Skip to content

Well, quite, a very important aspect this is, Missus

Luba Kassova, lead author of the report, said: “What we concluded by doing this analysis is that the gender-inequality lens is all but missing from coverage of the Epstein story. This means that news coverage does not get to the root causes of the problem.”

Birds able to screw $50k a year – which is the sort of value of a freebie apartment in New York – out of blokes for the very occasional blow job. Taking advantage of male idiocy in this way is very gender unequal.

Media coverage of violence against women and girls and misogynistic harassment is at a “pitiful” low, despite a proliferation of high-profile cases of men abusing women and children, and a rise in AI-assisted violence against women and girls, new research shows.

Of course, given that this report stems from the same “university” that used to employ Spud – Islington Tech – they get this the wrong way around. This is, of course, abuse of male sexuality by those with the monopoly on what men desire.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

30 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ottokring
Ottokring
1 month ago

Luba Kassova sounds like one of the services these Epstein girls might have performed.

Jimmers
Jimmers
1 month ago

When reporting on high-profile cases of men who have perpetrated the serial abuse of women and girls, publications should offer explanations, uncovering the root causes of the problem by exposing the gender inequality that contributes to abuse of power, patriarchal norms andmisogynistic culture,
Like Pakistani rape gangs fer instance?

Dan Souter
Dan Souter
1 month ago
Reply to  Jimmers

Not that sort, obviously. Luba Kassova would probably agree with the statement “Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.”

Problems can only be viewed through the blinkered focus on white indigenous British. All others get a free pass.

Andrew C
Andrew C
1 month ago

“AI-assisted violence against women and girls”

What on earth is that?

M
M
1 month ago
Reply to  Andrew C

I’m guessing that’s a reference to the image generators that input a picture of a person and generate another image of them without clothes.

It’s all so tiresome.

Norman
Norman
1 month ago
Reply to  M

One that only exists as pixels, let’s not forget. Back in the old days, if one could draw, a bit of tracing paper and imagination were all that were required. Where’s the difference apart from instant upload?

Bloke in Callao
Bloke in Callao
1 month ago
Reply to  Norman

Your uploads may be instant – at my age it takes a bit longer.

Marius
Marius
1 month ago

I am happy to accept that Epstein groomed and abused underage girls, alongside the vast numbers of willing adult whores. However, who were his accomplices in this? Women like Maxwell and Giuffre. The latter did not appear as a witness against the former, mainly because other witnesses felt she should be one of the accused.

Media coverage of violence against women and girls and misogynistic harassment is at a “pitiful” low

Well that is certainly true. I see tons of social media complaints by women and girls who feel unsafe on Britain’s streets, yet the Graun inexplicably fails to cover it.

 a rise in AI-assisted violence against women and girls,

Of course, women are terrified that Chat GPT is going to follow them home from a nightclub and gang rape them.

John
John
1 month ago
Reply to  Marius

Just a thought.

As our cultural enrichers, while lacking passports, all have smartphones might it be a wise precaution to examine their browsing history in order to protect young British women from the Abduls taking every opportunity to turn their dreams into reality?

No. That would be racist.

Norman
Norman
1 month ago
Reply to  Marius

Ah, yes. Five Guys Named Mo.

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Marius

I’m sick of hearing about Jeffrey Epstein. The Left wasn’t interested in him at all until Donald Trump said there was no “client list” in the US government’s possession. Now Epstein is just a meaningless insult, like calling someone a fascist. And a choose-your-own-adventure conspiracy theory, like qanon.

Anyway, Jazzy Jeff didn’t need to “groom” anybody. He was a billionaire. Clunge threw itself at him. All the people burned by their association with Epstein had bad intentions in the first place. They wanted his money, and they got it. Along with his penis.

The Aunty Semitism factor too. Apparently “they’re all like that”, to listen to retards. I don’t think JE was that unusual, but only because it’s not unusual for a type A personality with money to be a poonhound. It’s not unusual for Jewish men to like blonde shiksas. And because there still isn’t any actual compelling evidence to support the more lurid and exciting insinuations against the guy.

He was definitely running some sort of kompromat operation. That’s the important bit that’s now occluded by all the reams of guff about imaginary sex dungeons.

Norman
Norman
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

And yet, of all his women I’ve seen, the most attractive by far was Jewish brunette Ghislaine.

