So the wimmins finally get true choice. It is indeed possible to enjoy that shaggin’ bit and yet also not have 10 kids.
So now they moan about how difficult choiecs are.
Welcome to reality, Honeys.
Sigh.
Here we are with that second lesson of the two that economics teaches us. There are always opportunity costs. Sorry about that but doing the one thing means not doing some, or many, others. That’s just the way the universe operates. There ain’t nuttin’ anyone can do about it either. So, please Dear Lord, shut it and get on with it?
The problems faced by “child free” women (interesting new terminology) are ultimately downplayed as easy and trivial.
Just wait until they hit the “family support-free” stage.
By dedicating 2 hours daily to this online job, I brought in $16,453 last month. It’s incredibly simple to start and doesn’t require any specific skills, making it perfect for anyone. For a student like me, this has been the ultimate solution to balancing my studies and finances…
.
For More… Rb.gy/axcdam
Childfree now, is it? Rather than childless? I think we should rehabilitate “spinster”.
Child-free or child-less is one way societies – and civilisations – commit suicide…
“A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within”. Will Durant
In Singapore there is a mob of women called “helpers” i.e. domestic servants, effectively nanny-cum-cook-cum-cleaner. They make life much easier for couples who both work.
Singapore gives visas for helpers only to citizens of certain nations: Philippines OK, Indonesia not OK, and so on. It seems to work.
A birth rate of 0.87 suggests tha it doesn’t.
Indonesia is definitely inlcuded. As is the, currently, much preferred Burmese
“New” terminology? I’ve heard it since at least the 1980s.