They must be desperate, have you seen the picture? I’d need my beer goggles on and I haven’t got my todger moist since Gordon Brown moved into No. 10. (No causal link.)
Not sure about that. The Times also does pieces like this – all part of the feminisation of newspapers (and wider society).
Western Bloke
1 month ago
To be fair, if you’re not going to fuck your wife…
I don’t believe this “too tired” thing. Everyone has time. No-one is a 16 hour working machine. Everyone lies about “putting in 100 hours”. Even if you are on the clock for 100 hours, you aren’t working flat out. You might be waiting for a thing to happen”. The one time I worked 100 hours, it was monitoring a system, mostly. Drinking coffee, reading the paper, glancing over at what was going on. I could have had the girlfriend bent over a desk. These blokes in the city doing 100 hours, are mostly waiting around a lot.
If you are watching Eastenders, you have time to get ploughed. If you’re fiddling with model railways, you have time to fuck your wife.
There are lots of football/outdoor sports widows. Men that *have* to go to every single Reading Town game, even if it’s in Tyneside. Or spend their weekend mountain biking with their mates. I know someone who did this to his wife and she started asking a neighbour to to a few little DIY jobs. And honestly, his wife was hot and 28.
I Disagree. If you take marriage vows like “have and hold” “love and cherish” and fail to honour them, then it’s perfectly reasonable for the other person to cancel out the “forsaking all others” part. That person has every right to fuck someone else without having to go through the turmoil of divorce.
That’s a completely different thing to a man neglecting his horny wife and banging the secretary. or adding twice a week with Miss Jones to Mrs Perrin.
And in this case, it seems like mutual agreement. Like I don’t go and see Andrew Lloyd-Webber musicals with my wife. I’ve made this clear, and she doesn’t even ask now. And I’m perfectly happy with her going with a mate. She’s happy as she gets to see Evita, and I’m happy that she’s happy and that I don’t see Evita (the David Essex song is a banger, mind).
This is just the gay version of that. “you know, I’m not really into vagina, can you get a friend to fuck it instead”. It seems damn weird to me, but two adults agree to a thing and who am I to argue?
If you take marriage vows like “have and hold” “love and cherish” and fail to honour them, then it’s perfectly reasonable for the other person to cancel out the “forsaking all others” part. That person has every right to fuck someone else without having to go through the turmoil of divorce.
That’s the neat part: they don’t!
You either keep your promises, or your word means nothing. Divorce is a bad outcome, but it’s not the worst outcome. At least it’s honest. Divorced people aren’t pretending to still be married whilst making a mockery of the institution of marriage. What kind of faithless heart bases its morality on the sins of others? Spousal neglect, infidelity or abuse may well be good grounds for separation, it’s never a good excuse to do awful things yourself. Because in the end, there are no excuses.
In a world full of Smeagols and Wormtongues, be Samwise Gamgee instead.
The detail of the story is that he would go off with his mates, and they had a baby to look after. So she was stuck most weekends with the baby.
Michael van der Riet
1 month ago
When sex goes out the door, love goes out the window. It is a husband’s duty to give his wife her rations. It is his duty to remain sexually attractive to her. He’s failed in his duty and is only getting what he thoroughly deserves.
Rainy day lovers don’t love any others, that would not be kind. If your husband or wife suggests “opening” your marriage, the marriage is already dead and you need to walk away immediately like De Niro in Heat.
But I was waiting for this punchline, and was not disappointed:
I’ve come to accept that Nate will always be married to his job, but our marriage is strong, trusting and very sexual now. Perhaps more couples should try it?
Hell loves company, so the hellbound heart will always try to entice other souls to come meet Pinhead and the gang. The purpose of these articles is always to proselytise immorality.
I do generally agree with that. People that want an open marriage just want to fuck other people. Either they shouldn’t be married to that person, or they’re simply not the marrying type.
I suspect that this guy isn’t really the marrying type. Whether just wimp or gay. Maybe did it to keep his mother happy. If my wife was fucking other men, even if it was because my dick got severed in an accident and I just wanted her to be happy, I absolutely would not be doing videos about it with her.
