A toddler was suspended from nursery after being accused of being transphobic or homophobic, The Telegraph can reveal.
Department for Education (DfE) data show the child, aged either three or four, was suspended from a state school in the 2022-23 academic year for “abuse against sexual orientation and gender identity”.
The school and further details of the case were not disclosed.
But statistics show that 94 pupils at state primary schools were suspended or permanently excluded for transphobia and homophobia in 2022-23.
Sure kids know the difference between Mummy and Daddy, between men and women. But they’ve no damn idea about sex or trans at that age.
Of course, to admit that would mean there’s also no such thing as a trans child which is why it’s not being admitted.
I thought Drag Queen Storytime had changed all this.
Always going to be recusants I suppose
The bigots should be given diversity training asap.
…that would mean there’s also no such thing as a trans child which is why it’s not being admitted.
Quite. Though some progressive loon would probably then claim that not all trans kids are self-identifying but all do exhibit symptoms of trans…
I’m going to take a wild guess as to the colour of that young bigot
and his, her or zer 94 equally evil counterparts.
“That’s not a real lady! Why can’t we have proper story-time?!”
No wonder they want to abolish private education. Some children might not be indoctrinated in the approved fashion. At least in the best boys public schools pupils were never confused about what a male was. So I’m told…
Strange, my school was openly “transphobic or homophobic”. They did try making us feel bad about poofs with AIDS one time, but it didn’t work because we laughed.
Lord Young, the director of the Free Speech Union, said: “It beggar’s belief that schools are suspending children as young as five
Them teacher’s never learned me nothing either.
A DfE spokesman said: “All pupils and staff should feel safe and protected at school and should never face violence or abuse.
“The Education Secretary has been clear that she expects school leaders to enforce good behaviour and we are committed to a comprehensive programme of behaviour support for schools.
“Our Plan for Change sets out our relentless focus on making sure every child gets the best life chances, no matter their background, including establishing free breakfast clubs in every primary school, providing access to mental health support and making attendance one of the four core priorities of our school improvement teams.”
Whenever you read “a [pubsec drone] says”, you know you’re in for a few paragraphs of someone pissing in your pocket and telling you it’s R Whites lemonade.
all do exhibit symptoms of trans…
Steady, on, Theo. That implies that trans is a deviation or illness rather than the person’s true spirit shining through…
I object to calling a three or four year old a toddler. By that age those wee apes have stopped toddling and instead run everywhere.
Kid probably called the lone male teacher a poofter, because he’s heard his dad say it, because it’s true.
Alternatively, the child’s behaviour was atrocious, and they made up a pretext to get rid of him (invariably a boy).
Children often start out with vague ideas of categories; any four-legged furry animal, including cats, gets filed in the “doggie” category. A year or later their mental categories have become quite rigid. How many parents have been publicly mortified when their little darling sees someone whose body shape is non-standard and says, “Mommy, why is that lady so fat?”. Or “Why does that man have only one arm?” It takes a while for those categorical definitions to loosen up again enough to allow them to classify a chick with a dick as a “woman”. Asking very young children to be trans-aware may be something that’s simply beyond their cognitive development.
“Alternatively, the child’s behaviour was atrocious, and they made up a pretext to get rid of him (invariably a boy).”
Andrew M has found the Occam explanation.
Maybe he was speaking in English which upset the other 29 pupils who didn’t?
They are not going to be seeing trans three-year-olds, so the sin is to notice something about the adults.
‘Why is Miss such a flaming lezzer?’
‘What’s that bulge in Miss’s pants?’
Steve,
I think trannies are mentally ill. Which doesn’t mean I’m impolite to them, or want them abused. Many of them are otherwise productive, pleasant people. The ARM RISC architecture was invented by a tranny and the banging score to Tron. But they are mentally ill.
Like we all got exposed to Joey Deacon at a slightly older age with Blue Peter, and we were little shits about him. But, a teacher bollocks a kid about it, a dad tells off his son. Or if it’s still there at 13, that girl you like thinks your an idiot. You might still be calling your mate an utter Joey down the pub at 21 for spilling his pint, but you learned not to do it in polite company.
