Starmer urges calm as far right seeks to exploit Henry Nowak murder
People getting pissed at the police fuck up here is not “exploit”. Telling people that they are exploiting is only going to increase the righteous anger of course. Because all that sonorous “do not exploit!” shite is just going to get people even more hopping mad as they shout that they’re not exploiting when they insist something went wrong here.
This one is so outrageous that I didn’t believe it when I first heard about it. It says everything about Starmer that his only consideration here is that the incident might make him and his party look bad.
Didn’t let those concerns stop him taking a knee for a foreign criminal, though….
No politician or footballer will take the knee for this poor lad.
Anyone else remember when Starmer knelt for BLM?
Yes…
Everyone.
Like Stonyground, I didn’t believe the story when a colleague told me about it. Apparently, the story has gone viral in the States. I followed up a link in an American tweet to see what it was talking about and it turned out to be this story. Even then, reading the details of the story, I couldn’t believe the police could really be so stupid. So I was very glad to see that Elon had offered to pay for the private prosecution of the officers involved.
You didn’t believe the police could be so stupid? Why not?
Remember when Sir David Amess MP was stabbed at a constituency surgery in 2021? It was widely known that he was a devout Catholic. As it happened there was a priest practically around the corner. He rushed to the surgery to administer Last Rites, but the police said no. That I could put down to simple ignorance of the importance of Last Rites to a Catholic. But to not even check for wounds when someone claims to have been stabbed? That’s beyond stupid. That just malign.
I bet they’re not ignorant of the importance of religious rites to muslims.
The problem with a private prosecution is that, no matter how much money Musk might throw at it, it will go nowhere. The Attorney General has the power to take over any or all private prosecutions “in the public interest”. Result? The prosecution is shut down.
Still worth doing, even if only to make it visible that they have shut it down.
I did like this cartoon on Twitter this morning. Very apt.
I liked this one:
Oh, very good.
“I don’t think you have, mate” should now be the standard response to anything a police officer says.
I didn’t like this one. But it’s very powerful and on the nose.
Starmer urges calm as far right seeks to exploit Henry Nowak murder
That quote explains exactly why the officers behaved as they did when confronted by this incident.It’s how the Starmer class has trained them to think and act.
I wouldn’t say I have sympathy for those officers, but I definitely do have some understanding. Essentially the police force has been taken over by the Starmer class, and has ended up recruiting the wrong people and training them to do the wrong job.
I wouldn’t say I have sympathy for those officers, but I definitely do have some understanding.
Quite. This murder was a direct result of policing strategy from recruitment to training to policy guidelines. This from the Spectator morning news letter (my emphasis):
This is article goes in to it in more depth:
https://spectator.com/article/the-treatment-of-henry-nowaks-killer-was-all-about-race/?status=Active&utm_medium=email&utm_source=CampaignMonitor_Editorial&utm_campaign=MORN%20%2020260603%20%20HOUSE%20ADS%20%20AG+CID_680773fdd349b491aa9578afa8a0f0b2
People may have set out with good intentions when it came to DEI but in practice its come to mean two wrongs do make a right.
Yup. And look at the politicians’ reaction to it:
The Police Race Action Plan “criticises ‘treating everyone “the same” or being “colour blind”’.
A source close to the Home Secretary said that ‘the NPCC is rightly reviewing the wording to ensure there is no ambiguity.’
Gavin Stephens noted: ‘We are listening to legitimate concerns about how some of these commitments are worded or phrased.’
No, there’s no ambiguity. No, it’s not a problem with phrasing. If you’ve rejected colour-blind policing, you’re being deliberately anti-white.
‘A source close to the Home Secretary said…’ what she thinks you want to hear.
No they didn’t.
100%. The intention has always been to discriminate against white people.
The intention has always been to discriminate against white people who aren’t the nomenklatura.
To quote from the Film Bloodsport (Trump’s favorite movie as rumours have it)
“YOU GOT IT!!”
Everyone involved in DEI willingly is a racist – without exception. The road to hell is paved with good intentions. That said, unwinding this will take a lot more than hitherto Reform UK or Restore have shown – and it will of course facilitate significant racism when the entire panoply of discrimination law is repealed.
The reaction to the howls of protest from the ‘Hard Left’ need to be ‘Go F”£$K yourself’ It will also need Franchise Reform (Reintroduction of plural voting, Outlawing of Labour, Libdems, SNP, PC and Green candidates on the grounds they are overtly racist) to make the changes permanent.
I think the need for an ambulance or first aid after being stabbed should count as a specific need.
Use any tragedy to illustrate how your country could be improved, fewer job openings perhaps, and you’re accused of “weaponising the tragedy” of young people without opportunities. Give a different opinion and you are “stoking division”, and suggest that some bad immigration laws get repealed and you are “far right”. Many now speak this way naturally. Probably learnt the words at uni.
That probably makes it the only thing they did learn at uni.
An entirely dishonest sub-headline. No one is targeting ‘communities’ (other than suggesting that Sikhs should adhere to the same knife laws as the rest) they are targeting Britain’s leftist Establishment and the fat useless cowards of the filth.
MTK isn’t really human is he? I know I make jokes about hi being assembled from a box of spare parts but I think it’s closer to the truth that he was actually born to a real human being. The way he reacted to the Southport atrocity, the laying the wreath in an offhand, unconcerned manner and the rush back to London for something interesting. He’s a sociopath or psychopath or summat…
He’s a sociopath or psychopath or summat…
Moral coward.
I think the word you are looking for is “cunt”.
Same as with the Paki kiddie fiddler gangs….
Was there a “strongly worded response” from, in this case the Sikh community (leaders), that this sort of behaviour is *not* what they’re usually about, or even outright condemnation?
*crickets* ……..
Actually yes, there has been; very strong; the Sikhs seem to be generally a lot better than the Muslims:
Also they’d previously barred him from their temple and reported him to the police – who did nothing. You don’t tend to hear of Muslims doing that to their wrong-uns.
I’ve got some sympathy for the Sikhs here. Digwa looks like he’s a bit thick, and seems to have been a bit of a twat, but that seems to have been him, not because he’s a Sikh. This is one bloke and they’ve condemned him; very different to the Muslim gangs.
It’s the police who are at fault here (and the individual involved, of course); the Sikh community seem to be behaving well.
I’ve got some sympathy for the Sikhs here. Digwa looks like he’s a bit thick, and seems to have been a bit of a twat, but that seems to have been him, not because he’s a Sikh.