And I don’t know about her, but I reckon if she had a husband that was nailing her, she wouldn’t be doing this. “Since January, I have been dating a British construction worker, Jack,* who I met at a polyamorous social event.”. Yeah, construction worker. Sort of guy that finishes work has a quick drink with the boys and goes home to fuck his wife ragged. She probably doesn’t mind him fucking other women as it gives her vag a rest.
Indeed. That’s a dead giveaway. This is not just a sex-starved woman playing away. She’s clearly a selfish sociopath and if he had any self-respect, hubby would give her the elbow. I didn’t read the Terriblegraph story so I don’t know if there’s any children involved. I hope not.
You said earlier, “The purpose of these articles is always to proselytise immorality.” Well, they do if it’s women. I don’t think they’d be running a profile of some philandering bloke headlined: “My wife got a bit porky when she hit 40, so I’ve been shagging birds I meet on the apps.”
The thing with nearly all the old media is that it’s now girl coded. Men are much faster at adopting new technologies so got into the internet, both from the perspective of creating and consuming. And men are more money than status driven. So if the more valuable thing was doing YouTube, that’s where they went.
VCRs took a lot of male viewing from TV. You could rent porn, rent violent movies. Men stopped caring so much about Dennis Waterman getting into a fight when they could watch Commando or First Blood. Nerds did a lot of really good science stuff on YouTube and that pulled more men to that. Early blogging was almost entirely set up by men. Look down BBC and ITV’s schedule and it’s nearly all lifestyle, antiques, reality, soap opera.
The BBC will have an article like How Return of Kings used outrage to sell extreme ideas that says The site feature such headlines as “The myth of date rape drink spiking”, “How to turn a feminist into your sex slave” and “How to convince a girl to get an abortion”.
That’s girl-coded. The first of those is statistically accurate. But women don’t like to be told that they got hammered and shagged anyone. They don’t like being used for sex by men, but men do. And they don’t like the idea of being used and dumped, even though they generally like the idea of abortion when it suits them, and the BBC would never write something about “my wife aborted our baby without asking me”.
So most newspapers are a lot like Cosmo or Good Housekeeping now.
Not really because the old media used to be a lot more pro-male. Look at what used to be on like Tomorrow’s World, Blackadder, loads of football and wrestling. There were a few cookery shows and hospital dramas for the ladies, but it was balanced.
Why is porn about male fantasies? Because that’s who buys it. Why is written erotica about female fantasies? Because that’s who buys it. If the men are off playing Call of Duty and the only people watching TV are chicks, it’s going to get orientated around chicks.
I felt the bile rising after the first few lines and stopped reading, so it may be that she went on to explain why the need arose for her to do an upside-down twerk in front of, well, everybody, and I just did not get that far.
So, Bueller, did she? Or does she consider it goes without saying that writing something like this in public is, what, self-validating, or empowering, or some other bollocks?
And what’s all this balls about ‘sleeping’ with other men.
She doesn’t sleep with them, she gets pile-driven by them.
Why this particular coyness about ‘sleeping’ given that she’s just made her children for actual fuck’s sake publicly complicit in the knocking shop of her life?
I mean, I am an awful specimen of a human being but, fuck me. I wouldn’t do that to my kids or my parents. Much less to my empty husk of a spouse (if I had an empty husk of a spouse).
Has she checked his nurse or receptionist ?
She’s clearly happily married to his money
Selfish you say, but she’s making plenty of other men happy,
For free, too.
They must be desperate, have you seen the picture? I’d need my beer goggles on and I haven’t got my todger moist since Gordon Brown moved into No. 10. (No causal link.)
Until they decide they’ve had enough of her crap.
Well, at least he’ll know how to treat the VD she’ll get….
Alas he might get it as well!!
How did I know without reading the story that she’d be an American?
How did I know it was going to be the telegraph?
Even the guardian and mail would pass on this pound-shop fifty shades slop.
Not sure about that. The Times also does pieces like this – all part of the feminisation of newspapers (and wider society).
To be fair, if you’re not going to fuck your wife…
I don’t believe this “too tired” thing. Everyone has time. No-one is a 16 hour working machine. Everyone lies about “putting in 100 hours”. Even if you are on the clock for 100 hours, you aren’t working flat out. You might be waiting for a thing to happen”. The one time I worked 100 hours, it was monitoring a system, mostly. Drinking coffee, reading the paper, glancing over at what was going on. I could have had the girlfriend bent over a desk. These blokes in the city doing 100 hours, are mostly waiting around a lot.
