far enough, or fast enough.
There are encouraging signs that Trump is going full retard frothing socialist, the credit card interest cap being a prime example. AOC and Sanders couldn’t do better.
You are under no moral obligations to become a fan of Trump but could you just stop fucking lying for a single moment, you pompus cunt?
.
tl;dr: ” I don’t like it when the other side wins the popular vote and then enforces the law…”
Trump 2.0 – for many an eternity of terrifying news and political traumas
And the article goes down hill from there.
Good. Let them suffer for their stupid, pernicious ideas.
.
The very people who are yelling about (for instance) the head of ICE Tom Homan being the new Himmler because his organisation has deported some 300,000 people absolutely fucking cheered when Obama gave the very same Tom Homan a ‘Presidential Rank Award for Distinguished Service, which is bestowed to leaders who’ve achieved sustained extraordinary results’ for deporting 920,000.
This Chris Bray piece is well worth a read too:
Snap back to reality, ope, there goes gravity
Ope, there goes Rabbit, he choked, he’s so mad
But he won’t give up that easy, no, he won’t have it
He knows his whole back’s to these ropes, it don’t matter
He’s dope, he knows that, but he’s broke, he’s so stagnant
Snap back to reality, ope, there goes gravity
Ope, there goes Rabbit, he choked, he’s so mad
But he won’t give up that easy, no, he won’t have it
He knows his whole back’s to these ropes, it don’t matter
He’s dope, he knows that, but he’s broke, he’s so stagnant
Recent exercises in taking stock after one year of Trump 2.0 – for many an eternity of terrifying news and political traumas – tended to leave something out: the fact that, a mere 12 months ago, plenty of pundits (and politicians, for that matter) were instructing us to accept that a global “vibe shift” in favor of the right had taken place. And that, in the face of what supposedly “felt” like a landslide, resistance was pointless and “cringe”
Through this word salad apparently people assumed Donald Trump, running counter to decades of Leftwing control, had achieved ‘lasting victory’, even had people made such assumptions we were fortunate to have the likes of Time continually profiling the likes of Richard Murphy (for example) and various other retarded liberals. Such people’s commitment to evil is eternal. I never once doubted they would keep coming back. Anyone familiar with the behaviour of parasites in nature would have been able to predict it.
Well, it doesn’t feel like that today. But understanding why observers not generally in the pro-Trump propaganda business rushed to portray the spirit of the age as effectively far-right is important. A way of thinking occasionally dubbed “reactionary centrism” plays an important role; it could yet again become influential in hindering or at least holding up post-Trump radical reforms which US democracy desperately requires.
That notorious ‘Far Right’ – that would be the one wanting every Jew in the world murdered which ran rampant across those notorious Hotbeds of ‘Far right’ activism, US universities for every day since October 7th – that ‘Far right’?
This perceptive observation was inadvertently vindicated in thousands of columns that contributed to a moral panic about “wokeness” and “identity politics”. It convinced readers that, sure, Trump was horrible, but what was happening “on campus” (translation: anecdotes from one or two elite places, endlessly recycled) was also putting US democracy in peril.
The point is not that what progressives do must never be criticized; the point is that the relentless drive to find fault with both sides equally results in a sense of (false) equivalence among those taking cues from supposedly trustworthy centrists.
I actually find this reasonably compelling albeit for diametrically opposite reasons. There is no equivalence between Right and Left wing. The latter wants to eliminate billions of people as surplus carbon. They want to control every aspect of individual’s lives. They molest children, whether through Big Trans or the rest of the Alphabet soup experiment. They waged biological warfare on the entire world with a synthetic virus as a ‘dry run’ to implement a system of social control. They are racist, sexist, anti-human and have murdered millions, whether that is through active Socialist regimes, through abortion on demand and increasingly through legalized euthanasia. There is no equivalence whatsoever.
The people of Vermont seem to like him enough to vote him in as Senator. People elsewhere aren’t as keen of him so he fails to get the get the party nomination to run for President. That’s democracy for you. It’s also evidence the Vermont is an odd place. Another piece of evidence is that it easily ranks lowest of all the US states by nominal GDP.
Yes but it’s rather rural, isn’t it? How about GDP per capita? And do many of its wealthy residents work elsewhere?
Vermont appreciates Sanders’ entertainment value.
Germans do tend to be the most pathetic of progressives. We should bomb them again.
I’m sure he wishes it was…. That’s one of the most loaded Red Flag statements I’ve seen in a while.
Since when is looking at both sides of any given issue, and deciding the Truth ( or most practical/pragmatic solution ) is somewhere between the extremes A Bad Thing?
Not enough scorn in the world….
That is called . . . democracy. The losing side ACCEPTS the loss, and allows the winners to proceed. The losers re-evaluate their positions before the next election.
Democrats demand resistance. The exact opposite of democracy.
Herr Müller suggests equivalence in Left/right extremes. Completely bogus. He puts on a cloak of decency. “Everybody knows how bad the right it.” Leftie extremism gets the criticism because it’s really stupid and evil. In a word, ‘extreme.’