In this case it appears to be the whole family that are “wrong ‘uns” and not just for standing behind him and continuing to rely on the racism defence.
“possessing an offensive weapon in a private place.”
Is that a real offence? Or is that the journalist messing up?
Yes, that’s a real offence. Alfie Moore’s It’s A Fair Cop had an episode on the bladed objects laws a short while back. Series 8 Episode 4.
It covers zombie knives, death stars, knuckle dusters and the like.,
Interestingly, there are exceptions.
Under the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) Order 1988 (SI 1988 No.2019) Schedule 1, the offence specifically does not apply to the following weapons:
Sounds suspiciously like a scimitar to me.
I’m trying to think of a group which has traditionally employed the scimitar?
Pirate cutlasses? Was that amendment introduced by a Cornish MP?
cutlasses are generally *shorter* than 50 cm…..
Russ vikings, slavs, later the slavic peoples , etc….
Basically… I you think Eastern Europe and western Russia, you’re thinking “sabres”.
Scimitars, talwars and the like would struggle to qualify unless they were, for instance, serious hand-made modern Damascus steel (which makes them very expensive compared to the usual stamped stainless-steel wallhanger swords that you can buy on the Interweb – think a thousand, not a hundred, pounds as a starting point).
The “traditional methods of making swords by hand” is there as a specific exception for tameshigiri practicioners – those folk who like cutting bamboo poles or rolled tatami mats with Japanese katana. They do indeed use blades that are, at the least, made in the san mai style (a hardened core for the edge in a softer, lower-carbon body) if not proper tamahagane. Which, again, get… expensive.
And if you’ve got to the point of having your home searched and your Large Bladed Weapons confiscated… you may end up with your expensive pattern-welded curved sword coming back in bits, after a metallurgist chopped it up to confirm it was what you claimed it was.
You can buy a brand new katana for around £200.
Interesting, they’ve relaxed it to “full carbon steel” as the criteria for the blade.
Wonder how long that’ll last?
“katana”™ ….
You can get about a decent saex for 200 quid. decent sword for re-enactment purposes… 400-600 quid… regardless of time period.
And those weapons are “starter models”…
not to mention *deliberately blunt to strict specifications*…
( something about us not wanting to run out of sparring partners within the hour….)
The price isn’t dependent on the blade-shape or the size… It’s about the *steel* used… which isn’t your standard rebar junk… and can be quite, quite expensive…
And no… You don’t want commercial “pattern-welded” or “damascene” blades…. They’re fancy junk for Tourists and SoyBois….
*If* you want one, from the few smiths ( including the european traditions…) who can still block, layer, and fold…. set aside 2-4k quid, and order one keeping in mind it’ll take 2-4 years to arrive between production and backlog for those peeps..
(PS: I will strongly deny any familial connection to a N. Nobbs, but if I pick up my little collection all in one go…. A certain scene from Jingo comes to mind..)
on the “katana”™… Those are generally CNC milled from stock.
Can still be made of *very* good steel, but the only fire they’ve seen is the foundry..
200quid won’t even buy you the charcoal needed to start on a real one….
Personally, I favour an epée. And you really wouldn’t try & take it off of me.
I *would* offer a bag of marshmellows though…. 😛
Moisten bints in ponds?
Excalibur!
The Kukri presented to me by the Sgts Mess of a prominent Gurkha unit unfortunately falls within the legislation Which is why it’s being kept for me by an ex Army colleague in Cyprus while I seek permission to keep it at home.
“it appears to be the whole family that are “wrong ‘uns””
Again, understandable (even if wrong); your kid does something wrong, that looks like it’s going to land him in a hell of a lot of trouble; you try to get him out of it.
But yes, they crossed the line because trying to protect their kid harmed the victim, by delaying any help for him.
Again, understandable (even if wrong); your kid does something wrong, that looks like it’s going to land him in a hell of a lot of trouble; you try to get him out of it.
No, if they’ve done something obviously wrong you support them but not to avoid the responsibility for their crime. If you’ve done your job as a parent they’ll understand that.
From what I’ve read, it was the police who first suggested the ‘race card’.
Sure, he grabbed it enthusiastically, but the copper shouldn’t have offered it to him in the first place.
Worse, I suspect that’s what the cops are trained to do – that’s the broad problem.
From what I’ve read, it was the police who first suggested the ‘race card’.
It looks like the brother rang emergency services but they would not accept it was a racist crime until he confirmed the racist words used, at which point the attacker claimed the P word had been used.
Wossat, the P word?
Paki?
I mean, why should we care?
Even now, we’re afraid to say actual words.
Words.
We’re being murdered and raped and plundered. But heaven forfend we might use the wrong words to describe it.
I was relating what was actually said, maybe I should have used quotes.
How did the brother know about the incident? Shirley a quick ring home after the stabbing to try and procure an alibi wouldn’t happen. Would it?
52% of Sikhs voted for Brexit, compared to 30% of Muslims…
Yep, this guy and his family might be a bunch of cunts but Sikhs broadly are not. And no one is claiming they are. The anger is against Plod and the government.
The individual’s whole family, in fact
Thing in the Specci suggests it wasnt the Kirpan he used, but a different knife.
He called the Kirpan exemption to excuse posession of it though.
“Actually yes, there has been; very strong; the Sikhs seem to be generally a lot better than the Muslims:”
I know quite a lot of Sikhs. Best mate is one, so know some of his pals and his family.
They’re the closest group to Farage/Thatcher. Closer than the average white Briton. They’re about family, responsibility, hard work, law and order. They’re highly integrated into British society. They mostly speak English, watch English movies. They have white boyfriends and girlfriends and no-one cares. The only real difference hanging around with Sikhs is the food. Religion is really just ceremonial.
I have a neighbour who is a Sikh. Her daughter has a white boyfriend.
I said to her “You’ll never be able to show your face at the temple.”
“I know, the shame of it !” She burst out laughing and poured some more wine. Monkeys given: zero.
Unless those laws conflict with their religion, in which case it’s kickoff time.
Sorry, I’m not buying this bullshit. There is a reason Sikhs have an exception to our otherwise draconian knife laws. It’s the same reason they have an exception to head protection equipment laws (road or workplace). The reason is kickoff avoidance. And we know they will kickoff:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_midlands/4107437.stm
So freedom of speech doesn’t apply either if it conflicts with Sikh religion.
I’m not interested in this country hosting foreign groups with foreign ways enjoying exceptions to our laws won via violence. I don’t care if some foreign groups are less bad than other foreign groups. I don’t give a fuck if your friendly neighbourhood foreigners are jolly solid seeming types.
