An Albanian former drug dealer who snuck back into Britain 40 days after being deported has been allowed to stay in the country after a judge ruled it would be unfair on his wife if he were deported.
Or, perhaps, we do not need the ones we’ve got?
An Albanian former drug dealer who snuck back into Britain 40 days after being deported has been allowed to stay in the country after a judge ruled it would be unfair on his wife if he were deported.
Or, perhaps, we do not need the ones we’ve got?
They’re not even proper judges.
The people who adjuducate on this are Yooman Rites lawyers employed by the Home Office.
The law is an ass…
Pendant klaxon:
“The law is a ass – a idiot”
Where did you get that idea from? Do you say “ah” or “ay”?
English have problems pronouncing proximate vowels. (Don’t try Portuguese!) So it uses an elided “n” to separate. So if you’re a user of “ah’s” you say “ah n’ass” or “ah n’idiot” spelt an. But if you use “ay” you don’t need it.
He’s quoting Dickens. Oliver Twist.
Totally missed me then. I’ve never read it.
There’s no point blaming the judges, they’re implementing and interpreting the laws set out by Parliament. If MPs didn’t want it to happen they change the law and guidelines.
The fact that MPs refuse to change the law is somewhat indicative of the MPs’ desires, no?
Yes. They’ll make a lot of noise and huff and puff but then quickly return to calling Reforms Nazis because they will do something about it, or so they fear.
Blame the judge.
You can’t fire parliament; you can fire her.
The people have a reasonable expectation that judges have a brain, regardless of what parliament does.
What the judge has done is insane. Fire her.
Insane is forgiveable.
Fire her for conspiracy to pervert the course of justice by nullifying the legal and enforced deportation order.
Many judges take a very wide and generous interpretation of the rather vague “right to family life”; and they can certainly be blamed for such interpretations.
They will keep doing it until Parliament steps in, anything else is rearranging the deck chairs.
Left-wing judges will make left-wing interpretations of new laws. So, yes, the laws need changing, but the judiciary needs purging, deradicalising and re-training.
Immigration judges are progressive foot soldiers. It’s as plain as a pikestaff that they’re abusing their position to advance their political agenda.
There is no reason British taxpayers should be funding the nurseries in which they incubate – high street immigration solicitors and specialist barristers.
Cutting off that tap of funding ought to be the work of moments for any government serious about this stuff. (Reform/Restore, I am looking at you (c/o the Skibereen Eagle))
These people did not exist until the day before yesterday and we can get by very well now without them.
Except its judges making their own interpretations of the laws set out by Parliament – as overridden by ‘Human rights law’ and ‘international law’.
I don’t think we had immigration judges until about 20 years ago: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/law-obituaries/5604735/Sir-Henry-Hodge.html
Another one of the nation-sized shits that Blair took on us.
Anyway, point is, we did not have immigration judges before so we can do without them now.
Blair’s dumps were not handed down from the Mount.
Seems pretty straightforward to me. You’re either a legal mmigrant or an illegal one.
If the latter, off you go.
O/T the Digwa woman has been sentenced to three years for hiding the murder weapon. She’s Indian, not British, her children are adults.
Will she be deported after serving her sentence (of one year)? Have a guess.
The judge is an activist lawyer who used to represent illegals when she was in private practice. She should be nowhere near an immigration case.
While I agree the law needs to be changed, that is not enough.
If both he and his wife are Albanian citizens, how would it be unfair on her if he was deported? She could always go back with him. If he still can’t be deported, one possible solution is to either refuse them any benefits, or give them the benefits the Albanian government gives the UK for their keep.
What benefits are they receiving?
I doubt that he is a working, tax paying, domiciled, gent. Under the stupid ECHR rules, he will probably, though I am willing to be corrected, be in receipt of some form of benefit. Even if his wife is subsidising him, now that a moron has said he can’t be deported, social services will be on the case. After all, they have to do something with the taxes we are required to give.
So you have nothing but prejudice to support your complaint.
Judges have to sleep sometime, don’t they
I suspect they just hang upside down in the crypts of deconsecrated churches in places like Shepperton and Pinewood, eyelids ready to spring open if a butterfly flutters by.
What if we just rounded, up all the lanyards…
In evidence provided, Paris Blake, a social worker, claims that despite his drug-smuggling past, Hoxhaj “plays a critical and irreplaceable role in maintaining the emotional and physical stability” of the household he shares with his wife.
…and gassed them? Do we need nonce judges and “social workers”?
Wimmin and their toxic ‘compassion’.
Deport the wife as well.
Excellent idea!!!
Now if he had cupped a woman’s breasts at a members’ only club….
Take ‘immigration’ out of the post title but Reform will need an equivalent of the ‘ ‘volksgerichtshof’ for sure- If for nothing else but to try the Starmer regime (and Blair/ Brown) for treason
a judge ruled it would be unfair on his wife if he were deported
So under British law she can’t return to Albania with her husband?
So under British law she can’t be FORCED TO GTFO OF BRITAIN?!?!
Gamecock – we aren’t even saying that she be forced to leave Britain. She should have the choice to live in Britain while a dangerous criminal is deported or depart for Albania. She is *presumed* innocent so she is not being forced to leave, she is just being offered the choice.
I am of the opinion that a person is simply not naturally innocent of what their spouse does.
You live with them. You see them every day. Even if your spouse is a serial killer you know – and are often actively involved.
Note the ** around “presumed”
Until proven guilty she has to be treated as innocent under English law. If she had been found guilty she could have been deported to join him.
Albanian…. That means Guilty until proven innocent, *maybe*…. in the particular case under review…
No. She has to be treated as not guilty. NFW she’s ‘innocent.’
I am using English not American
You are using stoopid.
That reminds of a recent case in Scotland. Can’t quite remember the details but there was a husband jailed for nicking a load of money and buying things only a wife would use, but she knew nothing about it.
And yet, the husband and wife concerned seemed to have little other personal interest in each other. Funny, that.
Completely unrelated, but fancy coffee machines do seem to be very popular in Scotland.
Especially if a motorhome turns up on your driveway, and sundry expensive knick-knacks turn up around your house.
BTW “snuck”? Fuck off, Terriblegraph.
In other justice news, would you believe a 28 year old WHITE BRITISH WHITE BRITISH BRITISH WHITE in the Year of Our Lord 2026 has no Internet footprint?
Makes you wonder what the cops are up to.
The cleanup team missed a bit . . . See the Angry Bootneck’s video.
https://youtu.be/9N8zRQyel8c?is=gSVC4sied9Mnrov8
Justice update: The Reverend Stuart Campbell has reposted David Davis’ words to his website, saying he agrees fully. He’s daring the cunt Sturgeon to sue him.
Balls the size of wheelbarrows, that lad. Courage, you love to see it. It’s contagious you know.
Which raises the question as to whether the wife petitioning against her husband’s re-repatriation to Albania is in the Yookay or in Albania…