Skip to content

Twats

The human point of view is presented mostly on an aural level, through the use of voiceover. Laid over Ascension’s unique landscape, conversations with geological experts muse on the relationship between humans and nature. Unfortunately, many of these discussions lean towards the philosophical and speculative, offering little historical and practical insight into the pitfalls of terraforming. None of the interviewees are from the global south, which is also problematic, considering the primarily imperialist impulse behind the desire to reshape and conquer this so-called uncharted territory.

Ascension Island was terra nullius when Europeans discovered it. So what the Global South has to do with it?

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

14 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Norman
Norman
1 month ago

Because. Y’know, just because.

John
John
1 month ago

Because being a geologist makes you an expert on human relationships.

Boganboy
Boganboy
1 month ago

‘So what the Global South has to do with it?’

They don’t own it yet??

Charlie Suet
Charlie Suet
1 month ago
Reply to  Boganboy

Give Starmer, Hermer and Sands time. There are only so many hours in the day.

Bloke in South Dorset
Bloke in South Dorset
1 month ago
Reply to  Charlie Suet

I thought you had to give lawyers more than just time.

EvilDrSmith
EvilDrSmith
1 month ago
Reply to  Boganboy

Well, Ascension Island is south of the equator.
Also, it was a key station in supporting the Royal Navy’s West Africa Squadron that was tasked with stopping the Atlantic slave trade – including from southern Africa to Brazil – but stopping the Global South from engaging in slavery was apparently an Imperial Impulse.

Gamecock
Gamecock
1 month ago

“We hate you. The end.”

gareth
gareth
1 month ago

When I read the word “problematic” I reach for my revolver…

rhoda klapp
rhoda klapp
1 month ago
Reply to  gareth

See also:

tackle
unacceptable
it is right that we should
Let me be perfectly clear
‘our’ nhs or whatever
There is no evidence
We need to have a conversation
I have a plan
vulnerable
Anything containing ‘harm’
Mis- and Disinformation

Norman
Norman
1 month ago
Reply to  rhoda klapp

“community”

This is a “community”, right here, but not one that those who usually use this word would acknowledge or approve.

Last edited 1 month ago by Norman
Ted S., Catskill Mtns, NY, USA
Ted S., Catskill Mtns, NY, USA
1 month ago
Reply to  rhoda klapp

“Stakeholders”

Theophrastus
Theophrastus
1 month ago
Reply to  rhoda klapp

“According to experts…”
“A new report shows…”

Bongo
Bongo
1 month ago

“Is . . problematic” – that’s University of Sussex speak for isn’t a problem but might be in the future – well get back to us when it becomes one darling

Bloke in South Dorset
Bloke in South Dorset
1 month ago
Reply to  Bongo

I thought ‘problematic’ just meant ‘I disapprove of this, but can’t come up with a convincing argument why’

14
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x