Foreign individuals – not groups or fucking “communities” – need to decide whether to comply and integrate with this nation – or whether to fuck off.
Preach it, brother.
No, sorry PJF
Specifically a lot of these Sikh exemptions were granted at least 50 years ago. In the Army for instance, Sikhs have always had exemptions for turbans.
There is that great line in Carry on up the Khyber where Bungeditin opens fire on the British residency.
” Ha ha ! That will teach them to ban turbans on the buses !”
Just don’t care, Ottokring.
So they’ve been here for bloody ages and had special rules for bloody ages. And here we are more than a quarter of the way into 21st Century modern Britain and we’re still tiptoeing around the feels of a bunch of violent foreign tribesmen who care about foreign turbans, foreign temples, foreign knives and foreign beards.
At this stage there should be some Brits who used to be Sikh. I’m still happy to accept people on that basis. But a “Sikh community”? Nope, fuck that shit off out of the country. No foreign enclaves. Don’t care about their feels. Don’t care about your feels.
Fuck. Them. Off.
“Unless those laws conflict with their religion, in which case it’s kickoff time.
”
Sikhs overwhelmingly don’t care about their religion. They’ll go get married. The mum might go and help make some food at the temple. But they’re about as religious as little old ladies that do the flowers at the village church who are not burning catholics.
Part of this is the culture, but a lot of it is that Sikhs just don’t have the numbers to create a separate group. If there’s not many sikh women near you to bone, you’ll bone a white woman. It’s why immigration is OK in small numbers, but mass migration is bad. Mass migration retains the old culture, creates division.
There’re well over half a million of them, and they’re fairly concentrated (likely to remain so, mainly due to fear of other minority groups). As with other settler groups, it’s the young who are the most militant. It’s mainly the young who protest against mixed / inter-faith marriages, including with violence. Armed police have had to go in on occasion.
Your view of Sikhs may be formed by your interactions with the sorts of Sikhs you would naturally knock about with. As with Guardian readers and their jolly nice Muslim friends. The reality is a lot different to your bubble.
Thanks for that… The news about that one over here is …limited… and mainly *assumes* the officers “merely made an error in judgement”…
*Nothing* about the rest of what’s written here… It’s still presented as if Digwa was a victim of Waycism and couldn’t have possibly….etc…
Well there has been actually. I heard it yesterday on the wireless.
This sort of thing is really not what Sikhs are about,
Yes, and it also turns out Digwa had been kicked out of his local Gurdwara, Khalsa Darbar, and reported (by them) to the police after he stole some ceremonial knives in 2023.
The police, of course, exercised “cultural sensitivities” rather than charging him…
There bloody well is.
And anyone who won’t see that is part of the problem.
from what I can work out from limited video clips, mostly the clashers were the result of the police deciding they wanted to move the protesters on by turning up in riot gear.
How does rioting help?
Do we still have a poll tax?
The trouble with rioting currently is that it only works for the left and foreigners. They want to riot. They love it. People on the right don’t. But in the end they’ll have to, very badly and effectively, if they want the state to fear them and do their bidding.
But for now rioting is for the left and the foreigners. Which is how they win when they are minorities.
The whole reason police treat different races differently is the fear that ‘the community’ will kick off. Originally it was the dreaed white backlash, after what happened in the US in civil rights times. In the UK that never happened so the emphasis turned to avoiding black and muslim disorder not really white British any more. And now that policy has led to the whites finally kicking off in Southampton last night.
And they call opposition to their stupid policies ‘divisive’.
Nope, that’s what the police are doing, and doing it explicitly and publicly:
K Badenoch’s concern is to ensure that she and her party are positioned to enter government in an anti-Farage coalition with Labour after the next General Election.
Kemi won’t be deciding, her seat is in reform Essex and she is going to lose it. Somebody else will do that deal and the tories will go in with reform if it gets them into government, which of course is the sacred right of the conservative party.
Blimey. Not a particularly strong majority of a couple of thousand there.
“It is making me angry because that’s not how we solve this. That’s not how we solve this. We can’t solve it by whipping people up. We can’t solve it by making them angry,” Badenoch said on Good Morning Britain on Tuesday.
“Nigel Farage is taking sides. I’m not taking sides. I’m saying enough of this. We need to stop this racialising of our society. We are multiracial yes, but we need to stop using race as a way of defining laws … Let’s treat everyone equally.”
Right, and this didn’t start in 2024. So, for starters, Kemi, if you want to show you mean this, expel everyone from the Conservative Party that caused this. Go to war on the wets. Announce deselections.
People are whipped up. People aren’t throwing bins at the police because of Farage, but because they’ve lost respect for the police. Which mostly stems from the police now being centralised rather than local. Answering to the sort of wankers in Westminster rather than to local people.
The whole country has gotten, over about 25 years, fucked off with the failures of Labour and the Conservatives on law and order. You can make promises, and people will trust you for a while but if you don’t deliver, they’re going to go elsewhere. It’s what the Tories and a lot of commentators don’t get. “Is Kemi the right leader?” Too late for that. The Conservatives are like the Austin Allegro of politics and when you have a car that shitty and then get a VW Golf, you’re not going to be easily brought back to British Leyland.
Farage has led, more than any other politician in 25 years. We left the EU because of him. Immigration became a big issue because of him. At a certain point, a lot of people realised he had a better idea of the country’s problems than the main parties.
That particular horse left the stable some time ago, Kemi, and ‘we’ didn’t make it angry, ‘they’ made it angry.
Nah – it became a big issue because of 7/7, the rape gangs, the gays stabbed to death in the Watford park, London Bridge, Lee Rigby, the Shoe Bomber, the Underpants Bomber, Axel Rudakubana, Manchester Arena, the Glasgow Airport attack, Westminster Bridge, Parsons Green, Streatham High Road, not to mention the low level shit that goes on in towns and cities up and down the country, nor that your kids are having to learn in schools where the other kids speak a dozen languages and hate them, and not to mention either than people know that a Bataclan or a 9/11 or another 7/7 is always just round the corner.
OK. I don’t quite mean “because of him”. But he picked up on it first.
But he picked up on it first.
To me, one of the interesting things is just how far behind the curve – at least as far as I am concerned – are most of the public figures I am prepared to listen to.
