Jeffrey Epstein described Peter Mandelson as “devious” after lobbying a bank to underwrite a mining project launched by their mutual friend Nat Rothschild, emails included in the latest tranche of Epstein files suggest.
That would have been Bumi. Which went wholly tits up in very spectaular fashion. Almost Madoff in fact. On this one specific basis – sure, coal mining in Indonesia is corrupt and political. But we can beat that, benefit from that, right?
Well, not really, no.
Well spotted, Jeff!
Has Nat Rothschild ever made a successful investment?
Bumi being a very apt name where Mandy is concerned
Don’t forget our illustrious Prime Minister! Allegedly…
It shows he’s not as big a wheel as he’d like to be. Gates, Clinton, Trump and even poor, sad little Mandy. But no Starmer!
No Starmer?
“Showing 1 to 10 of 29 Results” it says.
Very little Starmer, I’ll grant you. But then he is very little.
You wouldn’t invite Starmer unless you were desperate for guests and also Starmer only came into a useful role after Epstein’s days were over.
I’m shocked that BoJo was never part of the in crowd.
We already knew that Boris had trouble keeping his trousers on, so the value of any compromising photos was limited.
To be fair to BoJo he never had much trouble in the bedroom. Mainly just leaving afterwards without the press finding out. One gets the impression that a lot of Epstein’s marks were men who had managed to get very wealthy, but weren’t exactly that sexually alluring, even with their wealth attached. Offering willing young women was pure cat nip to them.
Sounds like a Bernard Manning joke: ” So Epstein, Mandelson and Rothschild walk into a bank…”
Just how devious do you have to be, to be described by Epstein as devious?
As devious as an iguana pretending to be frozen.
“Hey Juan. I got zese idea. We fall outta da tree and go stiff and de humans put us in front of heater and feed us chicken.”
Actually that does rather sound like being on Epstein island.
Praise from Caesar.
In other news, Muslims again:
A Labour mayor helped to hide evidence when her son was arrested on suspicion of raping a 15-year-old girl, a court has been told.
Naheed Ejaz, 61, allowed her ‘mother’s love for a son to stretch to criminality’ by refusing to let police officers into her home when they came to arrest him, it was heard.
Ejaz, who had been Mayor of Bracknell Forest from 2023 to 2024, in Berkshire, is said to have delayed their entry for ‘some minutes’.
She also spoke to her son, Diwan Khan, 41, in Urdu to ‘assist’ him in hiding his phone which had a video on it of the alleged sex attack, Winchester Crown Court heard.
Mr Khan – who was her Consort of the Mayor – is accused of raping a 15-year-old girl in June 2024 after she ‘blacked out’ from the MDMA that he put in vodka for her to drink.
Amazing how many followers of this peaceful religion love raping little girls.
In Bracknell.
When not crying about “Islamophobia”, they love running for office so they can obtain power over you.
“In my experience the main difference between oppressors and the oppressed is opportunity.” – Hugh Bicheno
Meanwhile…
It’s their culcha innit bruv?
They’re burning Peter Mandelson:
Starmer forced to change plans on Mandelson document release after anger from own MPs
He’s not being given the usual protection or benefit of the doubt you’d expect a senior disgraced politician to receive, just the flamethrower. (None of the officials involved in the grooming gang scandals or Post Office Horizon or the Iraq war have ever been punished, afaik, consequences like these are rare)
The only other thing I’ve ever seen like it is the treatment of Prince Andrew. Public humiliation, bullied out of his entitlements and sent to Norfolk over the same thing, friendship with Jeffrey Epstein. Unprecedented disgrace.
Why is Epstein so radioactive?
Because most of the bigwig wick-dippers are American Democrats. Randy Andy and Mandy are both conveniently British, in the UK, and disposable. It’s a massive trans-Atlantic dead cat. When are Obama and the Clintons going to be examined?
Seen on Politico:
‘Comeback Kid’ no more: Dems aren’t protecting the Clintons from Epstein scrutiny
The party-wide reluctance to defend two former standard-bearers signals a rejection of the Clinton brand.
Hill and Bill seem to have little pull these days. They’re both horribly old, rich and white and worse than that, she failed against Trump. The new Democratic Party doesn’t think a bj is a minor, understandable indiscretion, they think heterosexuality is rape and nobody’s white on stolen Palestinian abortion clinics, or whatever it is they’re ranting about these days.
It’s not a trans-Atlantic dead cat, few people in the US know or care. It’s not about distracting CNN. This is a particularly British, unusually vicious shunning, the British establishment is basically un-personning the both of them. They’re not sympathetic victims, but I don’t think we’ve seen anyone from the British ruling class, so to speak, treated like this before in our lifetimes and I wonder what it means.
Andy’s just a cunt. His unpersoning, while extreme, is an understandable part of the woke Firm’s self-defence. Mandy is the interesting case, being the total Establishment insider. He knows where a lot of bodies are buried, so it’s a high-risk strategy.
As for Starmer’s misjudgement in appointing him as US Ambassador: Mandy was clearly the only Labour grandee with the political skill, reptilian smarm and deep-pocket contacts able to mislead, contain and with luck undermine Trump. The obvious choice, undone by the assumption that the Epstein files would never be released in full. The Dems had too much at risk for that, so the Dem establishment would never allow it, would they?
Trump’s shock and awe unravelled that little calculation.
Who is operating Starmer? Blair wouldn’t be so inept. Neither, I’d have thought, would Xi. Ursula?
If only they had the same attitude towards Muslim grooming gangs…
Come on Norman. The Clintons will adopt the same tactic as Hillary when testifying in the Whitewater scandal. “I do not recall”, “I have no recollection of that”.