‘Still not asking for it’: Powerful photo series of nearly nude women aims to prove that ‘regardless of what they’re wearing, there is no justification for sexual assault’
Only that it can make it more likely.
There is a certain amusement in that number 3 appears to have had some work done…..
Powerful?
I’m sure I’ve seen TV adverts suggesting you don’t leave your kitchen window open when you go out or valuables on your car seat when you leave your car.
The advert didn’t say you DESERVE to be robbed if you don’t do these things, only that it’s more likely.
If I suggested that a girl walked home down a brightly lit road lined with police officers rather than an unlit alley full of men drunk and high on drugs I wouldn’t be saying she DESERVED to be attacked if she ignored my advice.
It can hardly prove that there is no justification for sexual assault. Those of us brung up to respect and love women get it, even if they were naked we’d not think they were asking for it. Thems what was brung up to think they own women will not get it.
First step, stop importing misogynistic Muslims and start getting rid of the ones we already have. It won’t completely eliminate the problem but it will drastically reduce it.
What about young men who have been instructed by authority figures respected in their society that improperly dressed and/or unescorted women are asking for it?
Who will these young men believe?
DocBud has it, Ironman will call him a thick.racist.prick, even though he will be unable to explain which race it is to which muslims belong.
Life, done normally as it was in the UK for quite a long time, is actually very simple: mum and dad marry, have children, mum stays at home, dad goes to work, they do their best to stick together through the usual marital ups and downs – not all succeeded but most did – andteach their kids to be polite, decent, normal people. And so it goes on.
Politicians of all stripes fucked all that up. They just can’t help themselves, can they?
Pat,
That is why we don’t want those young men in the West.
I think it’s #4 who’s had some work done and not #3?
Tim, I think you’ll find that there are people maintaining precisely that position. Probably not regular attenders of your local CofE though…
A woman call Rory is married to a man called Aex and she meets a woman called Alex and etc. etc.
At least with their clothes off you can see which ones are women.
With full permission from MrsBud, which would never be forthcoming (unless Sean Bean dropped by at the same time), and full consent, #3 would be my choice.
Pat:
Who will these young men believe?
Good point, especially when politicians fawn over these “community leaders” and defer to their judgement.
DocBud – “unless Sean Bean dropped by at the same time”
He’s a wrong un, that Sharpie.
“Nipple tape prevents rape” is that what they are promoting?
I wasn’t paying much atternation to the text so I may have missed something?
Y’know.. I’ve always wondered how women in clubs and other places where people socialise expect flaunting their Babies to Work their Magic and Get Them Free Drinks, at the same time assume that there be no other associations or expectations from the male population at large .
My word at least half of them are pretty safe from rape even if they walked stark naked through downtown Damascus at closing time.
The line up looks like a casting call for “Cell Block H ” set in a nudist colony. A bigger bunch of hard-faced looking bovines would be hard to find anywhere.
“It’s the ugly ones that fear rape.” – GC
“Slut walks”, eh? Well girls, your Progressive ideals will produce a society in a few decades time where a “slut walk” is you leaving the house without permission.
Enjoy it while you can.
Why is the body writing in English?
The fucking tats put me off before even looking at their horrible expressions. They are in no danger from me, even at my age.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributory_negligence
This isn’t a protest. It’s marketing. She’s a photographer looking to raise her profile and beg some money to do some more photography. It’s only common sense to pick a topic that’s hot with the sistas and with the blokes that really wanna be sistas.
oh… and I’ll have a number 4 and a brown paper bag, please.
“The fucking tats put me off before even looking at their horrible expressions. ”
Yup. The definition of damaged goods.
Theophrastus,
Yeah, maybe you should check out Thames Valley Police’s tea video. It’s not perfect (maybe they should have included a bit about clothing doesn’t mean tea can be forced down someone’s throat), but you will understand it.
Hopefully for the people around you, anyway.
I was going to point out that some maladjusted fuckers do indeed see skimpy clothing on a potential victim as a justification for rape, and expected the usual litany of idiots saying I’m wrong. Fortunately, Theophrastus got in first to prove me right. Unfortunately, he and others like him exist.
God awful tattooed slags.
Awful.
Is the objection to tattoos in general or on this line up in particular.
Dave – £I was going to point out that some maladjusted fuckers do indeed see skimpy clothing on a potential victim as a justification for rape, and expected the usual litany of idiots saying I’m wrong. Fortunately, Theophrastus got in first to prove me right. Unfortunately, he and others like him exist.”
Oddly enough the police up North somewhere have been taking to breaking into people’s homes and then sending them a text message with pictures of the Plod in their dining rooms. Warning them to be more careful next time.
No doubt their Sex Crimes Unit is a bundle of laughs.
Few ideas should be pushed to their logical conclusion. At some point common sense ought to get a look in.
Matthew wins the thread, I think.
I’m with you on the tats – personally I can’t bloody stand them on women. However, I was particularly puzzled by the line “I would like to include many more genders…” Just how many more genders are there?
And is it my cis-patriarchal heteronormative privilege speaking here or would all* of these munters look better in squirrel costumes?
*except maybe number 4 if I could get past the tramp stamps or 3 if I was catatonic and desperate in a Wigan night club.
“No one says it justifies it, you idiots”
Actually, a lot of people *do* say exactly that. Such as a certain Imam in the aftermath of Cologne’s New Year’s Day.
http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/20/cologne-imam-blames-women-for-being-assaulted/
The idiocy is that these women are parading around in the parts of the country where people *already agree* with them.
The girls are only doing it to prove a serious point.
Oh, yes.
Really.
Dave:”Unfortunately, he and others like him exist.”
The misfortune is in the existence of crawling manginas like you.
If some fool wanders around scum zones with wads of cash sticking out of his pockets–he does not deserve to be robbed–but he increases the likelihood of such a circumstance materialising.
If women behave foolishly–getting pissed being more of a danger than clothes( after all most natives here have a far greater degree of self-control than those who claim that the sight of a woman’s hair is more than they can cope with) then they increase their chances of being targeted. The range of risky behaviours is in fact quite small–when dealing with natives. It must not be allowed to be expanded just because of our dear imported friends.
‘Just how many more genders are there?’
Allowing gender when sex was meant, it led inevitably to further corruption of the language.