For instance, Dan Hannan a couple of days ago writing in the Tel about the Nowak murder exposing the deadly truth about anti-racism: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/05/30/murder-of-henry-nowak-exposes-the-deadly-truth-anti-racism/
I see these things and think to myself they’re anywhere between 5 and 15, and sometimes 20 or more years behind me.
I’m not claiming cleverness on my part, I’m expressing surprise at just how unmoored from what seems to me to be reality so many of these figures, even highly intelligent, learned figures, are.
“I’m expressing surprise at just how unmoored from what seems to me to be reality so many of these figures, even highly intelligent, learned figures, are.”
I don’t think they are unmoored, just that they will change their moorings in an instant once it becomes apparent that the tide is changing. Hence why people like Burham, Streeting et al are suddenly happy to say ‘sex is real, men can’t become women’ when they said the complete opposite just 2 or 3 years ago. They have no principles, just words that can be spouted that shift them up the social hierarchy at any given point in time. Reality as they see it in private, and what they are prepared to admit to in public are 2 totally different things.
The likes of Hannan will have known the truth about the DEI-ification of the police many years ago when it became obvious to anyone with eyes and a brain. He just won’t have said anything about what he thought, because it suited his interests not to rock the boat. You don’t get offered directorships, or book deals, or invited to all the swanky parties if you’ve become beyond the pale. Hannan could have written that article at any point in the last 10 years, and it would have been true. He chose to write it now, once events had made it ‘safe’ to do so. Its a highly rational, albeit unprincipled course of action, because one only has to look at what the State has thrown at Tommy Robinson who stuck his head above the parapet a long time ago.
“Hannan … won’t have said anything about what he thought, because … you don’t get offered directorships, or book deals, or invited to all the swanky parties if you’ve become beyond the pale.”
Yup.
And that’s what Farage has done. Although I agree it’s not true that “immigration became a big issue because of Farage”, what is true is that it’s become a big publicly discussed issue because of him.
Nick Griffin could be sidelined by the Establishment, Tommy Robinson crushed, and Lowe treated as a joke.
But Farage “putting his head above the parapet” seems to have been the tipping point – not in people’s beliefs, but in their expression of them.
Kudos to him. Because when he started it, he can’t have been certain whether he had enough public support to carry it, or whether he’d be squashed like the others.
I see these things and think to myself they’re anywhere between 5 and 15, and sometimes 20 or more years behind me.
Progressives and the political class, aided and abetted by the MSM, shut down any debate, labelling those did raise it as racist and extolling the virtues of multiculturalism. A particular favourite was to claim right wing terrorism and violence was a bigger threat.
As Interested pointed out above, the list of atrocities committed by immigrants has been rising and it’s getting harder for them to ignore. Farage in particular has been very good at keeping the debate alive because he doesn’t give a shit about getting invites to North London dinner parties.
Musk taking over Twitter also helped because it had also been captured by progressives and now people on there know they’re not on their own and pointing out that immigration policies have failed no longer marks you as being alone and as a bad person.
Fuck only knows. How much news, and chatter do you need before you see a pattern of behaviour?
The murder of Henry Nowak exposes the deadly truth about ‘anti-racism’
I don’t want George Floyd-style protests. But his killing shows how years of DEI training have distorted the police’s role
No, it didn’t expose it. British police officers and Starmer kneeling for George Floyd were the giant red flags. Rape gangs, heard of them, Danny? How do you look at those things and not think that the behaviour of some politicians and some police is extremely suspect in the area of race, and that if they’re suspect about that, why wouldn’t they be elsewhere.
This murder is bloody awful but did it show me anything, did it expose anything? No. I’m not surprised at all.
When, in 2020, people were losing their jobs for saying ‘all lives matter’ what did little Kemi have to say about it?
It does feel as though the people are starting finally to wake up. I predict many fresh jailings – pushing a bin at a cop is probably five years’ worth – and much more control of social media and the media more generally.
It’s our ancient culture:
If you click on The Critic this morning you’ll see a posed photo of Sir Cur pulling pints in a pub. He is drawing a beer called Tribute, ignoring the beer called Proper Job.
According to the BBC Nowak said ‘at least seven times’ that he couldn’t breathe. Does that remind us of a particular meth- and crack-headed Minnesotan in 2020? The #BlackLivesMatter riots that followed were condoned when they broke the Covid lockdown and isolation rules because they served a higher purpose.
Those who responded with #WhiteLivesMatter, or even more innocuously #AllLivesMatter, were kicked off social media. And now we have the Home Secretary no less condemning a minor disturbance that didn’t begin to approach the violence we saw back then.
There was, of course, the extraordinarily similar case of Tony Timpa in the US.
There were of course no riots, knee bending or shrieks of outage over that case, Mr Timpa being white.
“That’s somebody’s boy. That could be my boy.” – Kemi Badenoch
Yes, Kemi dear, but the key thing is that it wouldn’t be Kier’s boy, would it?
I’m afraid things will only change when it is MPs’ boys, Prime Ministers’ boys, judges’ boys, chief constables’ boys, Guardian columnists’ boys, BBC executives’ boys. And not just in ones and twos. Until then the plebs can suffer and look happy about it.
I used to think that.
Then I read of the reaction of the father of that young man murdered in London on Primrose Hill a few months back: https://www.camdennewjournal.co.uk/article/dont-let-racists-use-my-sons-murder-says-father-of-primrose-hill-stab-victim
In fact I think it was you who drew my attention to it on these here pages.
Then I recalled something similar from the London Bridge attack.
And I’ve come to the conclusion that progressivism is so perverted as to be a suicide cult.
So now, no, I don’t think we’ll chart a different course just because, say, Starmers’ kids get hurted.
There is a term for it: suicidal empathy.
Yeah.
Another conclusion I’ve reached: there’s no point in arguing with them, and that they are content (to say the least of it) see us dead means only one thing – it’s them or us.
And let’s face it Baldrick, it’s the noodle-armed, skittles-haired them.
TBF, he doesn’t fall into any of those categories I mentioned – ie he has no power.
Ok, but he might have done, had he chosen to kick-off about his son’s cowardly* murder in the park over the road from where they lived but a bunch of unnecessarily imported savages.
*it’s interesting just how many of these attacks are cowardly, in the sense that the primitives use weapons against unnarmed people, and often work in packs.
(as an aside, one of the progressives’ current early-stage societal poisons concerns joint enterprise criminality, on the grounds – and stop me if you’ve heard this one before – that it disproportionality inconveniences black people.
Or, to put it another way, according to the progressives, black people are more likely to be offending in feral packs).
