Donald Trump boasts about his accounting despite tax returns revealing negative income
The art is in describing income so as to show a negative one.
Sheesh.
As far as I understand it – which isn’t far but perhaps further than at least one accountant we could name – the specific wrinkle which allows all of this is depreciation.
A building lasts – say – 50 years. Air conditioning last 25 – say. And so on. Capital has to be spent on keeping the thing going. If it’s 50 years then at the end of that period of time the building’s worth nothing. So, if you consumed 2% of the value of your building each year you’re not, in fact, eating profits, you’re eating your own capital. Upon which there is no tax of course.
Or the other way around. Your profit is the excess of income over costs. Depreciation is a cost – even if not a cash one in each year. So, depreciation is deductible.
I think I’m right in saying US depreciation on buildings is 2% a year. So, there’s that rent roll, there’re the cash costs each year. So, there’s a positive cash flow which can be spent.
Now run the real estate empire through a series of LLPs. The excess cashflow flows through to the individual at the top who puts all that on the tax return. But so also does the depreciation allowance which flows through to that individual’s tax return. The way I understand it, by and large, is that the 2% is about, or perhaps larger than, the free cashflow. Therefore there’s no overall tax bill. Trump is eating his capital that is.
That’s not right, in the sense of accurate, but it’s a good guide to the base idea.
That such depreciation exists and acts this way is fine, something like this is a necessary part of a tax system dealing with capital assets that decline in value. Where the American system goes wrong, as I understand it, is that the same depreciation is applied to the underlying land as well as the building. Which is nonsense. But that’s what the system is as I understand.
Trump claiming depreciation on his buildings on his tax form is normal, sensible even. His being able to do so on land is an error in the tax system.
Now, I’ve not had a look a the latest revelations and I’m sure there will be interesting little gremlins in there. But overall the above is I’m sure a major part of the effects.
In 2017, his first year as president, he paid $750 (£622) in federal income taxes and claimed $7.4 million (£6.1 million) in tax credits, erasing the tax he would have otherwise owed.
The tax credits included claims for renovating the Trump International Hotel in Washington DC, according to the Los Angeles Times.
Renovation costs are the equal and opposite of that depreciation. Shrug.