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Norman

I do feel sorry for her. I think she loved him, but he did not love her.

Ottokring
Ottokring
1 month ago
Reply to  Norman

She was different because she had personality and ( some ) brains. It was she who attracted the women really, because the bimbos wanted to be like her and the power skirts were like her.

Steve has a very good point. Ghislaine wanted to settle down.

The Original Jim
The Original Jim
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

He was a billionaire.”

Was he? Hundreds of millions maybe. But I don’t think he ever made it into the billionaire class.

Edit: Google suggests he was worth about $600m when he died. Wealthy beyond the dreams of avarice for the average person, but still only a bit of a peasant by modern uber-wealthy standards, who are those who measure their income in billions, rather than their net worth.

Interested
Interested
1 month ago

Media coverage of violence against women and girls and misogynistic harassment is at a “pitiful” low, despite a proliferation of high-profile cases of men abusing women and children, and a rise in AI-assisted violence against women and girls, new research shows.

It’s unclear to me how you could have ‘AI-assisted violence against women and girls’, but you can use AI to search the web. I use the top paid version of Claude, which is pretty good.

I asked Claude the following questions (with its replies):

How many reports has the Global Media Monitoring Project produced mentioning the Rotherham child exploitation scandal Project written mentioning the Rotherham rape gang scandal?

Based on the search results, there’s no indication that the Global Media Monitoring Project (GMMP) has written any reports specifically mentioning the Rotherham child sexual exploitation scandal.

How many reports has Prof Julie Posetti or the Centre for Journalism and Democracy produced mentioning the Rotherham child exploitation scandal?

There is no evidence in any search results that Prof. Julie Posetti or the Centre for Journalism and Democracy at City St George’s, University of London has produced any reports mentioning the Rotherham child exploitation scandal.

How many reports has Luba Kassova written mentioning the Rotherham child exploitation scandal?

There is no evidence that Luba Kassova has written any reports mentioning the Rotherham child exploitation scandal.

How strange.

Theophrastus
Theophrastus
1 month ago

Men are always to blame…

20260330_062037
Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Theophrastus

Such a magical time, when the wife is in labour, grabs your hand, pulls you close, and says… “I HATE YOU”

Steve
Steve
1 month ago

“As the world becomes increasingly digital, the spaces and methods for perpetrating gender-based violence are expanding and proliferating at an alarming rate. “

GbDph9SWQAAQ4Jq
Interested
Interested
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

It’s because real bullying has never been tried.

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Interested

Yes it has, Real Man got bummed, remember

Iceman
Iceman
1 month ago

This means that news coverage does not get to the root causes of the problem.”

News coverage never gets to the root causes of any problems. How could it? (Remember the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect)

Steve
Steve
1 month ago
Reply to  Iceman

Remember the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect

How could I?

jgh
jgh
1 month ago
Reply to  Steve

That’s not how I recall it.

Mohave Greenie
Mohave Greenie
1 month ago

Maxwell is currently in prison for trafficking women. The root cause question should be, who was she trafficking them to? Nobody seems to want to address that crime.

Norman
Norman
1 month ago
Reply to  Mohave Greenie

Indeed, because Epstein seemed perfectly capable of sourcing his own pussy. Looks like Ghislaine had a, how shall we put it, complicated sexuality and attachment syndrome, though.

Gamecock
Gamecock
1 month ago

Media coverage of violence against women and girls and misogynistic harassment is at a “pitiful” low

There isn’t enough violence against women and girls and misogynistic harassment to meet demand.

The Original Jim
The Original Jim
1 month ago

OT but related I guess, now its seems that the Epson gang rape case may turn out to be one of those things that never ever happens – a false allegation of rape.

https://www.surrey.police.uk/news/surrey/news/2026/04—april/further-update-following-a-report-of-a-rape-in-epsom/

#BelieveAllWomen, except when it might paint immigrants in a bad light I guess………….then its ‘show me the evidence!’

Baron Jackfield
Baron Jackfield
1 month ago

I’d suggest that none of “Epstein’s girls” knew they had been raped until the cheque bounced.

Gamecock
Gamecock
1 month ago

“What we concluded by doing this analysis is that the gender-inequality lens is all but missing from coverage of the Epstein story.”

The gender-inequality lens is all but missing from coverage of the Straight of Hormuz.

Coincidence?

30
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x