Ok, but he might have done, had he chosen to kick-off about his son’s cowardly* murder
Actually, that doesn’t really meet your point.
And yet. If one of Starmers’ kids is murdered, can you see him roused to incandescent fury?
I think progressives are way beyond that thing about conservatives being liberals who have been mugged.
No, though I think that would have roused the general public a lot more than his actual response did.
Really, that was just another white kid stabbed in London by a black kid – been happening for years (along with even more black kids being stabbed, who matter even less in terms of changing things).
Ordinary bien pensant liberal kids are going to need to be butchered in huge numbers for any meaningful course correction (I should say, just in case, that I fervently wish no kid was stabbed anywhere ever).
I think Starmer is almost certainly a psychopath – in fact, I think it is probably very hard to become prime minister if you are not a psychopath.
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing – there are many jobs where a little psychopathy goes a long way, or is at least required for the job.
PM is probably one of those: a screaming empath probably couldn’t do anything significant in any situation – they’d be too worried about the second and third order effects on innocent parties.
And not all psychopaths are evil – they just don’t feel or express emotions in the way that normal people do.
Which is all a long way of saying, No I don’t think he would be roused to anything much, beyond some sort of hammy performance art learned by numbers try to seem human thing.
However, I did say:
I’m afraid things will only change when it is MPs’ boys, Prime Ministers’ boys, judges’ boys, chief constables’ boys, Guardian columnists’ boys, BBC executives’ boys. And not just in ones and twos.
This was deliberately wide and plural, because I anticipated the (fair) response you make.
Prime Ministers may (my amateur psychology) all be psychopaths, or they may not, but I would argue that the people in the list above aren’t necessarily.
I think the average chief constable and judge love their kids and grandkids deeply.
Progressives act in their own interests, like most of us – people who dive into swollen rivers to rescue kids, or attack terrorists with narwhal tusks when they could instead run away, or charge enemy machine guns because their mates are pinned down, are few and far between.
Currently, they are rewarded by the system for mouthing the right platitudes.
But if the incentives of the system change, or it becomes very painful and personal for them as individuals, their response, and the actions they took, might (might) change.
Starmer’s “some sort of hammy performance art learned by numbers try to seem human thing”
That does sum him up nicely
I’d define it as using the issue to steal millions like the BLM organisers did. Or calling for yet more discriminatory laws. If the racist thugs in power didn’t have double standards, they’d have no standards at all.
Starmer urges calm as far right seeks to exploit Henry Nowak murder
Commie speak. Focus groups told them ‘exploit’ is bad. Starmer’s use is simply a “bad tag.”
Commie press won’t challenge it. Indeed, they surely think it clever.
Interestingly – a rare example of a known anti-semite suddenly finding sympathy for the police:
‘The parents of the young man who died called for calm in the aftermath of this month’s murder conviction. Nigel Farage and others ignored that request and claimed that there is two-tier policing in the UK.
There is not. There are human beings who take on the role of policing, many of whom are themselves quite young and relatively inexperienced, who, like all of us, are capable of making errors in the heat of the moment.
That such an error occurred appears apparent in this case, although the confusion that they faced when arriving at this scene appears to have been underplayed in the discussions that have taken place.’
Just as those that have perhaps tackled Pro Hamas marches are automatically guilty of discrimination against Gaza, right?
What I do know is that this is a situation where any politician should have stood back and decided that this was the moment to offer sympathy, suggest that an enquiry take place, that lessons be learned, and that the heat be taken out of the moment; the far right did nothing of that sort.
Nigel Farage, who is now in internal exile somewhere within the UK whilst avoiding questions about the £5 million donation he received before deciding to run for Parliament, has demanded ‘cold rage’ from the UK public in response to what he has claimed is racist policing.
No doubt, Restore will do the same.
Yes – throughout the summer of 2020 I can recall this author and so many on the Left calling for calm and sympathy, as well as ‘Lessons learned’ following the George Floyd incident.
Farage knows this from the experience at Southport, and what everybody else should realise is that this man is more than willing to exploit anyone’s unfortunate death for his own gain.
Fascism always seeks to divide populations. Farage is pursuing a fascist approach to his campaigning. It is impossible to say otherwise. A family who asked for the peace to grieve, and the community in Southampton, and probably elsewhere, will be those who suffer as a result, all so that Farage hopes he might win a bye-election. His politics is moving into the realm of the unacceptable, and beyond. His indifference is staggering.
We should be genuinely worried about what comes next, because I am quite sure there is worse to come.
But of course running campaigns in Farsi and using the plight of people in a far off location on the grounds of religion to stop a party winning a by-election, as happened in Gorton and Denton is ‘the politics of care’
The man is the embodiment of pure evil – nothing more, nothing less.
Has any Third-World immigration enthusiast ever thought that perhaps importing millions of hostile foreigners who rape, rob and murder us at a, seemingly, increasing rate might not go down well with the Natives? Of course not…
Tell me: if Sikhs are allowed to carry blades on cultural grounds, does that mean that when I swagger about in my kilt I must be allowed to carry a dirk in my stocking?
Yes, but may not must
I’m planning on setting up a religion based on the right to carry a concealed firearm. My uman rights innit!
Actually, that paradise exists: South Carolina.
Carry open or concealed. Your choice. No permit required.
It sounds marvellous.
I’m curious, does it extend to swords and such-like, or only to firearms?
Excellent question. Only firearms.
One can carry a big knife/sword openly, but concealed, the blade must be under 3 inches.
State laws vary widely. It is very much like state liquor laws 50 years ago. Some states were just freakin’ odd. Most are pretty much the same now. With guns, 28 states have now gone to “Constitutional carry,” carry without a license. With it is a move to uniformity state to state.
About the only time I carry is riding my motorcycle out in the sticks. 95% is in SC, but a few miles in NC. NC does not allow permitless concealed carry, but okay with open carry. They do recognize the SC permit. Unfortunately, I let my SC permit expire. So that route is off my list. For now. I have thought of wearing a shoulder holster on the outside of my riding jacket, and putting the pistol in it while slipping thru NC.
Legal. Probably too much of an attention getter. We concealed carriers don’t want attention. Nobody needs to know.
The sgian dubh (‘dark knife’) is a short dagger which you tuck into your stocking – the dirk is much more like a short sword and is carried at the belt.
And yes, you can carry both in public – Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 say you can carry a knife for religious reasons, for use at work, for hunting, fishing, shooting, camping, etc, and as part of national dress.
