Everything always, is the fault of the Proddie Ulstermen. Obviously:
On the other hand, what value democracy if it doesn’t produce what the local population desires?
Everything always, is the fault of the Proddie Ulstermen. Obviously:
On the other hand, what value democracy if it doesn’t produce what the local population desires?
As Julia indicated with her comments about the IRA- sorry, Sinn Fein- the attitude to importing violent third world people is a bit of an indicator of the true intentions of people…
Sinn Fein has gone all in on hard line progressiveness: anti racism, anti Zionism as a mask for anti semitism, pro Hamas, pro open borders and anti working class Irish culture.
Dublin is a tinder box and if it gets sparked it will make the current riots in NI look like a teddy bear’s picnic.
If they are anti: Jewish people having their own country, they clearly must logically also be anti: Irish people having their own country.
Logic? Sinn Fein? Surely sirrah, you jest!
Sinn Fein-IRA were national socialists – now they seem to be international socialists.
Or maybe some politicians are just cvnts ?
But I repeat myself
It’s possible that they were taken over by the people who supplied their weapons at some point.
The marching season is going to be interesting this year.
The obvious parallel with the troubles is that we have a majority that doesn’t relish being pushed into becoming a minority.
No majority ever relished becoming a minority – until it was to late. And the UK is well on the way to becoming majority non-white.
Here’s why:
Suicidal Empathy: Dying To Be Kind, by Gad Saad.
Not by P. Humous?
I don’t actually believe this, in the same way that immigration is the 3rd most important political issue for Labour voters.
Putting myself in the shoes of a Norn Iron republican, they’d like to be part of the Republic. How does that connect to support for mass migration? I’m sure some do, but it doesn’t feel like it has to be the same thing. It’s not like the Republic are particularly lefty (they seem more like free market capitalists than we are now).
Whut?
Immigration is worse in the Republic and it’s gonna get worse still north and south. It will tend to unite the indigenes in the same way as two sides in a domestic dispute turn against the police who come to intervene.
There’s been huge immigration into the Republic in recent years. Ireland now has a higher percentage of its residents foreign-born than the UK, and 70% of them are non-EU.
Things are starting to kick off about it there as well.
This is a good piece from the Spectator’s Coffee House about the problems of immigration in South Africa, the original rainbow country after Mandela’s release. It’s worth a read because it’s a story that the left and MSM is studiously ignoring.
This holds true everywhere and not just SA (my emphasis):
I’ve always thought we already had a perfectly adequate term for anti-immigrant angst; anti-colonialism.
No. Colonialism applies to nations (or possibly powerful corporations such as the East India Company) and means that a nation gets to control a foreign place. Ot does not require that the controlling nation has or aims to achive a majority of the population.
Sudan, for example, is not attempting to conquer the UK. The correct work for anti-immigrant sentiment is xenophobia.
It’s not what they are or who they are. It’s where they are and how they behave. Same as the problem with colonisers.
Sudan, for example, is not attempting to conquer the UK.
No need. Our treasonous political class, abetted by people like you, has simply opened the doors and shoved goodies like free housing and underaged girls at them.
Read BiNDs comment up a couple of places from here. It explains how the left use xenophobia as a way to denigrate real doubts about the benefits and problems of mass immigration. You’re not on the left, are you Charles?
Not wanting strangers about isn’t “xenophobia,” it’s COMMON SENSE. So elitist scum Charles tells us to ignore common sense.
Charles is evil. It’s that simple. He hopes for our demise. He says things to get us to accept our demise.
The commie trick to recognize is this isn’t about helping strangers, as he tries to verbally package it, it’s about destroying you. Commies use appeals to pity to gain acceptance of our own destruction. The irony is the commies have no pity – they use YOUR pity against YOU. As written in the Saul Alinski playbook a half-century ago.
New players. Old game.
I’m not the Communist here. I’m all in favour of the free market. People should be free to come and go, just as people from Birmingham are free to move to Coventry, Portsmouth, London, or even Glasgow. The state should have no role in deciding where people live. It’s Communism which demands such restrictions.
Turd.
People should be free to come and go
That’s just stupid. People from Khartoum and Birmingham are NOT the same. And you know it. You wish us death.
Firstly, I suspect that is deliberately provocative. Secondly, if this represents the view of the establishment, which has failed to pay attention to the wishes of the electorate,, then it has an unfortunate air of Lady Bountiful giving freely what is not hers at no moral hazard whereas other people who didn’t want it are the ones who pay the price in over-crowding, housing rights, theft, assault, rape and murder. Unconscionable
Maybe. I don’t think Charles is a troll. I think he is a twisted dick.
Cirrusly, our mommies taught us to be wary of strangers when we were 2 fooking years old. He comes along and accuses us of IRRATIONAL FEAR. Gaslighting us; insulting our mothers.
No true Irishman would riot.
It is the government’s job – raison d’être – to keep these invaders out. They aren’t doing it. So the people are taking action. Observer says, “No! No! You must allow it!”
‘Violence in these communities’ isn’t murderous invaders. No, it’s right wing protestors!
Resistance is futile.
Oh, Timmy. What would your Irish granny have to say?