But none of this is about improving a child, is it? It’s the equivalent of painting a hospital just before the queen arrives so it looks good on the telly. That these people running it covered their arse, did the current fashionable thing. If the Tranny had complained, they can say the boy was excluded and no-one will say that *they* were transphobic, and that’s what’s actually going on here.
If you don’t like 4 year old boys being rude to trannies, don’t put them near them. 4 year old boys have zero filter and you can’t do much to get them to learn to get one. Like you didn’t get Fingerbobs with Joey Deacon or Tomsk yelling at Great Uncle Bulgaria for deadnaming him “It;s Tomskina, BIGOT!”. Children have plenty of years between the ages of 10 and 18 to work through the mature stuff for adulthood like spazzos, trannies, and why they’re taking more interest in the assistant on Dr Who than all the time travel stuff.
Take a look at this:
https://archive.ph/lhl0J
It’s Hebden Bridge, unaccountably, lesbian hotspot of the North. Did Dave Boardman ever possess a willy or tits? Because the article itself makes it impossible for me to decide, and on that basis, figure out what it’s actually about.
WB – I think trannies are mentally ill. Which doesn’t mean I’m impolite to them, or want them abused. Many of them are otherwise productive, pleasant people. The ARM RISC architecture was invented by a tranny and the banging score to Tron. But they are mentally ill.
I’ve always felt sorry for them since reading about what happened to poor Dan “Danielle” Bunten, the programmer of M.U.L.E. He was warning people decades ago about the cock chop, but nobody listened.
Tranny hormones are to nerds what crack cocaine was to black guys in 90’s Compton. They’re particularly at risk for a number of reasons, beginning with being on the autism spectrum. Highly disproportionate number of coders, sound engineers and computer jannies end up trooning out in middle age. If doctors had any professional standards, that would be a red flag for the whole idea of “transgender”.
If milliners made up 70% of people claiming to be Napoleon, we wouldn’t rush to give them Bonaparte affirming surgery on the NHS, we’d ask what causes so many hatters to go mad?
Like we all got exposed to Joey Deacon at a slightly older age with Blue Peter, and we were little shits about him. But, a teacher bollocks a kid about it, a dad tells off his son. Or if it’s still there at 13, that girl you like thinks your an idiot. You might still be calling your mate an utter Joey down the pub at 21 for spilling his pint, but you learned not to do it in polite company.
There should be a blue oval plaque to commemorate teaching an entire generation of British children about belming.
But none of this is about improving a child, is it? It’s the equivalent of painting a hospital just before the queen arrives so it looks good on the telly. That these people running it covered their arse, did the current fashionable thing. If the Tranny had complained, they can say the boy was excluded and no-one will say that *they* were transphobic, and that’s what’s actually going on here.
What do Jesuits and the LGBTQ have in common? They both want 7 year old boys.
I think it’s time to embrace the fact that our education system doesn’t want boys to succeed, it sees them as the enemy. In much the same way that British judges see working class white men as the enemy. Look at how much they love vile agitprop such as the Netflix show “Adolescence”. That’s what they think of the white working class: scum. Scum to be managed, hectored, lectured, and put in a cage if they get too mouthy.
If you don’t like 4 year old boys being rude to trannies, don’t put them near them. 4 year old boys have zero filter and you can’t do much to get them to learn to get one. Like you didn’t get Fingerbobs with Joey Deacon or Tomsk yelling at Great Uncle Bulgaria for deadnaming him “It;s Tomskina, BIGOT!”. Children have plenty of years between the ages of 10 and 18 to work through the mature stuff for adulthood like spazzos, trannies, and why they’re taking more interest in the assistant on Dr Who than all the time travel stuff.
I agree, but I really dislike the crude, uneducated racism so many kids have these days.
Bring back the elegant racism from a more civilised age.