It should be every Englishmans right to carry a Lee-Enfield .303″ rifle and a Webley service revolver as part of his National Dress.
Swordstick?
Specifically outlawed, actually.
I once joked to a friend that I’d longed to own a sword stick. He led me into his hall and from his umbrella stand took – a sword stick. Wot larks it must have been to be an RN officer.
Sword sticks are, unfortunately, illegal in public these days.
On the other hand I have just inherited a naval sword (which is, sorta, a cutlass, but not really). Inheritance is always a double edged sword* given the reason for it but you can end up with some pretty cool stuff all the same.
*See what I did there?
Poor Steed will have to use something else to pick flowers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z2PdaP8m6oI
(classic “The Avengers” intro and outro)
However, a stout walking stick is not illegal. I did a couple of self-defence classes in school in the ’80s (wot, don’t all schools?) that included the advantages of a walking stick longer than the scrote’s reach.
I’m a rarity in that I actually bought myself a RN officer’s sword: partly because I’m a RN officer at weekends, partly because I like swords, but a big element was that we’d just had Ex GOLDEN ORB and the supplier was heavily discounting their remaining stock of QEII blades – most people, buying for family members going through BRNC, wanted RCIIIs.
While the modern version is rebated and ceremonial, the basic design is really good: as you’d expect for a sword design finalised in the times when a RN officer might actually have to hack some annoying Frenchmen to death with it.
(I used to fence at Temeraire with Dicky Barton, who was not just an excellent swordsman but literally wrote the book on the history of Royal Navy swords and swordsmanship…)
Had to look it up. Not legal in public here, blade over 3″.
The Webley is only permitted if chambered for .455″ – none of the puny .38/200 that replaced it, please. And loaded with “Manstopper” bullets, of course; while the rifle should naturally be using that most excellent ammunition developed in India, at the Dum-Dum Arsenal in West Bengal.
I’d argue for a flame thrower. Of course if I had one I’d probably end up burning myself alive in short order.
PS See!! I’ve just proved it’s a good idea!!!
Bit to heavy, I think the main concern in urban areas is muggers, and I don’t mean the Indian crocodiles.
|I used to sneer at the Webley as a kind of british second-class version. My cousin in the paras had one which I was able to handle but not shoot. It’s really nice, beautifully made in the days when officers bought their own pistols.
I would upgrade that to a M16 (not SA80) and a Glock 19 these days
AR-10. A real battle rifle.
No. There is only one real battle rifle.
Blessed be the name of the L1A1 Self Loading Rifle…
That dirk is only knife-shaped, and for some unfathomable reason, deliberately blunt…
An actual dirk is “a tad” longer and nastier, would be worn under the sporran, or at the back when Meaning Business.
( this from Jacobite re-enactors.. I assume they’re right about these things..
But people who also tend to have blackpowder licences tend to know their Period StabbyStuff™)
What isn’t being reported is the police arrived soon after the stabbing at around 11,30pm and about 60 minutes before Henry Nowak died 12,37am. The body-cam deals with just the 3 minutes up to his handcuffing and death.
The police prioritised speaking to the killer and family, and carried out no initial examination of Henry Nowak’s condition. He was sitting, propped up against a wall when police arrived, and the person holding him told police he was waving from side to side and had blood in his mouth.
The question is: had the police properly checked his condition when they arrived, noticed the severity of his injury, begun first-aid and summoned medical assistance, might he have survived?
The MSM is remarkably incurious about this.
In responding to an emergency, the police should prioritise saving life, according to the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP) and standard police first aid principles.
They should have
They didn’t follow the basic rules. Kick them out of the Force, with maximum prejudice.
Police must follow strictly the Use of Force Protocol. Evaluate necessity and proportionality. Section 3 Criminal Law Act 1967 and section 117 of PACE. Use of handcuffs must be proportionate, legal, accountable and necessary.
Handcuffing a compliant, dying person is obviously disproportionate. Further, handcuffing restricts breathing and accelerates shock.
Having established that a stabbing has occurred police must immediately upgrade to declare a major incident to the control room to Category 1 to the ambulance service.
Us the medical equipment (trauma packs) carried in all police vehicles, tourniquets, pressure dressings, etc. Apply direct pressure to stab wounds.
Continuously reevaluate the situation. In an emergency reading someone their legal rights is a waste of time when time is of the essence.
Police training is designed to help avoid “tunnel Vision” where an allegation of racial bias is contradicted by the facts.
This was a grotesque failure of all policing principles.
“he police arrived … about 60 minutes before Henry Nowak died … prioritised speaking to the killer and family, and carried out no initial examination of Henry Nowak’s condition”
Fuck!
You’re right, I hadn’t seen that anywhere. It’s been portrayed as “don’t blame the coppers, they had to make a quick decision in the dark”. But this blows that out of the water.
Did they, at any stage, handcuff the Sikh murderer?
One of the beauties of a gun toting public is that they don’t get all the wonderful, professional training commenters here describe for cops. Hence, they just shoot the bastards. Billy Bob doesn’t check with HR before aerating turds.
Not surprisingly, we don’t get many turds acting up.
It does no good to look around for cops before you do something bad. EVERYBODY is potentially a cop. Little old ladies with .380s can mess up your day.
Andrew Neil talking to the Times’ South West correspondent is worth a listen.
The police dragged Novak away from a wall where he was slumped so they could turn him over to handcuff him.
Dingwe’s father appears to have been part of the reason that the police didn’t call an ambulance by claiming Novak had been jumping over fences and fell, hence the blood in his mouth.
There’s a lot more to come out from this story and in the meantime 3 of the police who were involved are still carrying out day to day duties whilst the 4th has resigned.
I forgot the link. It’s only 10 minutes and gets to the key points.
https://youtu.be/35_SsXDwMtA
” family’s plea that case should not be used to target communities”
A word about the circumstances of the family’s plea. When an incident like this happens the police appoint a Victim Liaison Officer to the family. This is to keep the family informed about the crime, the inquiry, the process. Great idea, you say. But we have heard (I think from Emma Webber, mother of one of Calocane’s victims) that another duty of that officer is to make sure the family makes no trouble and that the interests of the police are defended. Part of this is to cajole the family into making just such a statement as we have seen in this case. In the interests of community cohesion or whatever they call it when one member of the community has murdered another. Following that statement evil slimebags like Starmer can trot it out in support of doing nothing and blaming no-one as he has been doing in the commons today. Well, not blaming no-one in this case, blaming Nigel for noticing.
