Thousands of tents supplied by China, Egypt and Saudi Arabia to shelter displaced Palestinians in Gaza offer only limited protection against rain and wind, an assessment compiled by shelter specialists in the devastated territory has revealed.
The assessment will undermine claims that Palestinians in Gaza are being supplied with adequate shelter. Fierce storms in recent weeks blew down or damaged thousands of tents, affecting at least 235,000 people, according to UN estimates.
Prepared by the Palestine Shelter Cluster, which coordinates the activities of nearly 700 non-government organisations in Palestine and is jointly chaired by the Red Cross and the UN, the assessment found that newly delivered tents housing hundreds of thousands of people would “likely need to be replaced”.
“The fabric [of the Egyptian tents] tears easily as sewing quality is poor,” it reported. “The fabric is not waterproof. Other issues include small windows, weak structure, no flooring, the roof collects water due to the design of the tent, and no mesh for openings.”
Tents from Saudi Arabia were criticised as having “non-waterproof light fabric, weak structure” and tents donated by China were “very light” and not waterproof.
Those supplied by Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and the United Nations were judged to have met the specifications of UN experts.
The findings – based on 9,000 responses to a poll on social media in November, observations “from partners on the ground” and “community feedback” – will raise new questions about the quality of aid being supplied directly to Gaza by individual countries, which have been favoured by Israeli authorities seeking to bypass the UN.
Look at what claim 1 is. Because THE JOOOOS don’t work with the UN therefore the Pallys are being left tentless. Or reasonably tentless. It is the fault of THE JOOOOS, obviously, not the people who sent the tents. Of course.
Sigh.
Now really think about this. The people who aren’t allowed to manage the aid – the UN – are complaining that the aid – not being managed by the UN – isn’t good enough. Now who could have predicted that reaction from a bureaucracy?