If you are watching Eastenders, you have time to get ploughed. If you’re fiddling with model railways, you have time to fuck your wife.
There are lots of football/outdoor sports widows. Men that *have* to go to every single Reading Town game, even if it’s in Tyneside. Or spend their weekend mountain biking with their mates. I know someone who did this to his wife and she started asking a neighbour to to a few little DIY jobs. And honestly, his wife was hot and 28.
That’s what divorce is for.
I Disagree. If you take marriage vows like “have and hold” “love and cherish” and fail to honour them, then it’s perfectly reasonable for the other person to cancel out the “forsaking all others” part. That person has every right to fuck someone else without having to go through the turmoil of divorce.
That’s a completely different thing to a man neglecting his horny wife and banging the secretary. or adding twice a week with Miss Jones to Mrs Perrin.
And in this case, it seems like mutual agreement. Like I don’t go and see Andrew Lloyd-Webber musicals with my wife. I’ve made this clear, and she doesn’t even ask now. And I’m perfectly happy with her going with a mate. She’s happy as she gets to see Evita, and I’m happy that she’s happy and that I don’t see Evita (the David Essex song is a banger, mind).
This is just the gay version of that. “you know, I’m not really into vagina, can you get a friend to fuck it instead”. It seems damn weird to me, but two adults agree to a thing and who am I to argue?
If you take marriage vows like “have and hold” “love and cherish” and fail to honour them, then it’s perfectly reasonable for the other person to cancel out the “forsaking all others” part. That person has every right to fuck someone else without having to go through the turmoil of divorce.
That’s the neat part: they don’t!
You either keep your promises, or your word means nothing. Divorce is a bad outcome, but it’s not the worst outcome. At least it’s honest. Divorced people aren’t pretending to still be married whilst making a mockery of the institution of marriage. What kind of faithless heart bases its morality on the sins of others? Spousal neglect, infidelity or abuse may well be good grounds for separation, it’s never a good excuse to do awful things yourself. Because in the end, there are no excuses.
In a world full of Smeagols and Wormtongues, be Samwise Gamgee instead.
Why should she be penalized for his failures?
Has the wife thought of taking up mountain biking so they can do it together sometime?
The detail of the story is that he would go off with his mates, and they had a baby to look after. So she was stuck most weekends with the baby.
When sex goes out the door, love goes out the window. It is a husband’s duty to give his wife her rations. It is his duty to remain sexually attractive to her. He’s failed in his duty and is only getting what he thoroughly deserves.
You believe everything a self-confessed whore tells you at face value, eh?
The Telegraph still maintains its reputation for informed reporting.
A whore does it for money, by the way. Moralizing should be limited to those who have had their children DNA tested.
Moralising? How is it moralising to call a turd a turd?
Steve you are a turd.
Don’t marry me then
Rainy day lovers don’t love any others, that would not be kind. If your husband or wife suggests “opening” your marriage, the marriage is already dead and you need to walk away immediately like De Niro in Heat.
But I was waiting for this punchline, and was not disappointed:
I’ve come to accept that Nate will always be married to his job, but our marriage is strong, trusting and very sexual now. Perhaps more couples should try it?
Hell loves company, so the hellbound heart will always try to entice other souls to come meet Pinhead and the gang. The purpose of these articles is always to proselytise immorality.
My favourite Lightfoot song.
Also mine. Gordon Lightfoot is why acoustic guitars were invented.
I do generally agree with that. People that want an open marriage just want to fuck other people. Either they shouldn’t be married to that person, or they’re simply not the marrying type.
I suspect that this guy isn’t really the marrying type. Whether just wimp or gay. Maybe did it to keep his mother happy. If my wife was fucking other men, even if it was because my dick got severed in an accident and I just wanted her to be happy, I absolutely would not be doing videos about it with her.
And I don’t know about her, but I reckon if she had a husband that was nailing her, she wouldn’t be doing this. “Since January, I have been dating a British construction worker, Jack,* who I met at a polyamorous social event.”. Yeah, construction worker. Sort of guy that finishes work has a quick drink with the boys and goes home to fuck his wife ragged. She probably doesn’t mind him fucking other women as it gives her vag a rest.