Wouldn’t you just love to see that poor dad stood up in front of the court only to throw away the prepared statement and tell us what he really thinks?
another duty of that officer is to make sure the family makes no trouble and that the interests of the police are defended. Part of this is to cajole the family into making just such a statement as we have seen in this case. In the interests of community cohesion
The US Federal government had an office dedicated to exactly this – menacing the families of white (and only white) murder victims of Diversity/immigrants into shutting up or releasing statements about how great black people or tacos are. It got abolished only since Trump got back in.
While at the same time, of course, incidents where black people have died such as the Skittles-loving teen who could have been Obama’s son, or gentle giant George Floyd of the ridiculous golden coffin, are thoroughly weaponised by government, politicians, law enforcement, the mass media and even global corporations for their kulturkampf against normal white societies.
Strange, isn’t it?
There’s a Government unit called the Research, Information and Communications Unit (RICU) who’s sole purpose is to repress reaction of the British public to any atrocities committed by diverse communities…
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/mind-control-secret-british-government-blueprints-shaping-post-terror-planning
‘Don’t look back in anger’ is one of theirs, isn’t it?
Reading the tea leaves: this is an emotional gut punch to Normie Brits. People are paying attention to this one now and they’re angry. It’s another Axel Rutabaga moment, and the British authorities are playing it just as badly, with tone-deaf demands on how you should react and arrogant “warnings” instead of sympathy for the murdered boy and de-escalation with a frustrated public. (Because they hate you)
No doubt they’ll try that age-old trick of predicting a 5 million people turnout Tommy Robinson riots and carnage, and when only 600,000 people show up and it’s a peaceful protest then Plod and Hope not Hate will claim to have “defeated” the “far right”
The summer has only just begun…
The preference cascade goes on, Survation reckons the Conservatives are on 2% in Makersfield. A constituency where they got 34% in 2019. That was before the video of Henry Nowak surfaced. Video is powerful.
Do Labour voters love their children too?
Farage came out fairly strong on this one. He had no choice. Restore would destroy him in Makersfield if he didn’t. They still might.
This is what former Labour MP observed in the Torygraph earlier today, amidst much kvetching about Farage:
Instead he risked giving the same deaf ear to the public response to Mr Nowak’s death as he showed in response to the public anger at the deaths of young girls at the hands of Axel Rudakubana in Southport in 2024. He sounded like he was criticising the public for their anger instead of placing the blame where it belonged – at the feet of the police officers who arrested and handcuffed the victim of a stabbing attack on the word of his attacker
Harris gets it and Farage gets it: the most fundamental question in politics is whose side are you on? It’s not about clever soundbites or detailed arguments, it’s about the mood music. People know Two Tier isn’t on their side, and Two Tier is too politically inept to convincingly pretend otherwise. It’s why the vampire-wight Blair has been tapping at his window at midnight.
Farage builds winning coalitions by convincing people he’s their bloke. Today’s temperature check of British normiedom: angry, disgusted, and appalled. If TT was smart, he’d have laid on the Blair crocodile tears for Henry Nowak, and ripped the local coppers a new one from the despatch box. He just got up and confirmed that Labour is the party of two tier justice instead. It’s not looking good for Burnham, this is not going to help deliver Labour votes in Makersfield.
And my, hasn’t Burnham been quiet on this?
Probably trying to work out how to triangulate it, or focus group it, or some similar Mandelsonian/Campbellite bollocksing crime against the Common Weal.
Eyelashes can’t win on this. If he takes the side of the British public, he earns the emnity of Labour MPs. If he takes the side of the establishment line, he puts off voters in Makersfield.
His best bet is to keep schtum and pretend to be interested in local issues, hoping voters won’t resent the grubby fix of a Labour MP thinking a Parliamentary seat is the Labour Party’s gift to give.
Especially a poorly astroturfed nomark like Burnham. If he had any talent, you would have remembered it from his time in government. If he had any charisma, he wouldn’t be “Keir Starmer, but with glasses”. If the Reform candidate has any nous, he will pants this loser. He’s a damp tissue of a man.
Reform needs to go after Burnham on 2 tier policing and Labour MPs being more concerned about raising taxes to pay benefits rather than tackle the welfare bill.
Oddly the main beneficiary of that is Starmer.
Starmer trying to make out that Farage was going against the parents’ wishes at QT when Farage asked his question really was beneath contempt. It was quite legitimate for Farage to ask about 2 tier policing as that is what a lot of the national discourse is about and even the BBC has raised it.
If they did they would hardly vote Labour.
Do they have children? Childlessness seems de rigeur on the Left.
In fairness I think a lot of Labour MPs do like children – enough to spend decades providing a consistent supply for their friends from the Subcontinent across much of Northern England to do with as they pleased.
Troo, dat.
Interesting chat between Cathy ‘So What You’re saying Is’ Newman and Zia Yusuf of Reform.
I’m not a Reform fan, for various reasons, but this is good.
https://x.com/ZiaYusufUK/status/2061903176437993666?s=20
I cannot fathom the likes of Newman. I see her as little different to the Maoist students who murdered their own parents.
How she goes out in public after her humiliation by JP is a minor mystery of its own.
And yet, and yet: she continues to hold down highly paid work.
I have been criticised on here more than once for my conspiratorial mindset.
I can only say that my working life has brought me into contact with a lot of odd people in weird places doing strange things, and that conspiracies absolutely do exist.
That doesn’t mean everything is one, of course, but in the case of the British media I think there’s clearly a conspiracy of sorts, run over many, many years, to ensure that the correct lines are fed and taken.
Cathy Newman is I suspect a true believer; maybe they have something on her, who knows, but it’s less likely for a woman than a man.
But how do you explain the actions of the Daily Telegraph, currently telling its readers that they’re far right thugs for being outraged by all of this?
I doubt the editor is personally compromised, though – again – who knows.
I do think it’s quite likely that he understands that if he doesn’t play ball the expensive government advertising (government ads are apparently taken out as full price, unlike any others) will be withdrawn, and that the government might feel the need to have a look at the industry’s 0% VAT rating.
Worth a lot of money to an industry which is effectively broke.
They’re just another arm of the Establishment and regurgitate the Establishment Narrative.
I think Bloke in North Dorset had it right – it’s about whether they care more “about getting invites to North London dinner parties” or about other people’s kids getting knived in the streets.
Media’s response to Covid policies was certainly the result of blackmail by the government who were taking out whole page adverts in the papers and keeping them afloat.
