Another confirmation that distributed knowledge is indeed right on certain points.
Lloyd, however, adds a coda that will depress Britain’s publishers, especially Random House. “In my experience,” he said, “the public generally think that politicians are at best hypocrites or simply a bunch of lying bastards.”
Who could possibly argue that they\’re wrong?
Jesu Christe and Good God Almighty. How on earth does this man get regarded as an expert on the economy? Will Hutton:
And there is Bruce Wasserstein, the larger-than-life, extravagantly rich current CEO, who now lives in London to escape even the US\’s minimal taxes.
He\’s a US citizen. Thus he pays US taxes. The US is unique in this regard, that you do not escape their minimal taxes (which, in NYC at least, are not minimal, they\’re higher than the UK…when you add Federal to State and City income taxes they\’re over 50%) by moving abroad. You still cough up to Uncle Sam what you would if you lived in the US (barring some minor adjustments fo amounts under $100,000 or so, which certainly aren\’t going to bother someone like Wasserstein).
Not knowing that simple and basic fact really rather makes anything else Hutton has to say on the subject a little suspect, doesn\’t it?
My apologies here, but I thought that this woman was supposed to be bright?
It certainly represents what\’s happening in Tanzania, where I have been meeting African businesswomen. The popular saying – \’the African farmer and her husband\’ – shows there is nothing new in the essential, if hidden, role of women in the economy.
OK, right, we know this.
Women own just 1 per cent of the world\’s titled land, a fact that makes it very difficult for women entrepreneurs to get bank loans, because they have no collateral.
Yup, we also know this. However, did you know this?
Under Section 4 (1) the Land Act, 1999, all land in Tanzania belongs to the state. Land can, however, be owned in three different ways 1) Government granted right of occupancy 2) Tanzania Investment Centre (TIC) derivative rights 3) Sub – Leases created out of granted right of occupancy by the private sector.
Rights of occupancy and derivative rights are granted for a short term and long term period.
That is, that no one in Tanzania owns land, they only lease it from The State? A fairly important thing to note, don\’t you think, when reporting from Tanzania on the difficulties of entrepreneurs getting bank loans because they have no collateral?
So where does the reputation for intelligence come from?
With those contracts due to expire at the end of this month the writers, who can earn anything from $10,000 to $200,000 per episode are arguing for a share of both income streams.
Tim Adler, editor of TV magazine Screen Finance says one of the concerns will be that with many top British writers forced into membership of the Writers Guild of America in order to sell their work to US studios, they could be forced to turn down any work that does drift across the Atlantic.
Hmm. How does one become a script writing scab? Of course, there\’s a basic assumption here that (having seen a lot of US TV I do so assume) talent and ability are not a necessary requirement.
How glorious this is and how silly of me not to have seen it coming.
So, the allegation is that the supermarkets are doing two things. Firstly, that they\’re oligopolists of a kind, carving up the shopping market between them and there\’s not enough competition. The second is that they\’re driving the smaller retailers out of business….that is, that there\’s too much competition (which is an odd thing to accuse of happening but there we are).
So those fighting either side of that argument (actually, I think the review was demanded by those representing the smaller retailers) ask for someone to go and have a look at the market.
The planning system will also be criticised and is likely to be revamped. The commission will suggest that the "needs test", whereby a new entrant has to prove that a town requires a new supermarket, is a barrier to entry and could be axed. The needs test is unpopular as it hands a big advantage to the incumbent in any town. Abolishing the test would create a level playing field between the big four by making it easier for them to open stores.
However it could prove unpopular with small, independent retailers, who have been put under unprecedented pressure by supermarkets\’ unrelenting expansion.
Aha! There\’s isn\’t enough competition and it isn\’t because of collusion amongst the supermarkets themselves, rather, it\’s the planning system itself. So, loosen that system, allow, even promote, more competition and see the consumers revel in further surplus.
Pity about those small retailers who are going to get steamrollered of course…but then they did ask for the review in the first place.