Normal people don’t go to “polyamorous social events”.
Indeed. That’s a dead giveaway. This is not just a sex-starved woman playing away. She’s clearly a selfish sociopath and if he had any self-respect, hubby would give her the elbow. I didn’t read the Terriblegraph story so I don’t know if there’s any children involved. I hope not.
You said earlier, “The purpose of these articles is always to proselytise immorality.” Well, they do if it’s women. I don’t think they’d be running a profile of some philandering bloke headlined: “My wife got a bit porky when she hit 40, so I’ve been shagging birds I meet on the apps.”
Most of Clown World’s propaganda is aimed at women because the Enemy especially covets the tender hearts of our wives, sisters and daughters.
But the soil of a man’s heart is stonier, Marius. A man grows what he can and he tends it.
The thing with nearly all the old media is that it’s now girl coded. Men are much faster at adopting new technologies so got into the internet, both from the perspective of creating and consuming. And men are more money than status driven. So if the more valuable thing was doing YouTube, that’s where they went.
VCRs took a lot of male viewing from TV. You could rent porn, rent violent movies. Men stopped caring so much about Dennis Waterman getting into a fight when they could watch Commando or First Blood. Nerds did a lot of really good science stuff on YouTube and that pulled more men to that. Early blogging was almost entirely set up by men. Look down BBC and ITV’s schedule and it’s nearly all lifestyle, antiques, reality, soap opera.
The BBC will have an article like How Return of Kings used outrage to sell extreme ideas that says The site feature such headlines as “The myth of date rape drink spiking”, “How to turn a feminist into your sex slave” and “How to convince a girl to get an abortion”.
That’s girl-coded. The first of those is statistically accurate. But women don’t like to be told that they got hammered and shagged anyone. They don’t like being used for sex by men, but men do. And they don’t like the idea of being used and dumped, even though they generally like the idea of abortion when it suits them, and the BBC would never write something about “my wife aborted our baby without asking me”.
So most newspapers are a lot like Cosmo or Good Housekeeping now.
The simplest (and true) explanation for the media is malice.
Not really because the old media used to be a lot more pro-male. Look at what used to be on like Tomorrow’s World, Blackadder, loads of football and wrestling. There were a few cookery shows and hospital dramas for the ladies, but it was balanced.
Why is porn about male fantasies? Because that’s who buys it. Why is written erotica about female fantasies? Because that’s who buys it. If the men are off playing Call of Duty and the only people watching TV are chicks, it’s going to get orientated around chicks.
Or have a “life coach”?
Normal people do not agree with Tim Worstall.
Tedious twat. Capering cunt.
“We’re all normal and we want our freedom.”
Women doctors, on the other hand, work part time because they don’t give a shit about their patients.
Their over-representation on picket lines, as opposed to actually curing and caring for patients, makes that abundantly clear.
Nate is a pathetic cuck, she is a whore and I feel sorry for the kids.
I understand why we uaed to burn witches now.
By the way. I stopped trying to read this garbage in the first couple of paragraphs. It’s like some short story in Womans Own.
Oh what would Bill Deedes say ?
It really is a terrible rag these days. I hope the new owners go through the hacks and management with a buzzsaw.
Send the fuckers to the Saudi Arabian embassy, one at a time.
I felt the bile rising after the first few lines and stopped reading, so it may be that she went on to explain why the need arose for her to do an upside-down twerk in front of, well, everybody, and I just did not get that far.
So, Bueller, did she? Or does she consider it goes without saying that writing something like this in public is, what, self-validating, or empowering, or some other bollocks?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yhcR1g09YxI
And what’s all this balls about ‘sleeping’ with other men.
She doesn’t sleep with them, she gets pile-driven by them.
Why this particular coyness about ‘sleeping’ given that she’s just made her children for actual fuck’s sake publicly complicit in the knocking shop of her life?
I mean, I am an awful specimen of a human being but, fuck me. I wouldn’t do that to my kids or my parents. Much less to my empty husk of a spouse (if I had an empty husk of a spouse).