I was listening to Austrian news at midday today. They mentioned this Nowak case and described the recent Tommy Robinson ( not his real name ) march as being tens of thousands of thugs. Naturally they said it is being exploited by the Right Populists.
( ORF is the best for German speaking news, but the mask slips occasionally. They are fully paid up climate alarmists ).
Their “culture” reporting is pretty dire too: Items on goodthinkful agitprop that only a very narrow segment of the population would be interested in.
Cathy Newman to Zia Yusuf: that’s incitement, isn’t it? [sneer, this is my innocent, concerned face]
Cathy Newman to Bob Vylan: ……………………………………………….
Note Zia’s (Trump inspired, but not copying) frame:
At no point does he give Cathy Newman the authority, which she bitches about repeatedly (“I’m doing the interview”). He calmly takes control of the conversation, and though he answered or attempted to answer her questions, he did it on his terms, much to Newman’s annoyance.
Cathy (and many others) believe a journalist led interview is a zero sum game, where the interviewer’s job is to pepper and interrupt the interviewee with gotcha questions, and their job is to blink and stutter and deny having sexual relations with marmosets. Their credentialst mindset “I’m a journalist, you have to answer my questions” only works on people who participate in the fiction that journalists are somehow authority figures. And to think of all those gurning Cabinet ministers who pissed their boxers because Jeremy Paxman repeated a question, or tried the hoary old pointed silence trick.
Zia knows it’s free air time for him to talk about whatever he wants to talk about, that we’re not in school anymore and journalists aren’t prefects. He’s a smart and articulate cookie. He’ll go far, that lad.
Yes, though it was another time. Not sure Zia would have performed much better then, nor eg Keith Joseph performed much worse now.
There are major differences.
1) Most people performatively hated the Tories during Paxman’s time, though mostly for trivial reasons, and quite liked ‘Paxo’ (I didn’t, I despised the cunt) as being on their side against the hated government
and
2) There were no broadcast media outlets other than BBC News, ITN, and C4, and no way to establish what other people thought about Paxton and the Tories and the relevant issue beyond chatting to people in the pub or at work.
Nowadays,most people genuinely hate the government, for extremely serious, even existential reasons, and they don’t like Newman – they view her (correctly in my view) as being on the side of the government and its rancid policies and backers.
And in 2026 there are multiple ways for Zia Yusuf to talk directly to people – Twitter being the main one – and similar channels for people to communicate across the land as to what an evil shower of shit she and the government are.
This is of course why governments around the world are desperate to shut Twitter down, or if they can’t then access to it.
Yes, but specifically on the famous beady eyed refusing to answer the question after 14 attempts by Paxo, Michael Howard was a clever and able man but he fell into the trap of ceding authority to the interviewer in the first place. He participated in his own televised excruciation, because, no doubt, of good English public schoolboy mores about how one is expected to behave.
Defensive. Rigid. Robotically repetitive. Easily made to look shifty. This was and still is the default, snake-coiling-in-terror reaction of politicians caught in a camera light and a leading question. Trump is immune, because he was a media player for decades. Zia is immune, because he’s younger and grew up used to talking to people on video. Starmo is not immune, you can see the fear in his eyes.
Fear is the little-death, that brings total obliteration. I will face my interviewer, and politely explain to Cathy Newman what a stupid cow she is. And when she has gone, I will laugh.
I remember Paxton interviewing George Galloway after Respect won Bethnal Green at the expense of Oona King in the 2005 election. Paxo just kept repeating “Are you proud of kicking out of Parliament one of the few black women MPs?” He must have said it six or seven times. Galloway simply ignored the question and blustered on in his usual manner.
I think he missed the opportunity to retort: –
As this point in time, there is no amount of I-want-to-fuck-you-people-up that I would consider unacceptable.
We should just accept that they drew the battle lines many years ago, and let’s get on with mopping up.
The Chief Constable of Hampshire was in the Telegraph blovating at peoole lobbing bricks at his officers.
He said: “I am clear we are sorry for handcuffing and arresting Henry, but I don’t know if that is cutting through for people. We understand it and are genuinely sorry.”
No it isn’t cutting through you stupid bastard. If this hadn’t gone through the courts and you were forced to release bodycam footage, you would have covered it all up. The officers responsible are still on duty. One has resigned on “an unrelated issue”. Which sounds even more suspect. This is a catastrophic PR blunder.
You’re lucky that this is England and bricks and bottles is the worst you can expect from the mob.
Yeah, but he hasn’t changed his guidance that “criticises ‘treating everyone “the same” or being “colour blind””, has he?
Oh, this is good:
https://spectator.com/article/why-did-henry-nowaks-last-words-count-for-so-little/?most-popular=3
If Digba had not stuck to his racist story and told the police Nowak had been stabbed, an ambulance would have been called and Nowak might have survived. Then Digba would have got a far shorter sentence. His own deceit caused his victim to die and himself to be a murderer.
AAUI his brother knew Novak had been stabbed when he called in the racist incident, if so if he’d said they needed an ambulance then any chance Novak had would have been maximised.
Incidentally, according to Douglas Murray in the Specie, Digba’s mother hid the blade used for the stabbing.
What a family!
The police confess they are incapable of operating in a multicultural nation.
Any British public figure announcing non-Brits must leave?
Tommy Robinson?
Your government ACCEPTS the unacceptable. How the heck did you wind up here?
They wound up here because 40 years ago they took the easy course & have been continuing taking it.
Stop giving it the biggun. You’re no different, and in fact very few are.
Name a country in the entire world where
a) you might want to live
and
b) where the government doesn’t control the people and fuck them over.
It takes a lot to make an entire population rise up – it’s how fucking Ceaușescu stayed in power so long, and Pol Pot did what he did, and Mao, and the rest.
‘Oh look at those weak Ukrainians, just meekly starving to death during the Holodomor – 40 years ago they took the easy course & have been continuing taking it.’
‘Oh look at those silly Jews getting on board the trains’
‘Oh look at those Tutsis just letting the Hutu murder them’
And on and on.
You seem to associate with a lot of South American prostitutes. How much do they rise up, in Venezuela, or Cuba, or against the Mexican cartels? Not much.
I must have missed the uprising in Spain, after the Madrid bombing, or more recently after the actual socialist government announced it was going to just give 500,000 illegals legal residence.
I bet you were out in the streets, cracking the Old Guillermo’s heads, weren’t you?
To be a pendant…
“People getting pissed at the police fuck up here…”
It wasn’t a fuck-up. It was policy.