Skip to content

In The Guardian

Your editorial (11 March) is correct in insisting that the economist and philosopher Adam Smith used “invisible hand” only once in The Wealth of Nations: to discuss investing at home or abroad, not as a general description of economic structure.

If the capital is invested at home, the decision to do that being purely a selfish and personal one, then, as if led by an invisible hand, this benefits the domestic economy.

Which is true, so we’d better be careful about deterring investment at home through the confiscatory taxation of either the wealth or the profits from having benefited the society by investing at home.
Tim Worstall
Senior fellow, Adam Smith Institute, London

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Anonymous
Anonymous
1 month ago

By dedicating 2 hours daily to this online job, I brought in $16,453 last month. It’s incredibly simple to start and doesn’t require any specific skills, making it perfect for anyone. For a student like me, this has been the ultimate solution to balancing my studies and finances…
.
For More…….. Rb.gy/axcdam

bloke in spain
bloke in spain
1 month ago
Reply to  Anonymous

Harassing people in comment sections? Not a job I’d want. MD’s wouldn’t take you?

Gamecock
Gamecock
1 month ago
Reply to  bloke in spain

It’s 80 bucks. Conversion rate of Guyana dollars to US dollars is 1 to 0.005.

bloke in spain
bloke in spain
1 month ago
Reply to  Gamecock

Guyana? This a Baron Tottenham scam?

Gamecock
Gamecock
1 month ago
Reply to  bloke in spain

His link is ‘Rb.gy.’ ‘.gy’ is internet nation code for Guyana.

Gamecock
Gamecock
1 month ago

Worstall published in Guardian? Start of something big?

Me
Me
1 month ago
Reply to  Gamecock

It wasn’t last time. Thirteen years ago.

andyf
andyf
1 month ago
Reply to  Gamecock

Probably the end of the career of the Guardian employee who accepted the letter.

dearieme
dearieme
1 month ago

Talking of the Guardian: I find some accusations of anti-semitism to be bogus or downright dishonest. But this case seems reasonably persuasive to me. I suppose it’s because Jews have been so careless as to be white.

https://archive.ph/pfLRM

10
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x