A little lesson perhaps: if you\’re a lobbying group you might not actually want someone to have an impartial look at you. Might be better just to keep screaming emotionally from the sidelines.
Isn\’t it wonderful? The forms are being filled out, the paperwork checked. Thoughtful bureaucrats, those creatures of near divine omniscience, are making sure that everything is simply ticketty boo in this green and pleasant land. Of course, there are some very slight teething problems:
Dozens of small circuses are facing financial ruin, bogged down by new rules and paperwork which have forced them to cancel performances, send home the clowns and pension off much loved performing animals.
The main problem is the impact of the Licensing Act that came into force at the end of 2005 and which requires circuses to apply for a licence for every site they visit. These cost up to £1,000 each and take at least 28 days to process and frequently much longer.
This has robbed circuses of their traditional flexibility, which involves picking venues at short notice after taking into account factors such as local economics and the weather. It has also meant that if a site is unusable, because of flooding, for instance, the circus cannot move to an alternative venue, even if it is an adjoining field, because this would require a fresh licence.
Circuses can seek a £21 temporary permit, but this takes at least two weeks to process. It restricts the numbers of performances and size of audiences, and results in circuses performing in front of dozens of empty seats.
Almost all travelling circuses have had to cancel performances this year because they cannot get new licences in time. Many have endured weeks on end of sitting idle.
But no complaints from us, no siree! After all, it\’s better that the paperwork is in order rather than people actually doing what they want, isn\’t it? Better that permission is properly granted than that children go to the circus to see the clowns? Vastly better that the Man from the Council, who really does know best, take two weeks to allow a tent to move from one field to the next?
Just think what anarchy would prevail if all of this were not controlled, not under the watchful eye of our glorious neighbourhood commissars!
What do you think this is? A free country or something?
The Prime Minister, who has said he wants a new relationship between government and citizens, has begun work on a draft statement setting out what he believes it means to be British, which he will launch in January.
It will be put out to consultation with members of the public invited to give their opinions on his definition of Britishness, said to include such words as "decency", "fairness" and "opportunity".
Insiders said the statement was intended to reflect "the ideals and principles that bind us together as a nation", and will include a list of "great British books" and historical documents that "constitute the essence of our Britishness".
Add in this as a reminder of what we\’ve historically done to those who have breached those documents and we\’d be getting somewhere I think.
Might give pause to those recommending the abolition of habeus corpus for example, imprisonment without trial maybe.
I\’ve just finished reading through some 1200-1500 sex blogs in order to write up 100 of them for this book coming to all good bookstores near you real soon now.
Does anyone mind if I go scrub my eyeballs now?
Some of them were truly, awfully bad.
Quite astonishing I sometimes find him. He\’s clever and all but manages to get the wrong end of the stick all too often:
This is, in part, why you\’re seeing cutbacks in many newsrooms. I\’m not supposed to say this, but journalism has gotten easier, and fewer individuals can do more of it.
Excellent, productivity is rising therefore we need fewer people to do it.
But as productivity rapidly increases, either the market has to expand or staffs will be cut. And to make matters worse, much like in manufacturing, the rise of blogs and online magazines has created intense, low-cost competition that simply didn\’t exist before.
Indeed, just like manufacturing. what we actually see is both output going up and fewer people required….those people being able to go off and do something else even more productive, like cure cancer or wipe babies\’ bottoms. Excellent!
So the world is getting better in every way, we\’re getting more journalism and more people doing other more important things and thus, we need public subsidies to stop this happening? How in hell do you get to that conclusion from that set of facts?
Finally, we find out why they\’re all like that:
While preparing for my first Question Time last night, talking to former panellists, I discovered a strata of politics I didn’t know existed. With five million viewers it’s the most-watched political TV programme and is taken incredibly seriously by all parties. Blair expected his Cabinet to do it, and face the public (although one G. Brown never did). “Clear the whole day for it,” one Shadow Cabinet member advised me. “No lunch, no nothing, just prepare”. Some of the advice was chemical (half a beta blocker to calm the nerves, it turns out, is a trick of the trade).
Yup, they\’re all on drugs.