Skip to content

Polly, Polly…..

Nothing has been done about bonuses or the absent link between pay and performance

Bonuses are pay for performance.

Nothing has been done about the huge profits investment banks skim off all transactions – while they resist a tiny transaction tax.

The transactions tax being advocated is larger than the profits being skimmed off the transactions. That\’s in fact the very aim of it.

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Churm Rincewind
Churm Rincewind
14 years ago

The mooted transactions tax is indeed idiotic.

However, although bonuses are indeed pay for performance, the objection is that in many cases the criteria for “performance” are undemanding to the point of irrelevance. My favourite example is the (recently disbanded) UK Film Council, where the Chief Executive was paid an annual bonus for not resigning. In short, his performance target was to turn up to work. On this basis ( who would have thought it) he managed to turn in a satisfactory performance on a consistent basis year after year after year. This is just one example; don’t get me started on Cable and Wireless.

Can you help support The Blog? If you can spare a few pounds you can donate to our fundraising campaign below. All donations are greatly appreciated and go towards our server, security and software costs. 25,000 people per day read our sites and every penny goes towards our fight against for independent journalism. We don't take a wage and do what we do because we enjoy it and hope our readers enjoy it too.
1
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x