Doesn’t the existence of AI generated images provide a get out for anyone who was daft enough to allow themselves to be photographed naked or doing something depraved? Even genuine pictures can be claimed to be deep fakes and get you off the hook. My thought is that once the novelty of this technology wears off nobody will care.
Van_Patten
1 month ago
Christ hasn’t the Observer fallen a long way? Makes Owen Jones look like Hunter S Thompson
Ottokring
1 month ago
Sigh
Something that has happened ever since humans learned to draw has improved with technology.
Eg . Cavemen looking at a wall painting. “Ha ha ! Ug was nowhere near the bison !”
Or Henry 8 seeing Holbein’s picture of Anne of Cleves : “Phwoar !”
Norman
1 month ago
Christ what a silly cow. I couldn’t get past the first couple of paragraphs in which she revels in impersonating her daughter to her daughter’s friends. WTF is going on in her empty progressive head?
Esteban
1 month ago
Read just a little of the article, I had no idea someone could gaze so deeply into their own navel.
PiP Community Leader
1 month ago
The piece starts with an obvious lie: “I have been thinking …”.
Gamecock
1 month ago
A Wiseman once said . . . .
Gamecock
1 month ago
Der Spiegel, pointed the finger at her now ex-husband Christian Ulmen. Fernandes called it “virtual rape”. Ulmen denies the allegations.
That he did it, or was “virtual rape?”
Journalists these days.
What the Fernandes case tells us is how engrained sexual humiliation is in our society and how fakery facilitates and exposes existing patriarchal structures that degrade women.
Using apps or AI, you can put someone’s face on another body, doing whatever. If you find someone used your face, you ignore it. Unless you are a Big Shot, and think they were exploiting you. You could investigate and sue. Only someone who spies on her daughter would think it ‘engrained sexual humiliation.’
“Eva, is this engrained sexual humiliation’ in the room with us right now?”
And, of course, creepy Eva sees ‘patriarchal structures’ every where . . . in her make believe world.
Doesn’t the existence of AI generated images provide a get out for anyone who was daft enough to allow themselves to be photographed naked or doing something depraved? Even genuine pictures can be claimed to be deep fakes and get you off the hook. My thought is that once the novelty of this technology wears off nobody will care.
Christ hasn’t the Observer fallen a long way? Makes Owen Jones look like Hunter S Thompson
Sigh
Something that has happened ever since humans learned to draw has improved with technology.
Eg . Cavemen looking at a wall painting. “Ha ha ! Ug was nowhere near the bison !”
Or Henry 8 seeing Holbein’s picture of Anne of Cleves : “Phwoar !”
Christ what a silly cow. I couldn’t get past the first couple of paragraphs in which she revels in impersonating her daughter to her daughter’s friends. WTF is going on in her empty progressive head?
Read just a little of the article, I had no idea someone could gaze so deeply into their own navel.
The piece starts with an obvious lie: “I have been thinking …”.
A Wiseman once said . . . .
That he did it, or was “virtual rape?”
Journalists these days.
Using apps or AI, you can put someone’s face on another body, doing whatever. If you find someone used your face, you ignore it. Unless you are a Big Shot, and think they were exploiting you. You could investigate and sue. Only someone who spies on her daughter would think it ‘engrained sexual humiliation.’
“Eva, is this engrained sexual humiliation’ in the room with us right now?”
And, of course, creepy Eva sees ‘patriarchal structures’ every where . . . in her make believe world.
Examples?