The United Nations is reviewing whether Sir Keir Starmer’s Chagos surrender breaches international human rights laws in what could jeopardise the deal.
Officials are assessing allegations that the Prime Minister is committing a “crime against humanity” for attempting to evict native Chagossians from the archipelago as part of his plans to cede the British territory to Mauritius.
The entire pay to give it away idea stems from the ‘uman rights lawyers. Hoist petard etc.
Of course, the reaction is going to be but, but, that’s not real ‘uman rights law, is it?
Do we think TTK will be asking the question, “How many divisions does International Law have?”
No, the snivelling coward hasn’t got the balls.
I can’t believe even Starmer tried this one. I know he’s mentally not all there, as though a Martian had landed on earth after WWVI and found some bits of what he thought was a human being but no instructions anywhere, re-assmbled it and the result was MTK. He could only find damaged recordings of a human voice aqnd so we have the adenoidal ramblings that he uses when he’s trying to pretend to be a statesman.
It was so obviously a way to make him and his mates incredibly rich and for no other fathomable reason. It went against every principle he ever said he had, right down to refusing the Chagos Islanders the right to return to their own home. I think whoever is running him will now just throw him away as too faulty to be of any use. Even the abject failures in the EU must see that Jean-Claude was a paragon compared to this PoS…
Actually there’s quite a lot to that theory that I like. Sort of sounds a bit like that Star Trek pilot The Cage.
My personal theory is that Spanner underwent some brainwashing after being captured by the Chinese and is some kind of Manchurian Candidate. Problem is they released him too soon and he is still in automaton state.
Occams razor suggests the true answer is currently shielded by a superinjunction.
As long as that stays in place he will kowtow to both friend and foe.
I wonder how soon after his fall (presumably after the locals) the superinjunction will be removed. If the gagged issue is just embarrassing for him then probably fairly quickly. But if it leads into wider corruption, compromised national security and/or further embarrassment for new incumbents, then a long time or not at all.
Regarding this superinjunction, why have the goodies not been reported in some jurisdiction where they don’t give a fuck about the English High Court?
(maybe they have, but I am unaware of it).
Superinjunction. When I look at Starmer I find the idea that he might be a sex object in a world of gay rumpy-pumpy incredible. But then again, I thought Rolf Harris was just a kindly old duffer.
And there is, of course, the alleged Scottish Lavender Superinjunction concerning people no more becoming than Starmer.
It’s a funny old world.
What and where is the evidence that Starmer has used super-injunctions for personal cover??
Look behind the definition of superinjunction in the dictionary.
When you buy your Manchurian Candidate on Temu
Rites law == rule by lawyers 🙁
Of course real Human Rights Law has never been tried
…
After he gives Chagos away, what does he give away next? Jersey? Wales?
The UK. To the EU, and muslims.
Oh, he’s already done that.
Now, come on, be fair. He’s had help in all of that, going back decades.
Falklands, Gibraltar…
The Channel Islands might be getting a bit nervous.
Ah, Chagos.
What a mess. But fun to watch, like making lawyers wrestle pigs.
I would pay a lot to see Hermer doing that!
Don’t forget the superinjunction!
Fighting in the ranks, the left eating their own. More popcorn here, please.
Weren’t the “native Chagossians” evicted in the 1960s by Wilson? I use quotes, as how can they be native when they were forcibly transplanted there by the French from Mozambique in the 1790s.
If there wasn’t a bunch of grifting lawyers grifting against other grifting lawyers there’d be no grifting. Instead we get at least twice the amount of grifting. Trebles all round!